Literature DB >> 25738236

Pythium insidiosum keratitis: clinical profile and role of DNA sequencing and zoospore formation in diagnosis.

Savitri Sharma1, Praveen K Balne, Swapna R Motukupally, Sujata Das, Prashant Garg, Srikant K Sahu, Kotakonda Arunasri, Kodiganti Manjulatha, Dilip K Mishra, Sisinthy Shivaji.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the molecular and microbiological diagnosis and clinical profile of 13 patients with Pythium insidiosum keratitis.
METHODS: Phase 1 of the study consisted of DNA sequencing of the ITS region of the rDNA of 162 stocked morphologically unidentified nonconsecutive fungal isolates from corneal scraping of patients with keratitis (2010-2012). Blast and phylogenetic analyses of the sequences showed 9 to be P. insidiosum. A retrospective review of archived photographs of colony and direct microscopy of corneal scrapings and clinical records of the cases were performed. Phase 2 began in 2014, in which a simple method of zoospore formation was used for fungal colonies resembling those of P. insidiosum followed by DNA sequencing.
RESULTS: The prevalence of P. insidiosum among unidentified fungal isolates from keratitis was 9/162 (5.5%) in phase 1. In phase 2, 4/102 cases (3.9%) of fungal keratitis were identified as P. insidiosum (January-February, 2014). Phylogenetic analysis of all 13 fungal isolates confirmed the identification of P. insidiosum. Corneal infiltrates exhibited hyphate edges, tentacle-like extensions, and dot-like infiltrates surrounding the main infiltrate. Response to topical 5% natamycin eye drops with or without oral antifungals was poor (penetrating keratoplasty: 9 and evisceration: 2) with a mean follow-up period of 82 days.
CONCLUSIONS: P. insidiosum keratitis needs to be considered in the differential diagnosis of severe fungal keratitis. It can be identified using the zoospore formation method and confirmed by ITS DNA sequencing. Lack of response to currently used antifungal drugs calls for evaluation of newer drugs for medical therapy and consideration for early penetrating keratoplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25738236     DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  16 in total

1.  Monitoring Anti-Pythium insidiosum IgG Antibodies and (1→3)-β-d-Glucan in Vascular Pythiosis.

Authors:  Navaporn Worasilchai; Nitipong Permpalung; Pakawat Chongsathidkiet; Asada Leelahavanichkul; Alberto Leonel Mendoza; Tanapat Palaga; Rangsima Reantragoon; Malcolm Finkelman; Pranee Sutcharitchan; Ariya Chindamporn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Pythium insidiosum Keratitis: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Bharat Gurnani; Kirandeep Kaur; Shweta Agarwal; Vaitheeswaran G Lalgudi; Nakul S Shekhawat; Anitha Venugopal; Koushik Tripathy; Bhaskar Srinivasan; Geetha Iyer; Joseph Gubert
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 3.  Diagnosis and Treatment of Pythium Insidiosum Corneal Ulcer in a Chinese Child: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Hong He; Hongshan Liu; Xiaolian Chen; Jiaochan Wu; Miao He; Xingwu Zhong
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2016-12-27

4.  Successful medical management of Pythium insidiosum keratitis using a combination of minocycline, linezolid, and chloramphenicol.

Authors:  Sayo Maeno; Yoshinori Oie; Atsuko Sunada; Honami Tanibuchi; Shigehiro Hagiwara; Koichi Makimura; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2019-06-18

5.  Pythium keratitis in South India: Incidence, clinical profile, management, and treatment recommendation.

Authors:  Ravula Hasika; Prajna Lalitha; Naveen Radhakrishnan; Gunasekaran Rameshkumar; N Venkatesh Prajna; Muthiah Srinivasan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Commentary: Pythium insidiosum keratitis.

Authors:  Prashant Garg
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Commentary: Pseudopestalotiopsis theae keratitis.

Authors:  Prashant Garg
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 8.  Review of methods and antimicrobial agents for susceptibility testing against Pythium insidiosum.

Authors:  Hanna Yolanda; Theerapong Krajaejun
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-04-12

Review 9.  Pythium insidiosum keratitis - A review.

Authors:  Bharat Gurnani; Kirandeep Kaur; Anitha Venugopal; Bhaskar Srinivasan; Bhupesh Bagga; Geetha Iyer; Josephine Christy; Lalitha Prajna; Murugesan Vanathi; Prashant Garg; Shivanand Narayana; Shweta Agarwal; Srikant Sahu
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.969

Review 10.  Recent advances in diagnosis and management of Mycotic Keratitis.

Authors:  Prafulla K Maharana; Namrata Sharma; Ritu Nagpal; Vishal Jhanji; Sujata Das; Rasik B Vajpayee
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.