Prashant Gupta1, Vineeta Khare2, Deepak Kumar3, Abrar Ahmad4, Gopa Banerjee5, Mastan Singh6. 1. Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, King George's Medical University , Lucknow, U.P, India . 2. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Era's Lucknow Medical College , Sarfarajganj, Hardoi Road, U.P, India . 3. Resident Doctor, Department of Microbiology, King George's Medical University , Lucknow, U.P, India . 4. Junior Research Fellow, Department of Microbiology, King George's Medical University , Lucknow, U.P, India . 5. Professor, Department of Microbiology, King George's Medical University , Lucknow, U.P, India . 6. Head of the Department, Department of Microbiology, King George's Medical University , Lucknow, U.P, India .
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical importance of Aspergillus has increased over the past few decades because of rise in immunosuppressive drugs and immune-modulating diseases. Antifungal susceptibility of Aspergillus is rarely performed by clinical laboratories because of lack of easier method. This study has investigated and compared susceptibility pattern of Aspergillus isolates by disc diffusion, E-test and broth micro-dilution for amphotericin B, voriconazole and caspofungin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Disk diffusion (DD) method of antifungal susceptibility (AFS) was evaluated for three different classes of antifungals: amphotericin B (AMB), voriconazole (VCZ) and caspofungin (CAS). Forty four clinical isolates of Aspergillus were selected; these included 34 A.fumigatus, 8 A.flavus and 2 A. terreus. AFS by DD and E-test was done on non-supplemented Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) and was compared to Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute(CLSI) broth micro-dilution (BMD) method of AFS. RESULTS: Disk diffusion method for amphotericin B showed 87.5% agreement while E-test showed 93.8% agreement with broth micro-dilution. The agreement with broth micro-dilution was similar for both disk diffusion and E-test in case of voriconazole (93.8%) and caspofungin (100%). 31.8% and 9.1% Aspergillus isolates were found to have amphotericin B and voriconazole MIC values above epidemiological cut off value (ECV) respectively. All isolates were within ECV for caspofungin. CONCLUSION: CLSI method of DD promises to be easier, reproducible and cost effective method of susceptibility testing, but this method must be interpreted with caution in case of amphotericin B susceptibility testing. E-test correlates better than DD with BMD.
BACKGROUND: Clinical importance of Aspergillus has increased over the past few decades because of rise in immunosuppressive drugs and immune-modulating diseases. Antifungal susceptibility of Aspergillus is rarely performed by clinical laboratories because of lack of easier method. This study has investigated and compared susceptibility pattern of Aspergillus isolates by disc diffusion, E-test and broth micro-dilution for amphotericin B, voriconazole and caspofungin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Disk diffusion (DD) method of antifungal susceptibility (AFS) was evaluated for three different classes of antifungals: amphotericin B (AMB), voriconazole (VCZ) and caspofungin (CAS). Forty four clinical isolates of Aspergillus were selected; these included 34 A.fumigatus, 8 A.flavus and 2 A. terreus. AFS by DD and E-test was done on non-supplemented Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) and was compared to Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute(CLSI) broth micro-dilution (BMD) method of AFS. RESULTS: Disk diffusion method for amphotericin B showed 87.5% agreement while E-test showed 93.8% agreement with broth micro-dilution. The agreement with broth micro-dilution was similar for both disk diffusion and E-test in case of voriconazole (93.8%) and caspofungin (100%). 31.8% and 9.1% Aspergillus isolates were found to have amphotericin B and voriconazole MIC values above epidemiological cut off value (ECV) respectively. All isolates were within ECV for caspofungin. CONCLUSION: CLSI method of DD promises to be easier, reproducible and cost effective method of susceptibility testing, but this method must be interpreted with caution in case of amphotericin B susceptibility testing. E-test correlates better than DD with BMD.
Authors: A Espinel-Ingroff; B Arthington-Skaggs; N Iqbal; D Ellis; M A Pfaller; S Messer; M Rinaldi; A Fothergill; D L Gibbs; A Wang Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2007-04-11 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: J Gavaldà; Y Meije; J Fortún; E Roilides; F Saliba; O Lortholary; P Muñoz; P Grossi; M Cuenca-Estrella Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Shivaprakash M Rudramurthy; Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi; Manpreet Dhaliwal; Arunaloke Chakrabarti; Jacques F Meis; Johan W Mouton Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-12-27 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: S Dellière; L Verdurme; J Bigot; E Dannaoui; Y Senghor; F Botterel; A Fekkar; M E Bougnoux; C Hennequin; J Guitard Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Ana Alastruey-Izquierdo; Marcia S C Melhem; Lucas X Bonfietti; Juan L Rodriguez-Tudela Journal: Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 1.846
Authors: Hanaa S Omar; Soheir N Abd El-Rahman; Sheikha M AlGhannam; Nour El-Houda A. Reyad; Mohamed S Sedeek Journal: Molecules Date: 2021-10-10 Impact factor: 4.927
Authors: Joseph Nyandwi; Sébastien Manirakiza; Eugàne Ndirahisha; Jean Baptiste Ngomirakiza; Désiré Nisubire; Emmanuel Nduwayo; Hélàne Bukuru Journal: East Afr Health Res J Date: 2017-03-01