Literature DB >> 25739847

A qualitative analysis of methotrexate self-injection education videos on YouTube.

Rebekah Rittberg1, Tharindri Dissanayake2, Steven J Katz3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify and evaluate the quality of videos for patients available on YouTube for learning to self-administer subcutaneous methotrexate. Using the search term "Methotrexate injection," two clinical reviewers analyzed the first 60 videos on YouTube. Source and search rank of video, audience interaction, video duration, and time since video was uploaded on YouTube were recorded. Videos were classified as useful, misleading, or a personal patient view. Videos were rated for reliability, comprehensiveness, and global quality scale (GQS). Reasons for misleading videos were documented, and patient videos were documented as being either positive or negative towards methotrexate (MTX) injection. Fifty-one English videos overlapped between the two geographic locations; 10 videos were classified as useful (19.6 %), 14 misleading (27.5 %), and 27 personal patient view (52.9 %). Total views of videos were 161,028: 19.2 % useful, 72.8 % patient, and 8.0 % misleading. Mean GQS: 4.2 (±1.0) useful, 1.6 (±1.1) misleading, and 2.0 (±0.9) for patient videos (p < 0.0001). Mean reliability: 3.3 (±0.6) useful, 0.9 (±1.2) misleading, and 1.0 (±0.7) for patient videos (p < 0.0001). Comprehensiveness: 2.2 (±1.9) useful, 0.1 (±0.3) misleading, and 1.5 (±1.5) for patient view videos (p = 0.0027). This study demonstrates a minority of videos are useful for teaching MTX injection. Further, video quality does not correlate with video views. While web video may be an additional educational tool available, clinicians need to be familiar with specific resources to help guide and educate their patients to ensure best outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Methotrexate; Patient education; Rheumatoid arthritis; Webcasts

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25739847     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-015-2910-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  15 in total

1.  Getting a second opinion: health information and the Internet.

Authors:  Cathy Underhill; Larry Mckeown
Journal:  Health Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.796

2.  Teaching methotrexate self-injection with a web-based video maintains patient care while reducing healthcare resources: a pilot study.

Authors:  Steven J Katz; Sylvia Leung
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis--a wakeup call?

Authors:  Abha G Singh; Siddharth Singh; Preet Paul Singh
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Comparison of serum concentrations of methotrexate after various routes of administration.

Authors:  M Freeman-Narrod; B J Gerstley; P F Engstrom; R S Bornstein
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Methotrexate--how does it really work?

Authors:  Edwin S L Chan; Bruce N Cronstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 6.  Parenteral methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Yusuf Yazici; Yasmin Bata
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013)       Date:  2013

7.  Frequency of fear of needles and impact of a multidisciplinary educational approach towards pregnant women with diabetes.

Authors:  Alina Coutinho Rodrigues Feitosa; Luciana Nunes Sampaio; Ana Graciele Lessa Batista; Carla Borges Pinheiro
Journal:  Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet       Date:  2013-03

8.  Analysis of YouTube as a source of information for West Nile Virus infection.

Authors:  Divyanshu Dubey; Amod Amritphale; Anshudha Sawhney; Devashish Dubey; Nupur Srivastav
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-02-26

Review 9.  A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web.

Authors:  André Bernard; Morgan Langille; Stephanie Hughes; Caren Rose; Desmond Leddin; Sander Veldhuyzen van Zanten
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-05-19       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Effectiveness of YouTube as a Source of Medical Information on Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  He-Ming Chen; Zhong-Kai Hu; Xiao-Lin Zheng; Zhao-Shun Yuan; Zhao-Bin Xu; Ling-Qing Yuan; Vinicio A De Jesus Perez; Ke Yuan; Mark Orcholski; Xiao-Bo Liao
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2013-11-21
View more
  21 in total

1.  Does YouTube provide high quality information? Assessment of secukinumab videos.

Authors:  Burhan Fatih Kocyigit; Mazlum Serdar Akaltun
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Analysis of the YouTube videos on pelvic floor muscle exercise training in terms of their reliability and quality.

Authors:  Yeliz Culha; Ezgi Seyhan Ak; Erkan Merder; Ahmet Ariman; Mehmet Gokhan Culha
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Ask the rheumatologist online: a qualitative analysis of a web-based service.

Authors:  Steven J Katz
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  YouTube videos as health decision aids for the public: An integrative review.

Authors:  Kimberly Haslam; Heather Doucette; Shauna Hachey; Teanne MacCallum; Denise Zwicker; Martha Smith-Brilliant; Robert Gilbert
Journal:  Can J Dent Hyg       Date:  2019-02-01

5.  Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review.

Authors:  Wael Osman; Fatma Mohamed; Mohamed Elhassan; Abdulhadi Shoufan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.263

6.  English-language videos on YouTube as a source of information on self-administer subcutaneous anti-tumour necrosis factor agent injections.

Authors:  Sena Tolu; Ozan Volkan Yurdakul; Betul Basaran; Aylin Rezvani
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Evaluation.

Authors:  Eleanor M Birch; Karolina Leziak; Jenise Jackson; Emma Dahl; Charlotte M Niznik; Lynn M Yee
Journal:  JMIR Diabetes       Date:  2022-04-07

8.  Perceived Patient-Provider Communication Quality and Sociodemographic Factors Associated With Watching Health-Related Videos on YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Authors:  Aisha Langford; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Educational quality of YouTube videos on musculoskeletal ultrasound.

Authors:  Orhan Zengin; Mustafa Erkut Onder
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Assessment of the Quality, Understandability, and Reliability of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Basal Cell Carcinoma: Web-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Theresa Steeb; Lydia Reinhardt; Matthias Harlaß; Markus Vincent Heppt; Friedegund Meier; Carola Berking
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2022-03-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.