Alper Eken1, Bulent Soyupak2, Meltem Acil3, Taner Arpaci4, Tugana Akbas4. 1. Acibadem University Vocational School of Health Services, Department of Urology, Adana, Turkey; 2. Acibadem Adana Hospital Department of Urology, Adana, Turkey; 3. Acibadem University Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Adana, Turkey; 4. Acibadem University Vocational School of Health Services, Department of Radiology, Adana, Turkey.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We compare and evaluate the safety, efficacy, and short-term outcomes of the new GreenLight XPS 180W (GL-XPS) laser system with the former generation GreenLight HPS 120W (GL-HPS) system for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a prospective nonrandomized single-centre study. METHODS: From May 2012 to June 2013, 161 consecutive patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH were included: 88 patients were treated with the GL-HPS system and 73 were treated with the GL-XPS system. The perioperative variables International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL), and maximum flow rate (Qmax) were recorded at baseline, at one month and 6 months. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was assessed at baseline. RESULTS: The mean age was 70.2 years in the GL-HPS group and 68.6 years in the GL-XPS group. Prostate volumes were 62.3 mL and 61.3 mL, respectively. Both groups showed significant postoperative improvement in the IPSS, QOL, Qmax variables compared to baseline levels. There were no significant differences in improvement in IPSS and QOL between groups. However, both operating and catheterization times were shorter in patients in the GL-XPS group. The overall postoperative complication rate was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both GreenLight systems provide safe, effective tissue vaporization with significant clinical relief of BPH obstruction. The GL-XPS system appears more favourable with regard to reduced operating and hospitalization time, suggesting more cost-effective and efficient tissue removal.
INTRODUCTION: We compare and evaluate the safety, efficacy, and short-term outcomes of the new GreenLight XPS 180W (GL-XPS) laser system with the former generation GreenLight HPS 120W (GL-HPS) system for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a prospective nonrandomized single-centre study. METHODS: From May 2012 to June 2013, 161 consecutive patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to BPH were included: 88 patients were treated with the GL-HPS system and 73 were treated with the GL-XPS system. The perioperative variables International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL), and maximum flow rate (Qmax) were recorded at baseline, at one month and 6 months. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was assessed at baseline. RESULTS: The mean age was 70.2 years in the GL-HPS group and 68.6 years in the GL-XPS group. Prostate volumes were 62.3 mL and 61.3 mL, respectively. Both groups showed significant postoperative improvement in the IPSS, QOL, Qmax variables compared to baseline levels. There were no significant differences in improvement in IPSS and QOL between groups. However, both operating and catheterization times were shorter in patients in the GL-XPS group. The overall postoperative complication rate was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both GreenLight systems provide safe, effective tissue vaporization with significant clinical relief of BPH obstruction. The GL-XPS system appears more favourable with regard to reduced operating and hospitalization time, suggesting more cost-effective and efficient tissue removal.
Authors: Pierre-Alain Hueber; Daniel Liberman; Tal Ben-Zvi; Henry Woo; Mahmood A Hai; Alexis E Te; Bilal Chughtai; Richard Lee; Matthew Rutman; Ricardo R Gonzalez; Neil Barber; Naif Al-Hathal; Talal Al-Qaoud; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Kevin C Zorn Journal: Urology Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Carlos Capitán; Cristina Blázquez; M Dolores Martin; Virginia Hernández; Enrique de la Peña; Carlos Llorente Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Reza S Malek; Hyun Wook Kang; Yihlih Steven Peng; Douglas Stinson; Michael T Beck; Ed Koullick Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-12-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Elmar Heinrich; Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl; Patrick Honeck; Peter Alken; Thomas Knoll; Maurice Stephan Michel; Axel Häcker Journal: J Endourol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Robin Ruszat; Stephen Wyler; Hans-Helge Seifert; Oliver Reich; Thomas Forster; Tullio Sulser; Alexander Bachmann Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2006-01-31 Impact factor: 20.096