Literature DB >> 25738743

Comparative digestibility of energy and nutrients in diets fed to sows and growing pigs.

Jessica E Lowell1, Yanhong Liu, Hans H Stein.   

Abstract

The objective of this research was to compare values for digestible energy (DE) and metabolisable energy (ME) and apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of nutrients in 11 diets fed to both growing pigs and gestating sows. Three diets were based on corn, wheat or sorghum and eight diets were based on a combination of corn and soybean meal, canola meal, conventional distillers' dried grains with solubles, low-fat distillers' dried grains with solubles, corn germ meal, corn bran, wheat middlings or soybean hulls. A total of 88 gestating sows (252 ± 24.2 kg BW; parity two to six) and 88 growing barrows (40 ± 4.7 kg BW) were used and randomly allotted to the 11 diets with eight replicate sows or pigs per diet. Faecal and urine samples were collected for 4 d following a 19 d adaptation period. The DE, ME and ATTD of gross energy (GE), acid detergent fibre (ADF), neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and crude protein (CP) in the 11 diets were calculated. Gestating sows had greater (p < 0.05) ATTD of GE and CP and DE values for all diets compared with growing pigs. Gestating sows also had greater (p < 0.05) ME values than growing pigs for the three grain diets and the diets containing wheat middlings and soybean hulls. No differences were observed in ATTD of ADF and NDF between gestating sows and growing pigs for any of the diets, except that gestating sows had greater (p < 0.05) ATTD of NDF than growing pigs when they were fed the four protein diets. The ATTD of GE and CP and DE values in gestating sows may be predicted by using equations generated from the values of ATTD of GE and CP and DE values obtained in growing pigs. Results of this research indicate that ATTD values of CP and GE obtained in gestating sows are greater than the values obtained in growing pigs, but values for ATTD of ADF obtained in growing pigs are not different from values in gestating sows.

Entities:  

Keywords:  digestibility; energy; gestation; growth period; nutrients; pigs; prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25738743     DOI: 10.1080/1745039X.2015.1013664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Anim Nutr        ISSN: 1477-2817            Impact factor:   2.242


  6 in total

1.  Concentration of digestible and metabolizable energy, standardized ileal digestibility, and growth performance of pigs fed diets containing sorghum produced in the United States or corn produced in China.

Authors:  L Pan; Q H Shang; Y Wu; X K Ma; S F Long; L Liu; D F Li; X S Piao
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Impact of four fiber-rich supplements on nutrient digestibility, colostrum production, and farrowing performance in sows.

Authors:  Takele Feyera; Liang Hu; Maria Eskildsen; Thomas S Bruun; Peter K Theil
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

Review 3.  Alternative prediction methods of protein and energy evaluation of pig feeds.

Authors:  Ewa Święch
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-05-03

4.  Metabolic Responses of Dietary Fiber during Heat Stress: Effects on Reproductive Performance and Stress Level of Gestating Sows.

Authors:  SeungMin Oh; Abdolreza Hosseindoust; SangHun Ha; Joseph Moturi; JunYoung Mun; Habeeb Tajudeen; JinSoo Kim
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2022-03-23

5.  Effects of adaptation time and inclusion level of sugar beet pulp on nutrient digestibility and evaluation of ileal amino acid digestibility in pigs

Authors:  Ze Yu Zhang; Shuai Zhang; Chang Hua Lai; Jin Biao Zhao; Jian Jun Zang; Cheng Fei Huang
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 2.509

6.  Effects of Different Crude Protein and Dietary Fiber Levels on the Comparative Energy and Nutrient Utilization in Sows and Growing Pigs.

Authors:  Wenxuan Dong; Gang Zhang; Zhongchao Li; Ling Liu; Shuai Zhang; Defa Li
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.