Jennifer Waljee1, Lin Zhong1, Onur Baser1, Huseyin Yuce2, David A Fox1, Kevin C Chung1. 1. Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery (J.W., L.Z., and K.C.C.), and Department of Internal Medicine (O.B. and D.A.F.), University of Michigan Health System, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5340. E-mail address for K.C. Chung: kecchung@med.umich.edu. 2. Department of Mathematics, New York City College of Technology, 300 Jay Street, N826, Brooklyn, NY 11201.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis, aggressive immunosuppression can be difficult to tolerate, and surgery remains an important treatment option for joint pain and deformity. We sought to examine the epidemiology of surgical reconstruction for rheumatoid arthritis among older individuals who were newly diagnosed with the disorder. METHODS: We identified a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries (sixty-six years of age and older) newly diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis from 2000 to 2005, and followed these patients longitudinally for a mean of 4.6 years. We used univariate analysis to compare the time from the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis to the first operation among the 360 patients who underwent surgery during the study period. RESULTS: In our study cohort, 589 procedures were performed among 360 patients, and 132 patients (37%) underwent multiple procedures. The rate of upper extremity reconstruction was 0.9%, the rate of lower extremity reconstruction was 1.2%, and knee arthroplasty was the most common procedure performed initially (31%) and overall (29%). Upper extremity procedures were performed sooner than lower extremity procedures (fourteen versus twenty-five months; p = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, surgery rates declined with age for upper and lower extremity procedures (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Knee replacement remains the most common initial procedure among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, upper extremity procedures are performed earlier than lower extremity procedures. Understanding the patient and provider factors that underlie variation in procedure rates can inform future strategies to improve the delivery of care to patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
BACKGROUND: For elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis, aggressive immunosuppression can be difficult to tolerate, and surgery remains an important treatment option for joint pain and deformity. We sought to examine the epidemiology of surgical reconstruction for rheumatoid arthritis among older individuals who were newly diagnosed with the disorder. METHODS: We identified a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries (sixty-six years of age and older) newly diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis from 2000 to 2005, and followed these patients longitudinally for a mean of 4.6 years. We used univariate analysis to compare the time from the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis to the first operation among the 360 patients who underwent surgery during the study period. RESULTS: In our study cohort, 589 procedures were performed among 360 patients, and 132 patients (37%) underwent multiple procedures. The rate of upper extremity reconstruction was 0.9%, the rate of lower extremity reconstruction was 1.2%, and knee arthroplasty was the most common procedure performed initially (31%) and overall (29%). Upper extremity procedures were performed sooner than lower extremity procedures (fourteen versus twenty-five months; p = 0.02). In multivariable analysis, surgery rates declined with age for upper and lower extremity procedures (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Knee replacement remains the most common initial procedure among patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, upper extremity procedures are performed earlier than lower extremity procedures. Understanding the patient and provider factors that underlie variation in procedure rates can inform future strategies to improve the delivery of care to patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Authors: L R Lard; H Visser; I Speyer; I E vander Horst-Bruinsma; A H Zwinderman; F C Breedveld; J M Hazes Journal: Am J Med Date: 2001-10-15 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Loreto Massardo; Sherine E Gabriel; Cynthia S Crowson; W Michael O'Fallon; Eric L Matteson Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: A V Diez Roux; S S Merkin; D Arnett; L Chambless; M Massing; F J Nieto; P Sorlie; M Szklo; H A Tyroler; R L Watson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-07-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J H Humphreys; A Warner; J Chipping; T Marshall; M Lunt; D P M Symmons; S M M Verstappen Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Kevin C Chung; Sandra V Kotsis; Patricia B Burns; Frank D Burke; E F Shaw Wilgis; David A Fox; H Myra Kim Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2017-06-09 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Edward Burn; Christopher J Edwards; David W Murray; Alan Silman; Cyrus Cooper; Nigel K Arden; Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 7.580