Literature DB >> 25739347

Candidate comprehension of key concepts in kidney transplantation.

Sayeeda Ahsanuddin1, Sandra Bento2, Nicholas Swerdlow2, Ixel Cervera2, Liise K Kayler2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although kidney transplant candidates receive education regarding transplantation and donation, little is known about the extent of their comprehension. We aimed to identify factors that affect patient comprehension of important concepts regarding kidney transplantation.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional survey of consecutive adult kidney transplant candidates seen at our center between July 2013 and October 2013 for initial evaluation (n=100) or for reevaluation (n=117). The main outcome measure was a Knowledge Assessment Questionnaire completed by patients. We assessed factors affecting patient understanding of key kidney transplant concepts as measured by mean knowledge score.
RESULTS: Mean knowledge scores of those at evaluation (72±21) and those at reevaluation (70±20; p=0.4769) were similar; therefore the entire cohort was analyzed as a single group. Compared to the high-scoring group, low-scorers (<75%; median value) were significantly more likely to be older, Hispanic, with lower education attainment, and have end-stage renal disease due to hypertension or diabetes rather than other etiologies. On multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for low-scores were increasing age (aOR 1.03 (95% CI 1.01-1.06) and educational level (less than high school; aOR 4.23, 95%CI 1.82-9.80; high school or GED aOR2.85, 95% CI 1.43-5.70 compared to some college or technical school). Of 139 candidates that consented to receive ECD and 152 consenting to CDCHR kidneys, 52% and 27%, respectively, answered the high-risk-specific question incorrectly.
CONCLUSIONS: Educational level and older age are independent risk factors for poor comprehension. Kidney candidate knowledge of organs with increased risks is suboptimal despite previous consent to receive such organs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25739347     DOI: 10.12659/AOT.892596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transplant        ISSN: 1425-9524            Impact factor:   1.530


  7 in total

1.  Educational Animations to Inform Transplant Candidates About Deceased Donor Kidney Options: An Efficacy Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Liise K Kayler; Beth A Dolph; Chelsea N Cleveland; Maria M Keller; Thomas H Feeley
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2020-06-23

2.  Development and Validation of the Kidney Transplant Understanding Tool (K-TUT).

Authors:  Nicola Rosaasen; Jeff Taylor; David Blackburn; Rahul Mainra; Ahmed Shoker; Holly Mansell
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2017-02-08

3.  Psychological and Psychopathological Aspects of Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Concetta De Pasquale; Maria Luisa Pistorio; Massimiliano Veroux; Luisa Indelicato; Gabriella Biffa; Nunzialinda Bennardi; Pietro Zoncheddu; Valentina Martinelli; Alessia Giaquinta; Pierfrancesco Veroux
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Patient and Clinician Perceptions of Informed Consent and Decision Making About Accepting KDPI > 85 Kidneys.

Authors:  Karolina Schantz; Elisa J Gordon; Unsun Lee; Maria Rocha; John Friedewald; Daniela P Ladner; Yolanda Becker; Richard Formica; Peter P Reese; Dixon Kaufman; Masoud Barah; Marissa Walker; Om Mehrotra; Dania Viveros; Sanjay Mehrotra
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-12-16

Review 5.  A scoping review of inequities in access to organ transplant in the United States.

Authors:  Christine Park; Mandisa-Maia Jones; Samantha Kaplan; Felicitas L Koller; Julius M Wilder; L Ebony Boulware; Lisa M McElroy
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2022-02-12

6.  Geospatial Analysis of Organ Transplant Referral Regions.

Authors:  Tyler Schappe; Sarah Peskoe; Nrupen Bhavsar; L Ebony Boulware; Jane Pendergast; Lisa M McElroy
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01

7.  Consent in organ transplantation: putting legal obligations and guidelines into practice.

Authors:  Farrah Raza; James Neuberger
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.834

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.