Literature DB >> 25738057

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of developmental delay in pediatric patients.

Althaf S Ali1, Naziya P Syed2, G S N Murthy3, Madhavi Nori4, Anand Abkari3, B K Pooja5, J Venkateswarlu6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Developmental delay is defined as significant delay in one or more developmental domains. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the best modality to investigate such patients. Evaluation of a child with developmental delay is important not only because it allows early diagnosis and treatment but also helpful for parental counseling regarding the outcome of their child and to identify any possible risk of recurrence in the siblings. Thus this study was undertaken to evaluate the developmental delay in Indian children which will help the clinicians in providing an estimation of the child's ultimate developmental potential and organize specific treatment requirement and also relieve parental apprehension. AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence of normal and abnormal MRI in pediatric patients presenting with developmental delay and further categorize the abnormal MRI based on its morphological features.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: It is a prospective, observational & descriptive study of MRI Brain in 81 paediatric patients (46 Males and 35 Females), aged between three months to 12 years; presenting with developmental delay in Deccan College of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad; over a period of three years (Sept 2011 to Sept 2014). MRI brain was done on 1.5T Siemens Magnetom Essenza & 0.35T Magnetom C with appropriate sequences and planes after making the child sleep/sedated/ anesthetized. Various anatomical structures like Ventricles, Corpus callosum, etc were systematically assessed. The MRI findings were divided into various aetiological subgroups.
RESULTS: Normal MRI findings were seen in 32% cases and 68% had abnormal findings of which the proportion of Traumatic/ Neurovascular Diseases, Congenital & Developmental, Metabolic and Degenerative, neoplastic and non specific were 31%, 17%, 10%, 2.5% and 7.5% respectively. The ventricles and white matter mainly the corpus callosum were the most commonly affected anatomical structures. The diagnostic yield was found to be 68% and higher yield was seen in patients presenting with developmental delay plus.
CONCLUSION: The clinical diagnosis of developmental delay should not be the end point, but rather a springboard for an effective search for causal factors. MRI is the best investigation with a high yield in such patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Developmental delay; MRI brain; Pediatric patients

Year:  2015        PMID: 25738057      PMCID: PMC4347148          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/11921.5478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  15 in total

Review 1.  Investigation of global developmental delay.

Authors:  L McDonald; A Rennie; J Tolmie; P Galloway; R McWilliam
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Physical, motor, sensory and developmental features associated with agenesis of the corpus callosum.

Authors:  P Moes; K Schilmoeller; G Schilmoeller
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 2.508

3.  Evaluation children with global developmental delay: a prospective study at sultan qaboos university hospital, oman.

Authors:  Roshan Koul; Mohammed Al-Yahmedy; Amna Al-Futaisi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2012-07

Review 4.  Developmental neuroimaging of children using magnetic resonance techniques.

Authors:  M J Rivkin
Journal:  Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev       Date:  2000

5.  Analysis and classification of cerebellar malformations.

Authors:  Sandeep Patel; A James Barkovich
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Neuroimaging in mental retardation.

Authors:  Amita Pandey; Shubha R Phadke; Neerja Gupta; R V Phadke
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.967

7.  White matter abnormalities in children with idiopathic developmental delay.

Authors:  E Widjaja; D Nilsson; S Blaser; C Raybaud
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.990

8.  Practice parameter: evaluation of the child with global developmental delay: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and The Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society.

Authors:  M Shevell; S Ashwal; D Donley; J Flint; M Gingold; D Hirtz; A Majnemer; M Noetzel; R D Sheth
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 9.  Diagnostic evaluation of developmental delay/mental retardation: An overview.

Authors:  Agatino Battaglia; John C Carey
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

10.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging findings in developmentally delayed children.

Authors:  Ali Akbar Momen; Gholamreza Jelodar; Hamid Dehdashti
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2011-11-02
View more
  4 in total

1.  Genetic Approach to Diagnosis of Intellectual Disability.

Authors:  Ratna Dua Puri; Moni Tuteja; I C Verma
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Evaluation of Pediatric Patients With Developmental Delay: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Harneet S Randhawa; Sachin Bagale; Rajesh Umap; Jasneet Randhawa
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-11

3.  Does diffusion restriction changes in magnetic resonance imaging predict neurological outcome in neonatal seizures?

Authors:  Manipriya Ravindran; Prakash Amborium; B Umamaheswari; Gokul Ramani; Binu Ninan
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

4.  Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Patients with Developmental Delay in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tewodros Endale Balcha; Abebe Mekonnen Woldeyohannes; Getachew Assefa Neknek
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2022-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.