Literature DB >> 25738913

A review of culturally adapted versions of the Oswestry Disability Index: the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency.

Peter J Sheahan1, Erika J Nelson-Wong2, Steven L Fischer1.   

Abstract

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a self-report-based outcome measure used to quantify the extent of disability related to low back pain (LBP), a substantial contributor to workplace absenteeism. The ODI tool has been adapted for use by patients in several non-English speaking nations. It is unclear, however, if these adapted versions of the ODI are as credible as the original ODI developed for English-speaking nations. The objective of this study was to conduct a review of the literature to identify culturally adapted versions of the ODI and to report on the adaptation process, construct validity, test-retest reliability and internal consistency of these ODIs. Following a pragmatic review process, data were extracted from each study with regard to these four outcomes. While most studies applied adaptation processes in accordance with best-practice guidelines, there were some deviations. However, all studies reported high-quality psychometric properties: group mean construct validity was 0.734 ± 0.094 (indicated via a correlation coefficient), test-retest reliability was 0.937 ± 0.032 (indicated via an intraclass correlation coefficient) and internal consistency was 0.876 ± 0.047 (indicated via Cronbach's alpha). Researchers can be confident when using any of these culturally adapted ODIs, or when comparing and contrasting results between cultures where these versions were employed. Implications for Rehabilitation Low back pain is the second leading cause of disability in the world, behind only cancer. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) has been developed as a self-report outcome measure of low back pain for administration to patients. An understanding of the various cross-cultural adaptations of the ODI is important for more concerted multi-national research efforts. This review examines 16 cross-cultural adaptations of the ODI and should inform the work of health care and rehabilitation professionals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Construct validity; cross-cultural adaptation; internal consistency; oswestry disability index; test–retest reliability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25738913     DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1019647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  11 in total

1.  Posterior hip instability relocation testing: a resident's case report.

Authors:  Rich Maas; Scott Wallentine; Dale Gerke; Sam Crager; Jessica Stewart
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2017-05-02

2.  [Inpatient multimodal pain therapy : Additive value of neuromuscular core stability exercises for chronic back pain].

Authors:  F Giesche; H Streicher; M Maiwald; P Wagner
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  A Case-Series of Dry Needling as an Immediate Sensory Integration Intervention.

Authors:  Matt O'Neill; Adriaan Louw; Jessie Podalak; Nicholas Maiers; Terry Cox; Kory Zimney
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-12-13

4.  Cross-cultural adaptation of Cantonese (Hong Kong) Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1b.

Authors:  Karlen K P Law; P L Lee; W W Kwan; K C Mak; Keith D K Luk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Construct validity and responsiveness of commonly used patient reported outcome instruments in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Karthik Vishwanathan; Ian Braithwaite
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-01-13

6.  Risk factors of non-specific neck pain and low back pain in computer-using office workers in China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sunyue Ye; Qinglei Jing; Chen Wei; Jie Lu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Effectiveness of Operative and Nonoperative Care for Adult Spinal Deformity: Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Alisson R Teles; Tobias A Mattei; Orlando Righesso; Asdrubal Falavigna
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-05-01

8.  Urdu version of Oswestry disability index; a reliability and validity study.

Authors:  Fareeha Amjad; Mohammad A Mohseni-Bandpei; Syed Amir Gilani; Ashfaq Ahmad; Muhammad Waqas; Asif Hanif
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Psychometric evaluation of the Oswestry Disability Index in patients with chronic low back pain: factor and Mokken analyses.

Authors:  Chin-Pang Lee; Tsai-Sheng Fu; Chia-Yih Liu; Ching-I Hung
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Predicting EQ-5D-5L Utility Scores from the Oswestry Disability Index and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Thomas G Poder; Nathalie Carrier
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.133

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.