Melanie A van Os1, A Jeanine van der Ven2, C Emily Kleinrouweler2, Ewoud Schuit2, Brenda M Kazemier2, Corine J Verhoeven3, Esteriek de Miranda2, Aleid G van Wassenaer-Leemhuis4, J Marko Sikkema5, Mallory D Woiski6, Patrick M Bossuyt7, Eva Pajkrt2, Christianne J M de Groot1, Ben Willem J Mol8, Monique C Haak9. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Máxima Medisch Centrum, Veldhoven, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Neonatology, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ZGT, Almelo, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 8. The Robinson Institute, School of Paediatrics and Reproductive Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. 9. Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of vaginal progesterone in reducing adverse neonatal outcome due to preterm birth (PTB) in low-risk pregnant women with a short cervical length (CL). STUDY DESIGN:Women with a singleton pregnancy without a history of PTB underwent CL measurement at 18 to 22 weeks. Women with a CL ≤ 30 mm receivedvaginal progesterone or placebo. Primary outcome was adverse neonatal outcome, defined as a composite of respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intracerebral hemorrhage > grade II, necrotizing enterocolitis > stage 1, proven sepsis, or death before discharge. Secondary outcomes included time to delivery, PTB before 32, 34, and 37 weeks of gestation. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS:Between 2009 and 2013, 20,234 women were screened. A CL of 30 mm or less was seen in 375 women (1.8%). In 151 women, a CL ≤ 30 mm was confirmed with a second measurement and 80 of these women agreed to participate in the trial. We randomly allocated 41 women to progesterone and 39 to placebo. Adverse neonatal outcomes occurred in two (5.0%) women in the progesterone and in four (11%) women in the control group (relative risk [RR], 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-2.4). The use of progesterone resulted in a nonsignificant reduction of PTB < 32 weeks (2.0 vs. 8.0%; RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.04-3.0) and < 34 weeks (7.0 vs. 10%; RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.18-3.1) but not on PTB < 37 weeks (15 vs. 13%; RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.39-3.5). CONCLUSION: In women with a short cervix, who are otherwise low risk, we could not show a significant benefit of progesterone in reducing adverse neonatal outcome and PTB. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of vaginal progesterone in reducing adverse neonatal outcome due to preterm birth (PTB) in low-risk pregnant women with a short cervical length (CL). STUDY DESIGN:Women with a singleton pregnancy without a history of PTB underwent CL measurement at 18 to 22 weeks. Women with a CL ≤ 30 mm received vaginal progesterone or placebo. Primary outcome was adverse neonatal outcome, defined as a composite of respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intracerebral hemorrhage > grade II, necrotizing enterocolitis > stage 1, proven sepsis, or death before discharge. Secondary outcomes included time to delivery, PTB before 32, 34, and 37 weeks of gestation. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2013, 20,234 women were screened. A CL of 30 mm or less was seen in 375 women (1.8%). In 151 women, a CL ≤ 30 mm was confirmed with a second measurement and 80 of these women agreed to participate in the trial. We randomly allocated 41 women to progesterone and 39 to placebo. Adverse neonatal outcomes occurred in two (5.0%) women in the progesterone and in four (11%) women in the control group (relative risk [RR], 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09-2.4). The use of progesterone resulted in a nonsignificant reduction of PTB < 32 weeks (2.0 vs. 8.0%; RR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.04-3.0) and < 34 weeks (7.0 vs. 10%; RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.18-3.1) but not on PTB < 37 weeks (15 vs. 13%; RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.39-3.5). CONCLUSION: In women with a short cervix, who are otherwise low risk, we could not show a significant benefit of progesterone in reducing adverse neonatal outcome and PTB. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
Authors: Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Roberto Romero; Eduardo Da Fonseca; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; George W Creasy; Sonia S Hassan; Offer Erez; Percy Pacora; Kypros H Nicolaides Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-04-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Lindsay M Kindinger; Phillip R Bennett; Yun S Lee; Julian R Marchesi; Ann Smith; Stefano Cacciatore; Elaine Holmes; Jeremy K Nicholson; T G Teoh; David A MacIntyre Journal: Microbiome Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 14.650
Authors: Maud D van Zijl; Bouchra Koullali; Christiana A Naaktgeboren; Ewoud Schuit; Dick J Bekedam; Etelka Moll; Martijn A Oudijk; Wilhelmina M van Baal; Marjon A de Boer; Henricus Visser; Joris van Drongelen; Flip W van de Made; Karlijn C Vollebregt; Moira A Muller; Mireille N Bekker; Jozien T J Brons; Marieke Sueters; Josje Langenveld; Maureen T Franssen; Nico W Schuitemaker; Erik van Beek; Hubertina C J Scheepers; Karin de Boer; Eveline M Tepe; Anjoke J M Huisjes; Angelo B Hooker; Evelyn C J Verheijen; Dimitri N Papatsonis; Ben Willem J Mol; Brenda M Kazemier; Eva Pajkrt Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2017-09-04 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: R Romero; K H Nicolaides; A Conde-Agudelo; J M O'Brien; E Cetingoz; E Da Fonseca; G W Creasy; S S Hassan Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-07-19 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: C J J Cuijpers; J Van't Hooft; C Schneeberger; J H Van Der Lee; N E Simons; M A Van Os; J Van Der Ven; C J M De Groot; B W J Mol; A G Van Wassenaer-Leemhuis Journal: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Date: 2021-02-12 Impact factor: 7.299
Authors: Roberto Romero; Agustin Conde-Agudelo; Eduardo Da Fonseca; John M O'Brien; Elcin Cetingoz; George W Creasy; Sonia S Hassan; Kypros H Nicolaides Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: P Kuusela; B Jacobsson; H Hagberg; H Fadl; P Lindgren; J Wesström; U-B Wennerholm; L Valentin Journal: BJOG Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 7.331