Literature DB >> 2573769

Drug companies' evidence to justify advertising.

V A Wade1, P R Mansfield, P J McDonald.   

Abstract

Ten international pharmaceutical companies were asked by letter to supply their best evidence in support of marketing claims for seventeen products. Fifteen replies were received. Seven replies cited a total of 67 references: 31 contained relevant original data and only 13 were controlled trials, all of which had serious methodological flaws. There were four reports of changes in advertising claims and one company ceased marketing nikethamide in the third world. Standards of evidence used to justify advertising claims are inadequate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2573769     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91862-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  4 in total

1.  Pharmaceutical company internet sites as sources of information about antidepressant medications.

Authors:  Mark A Graber; Michelle Weckmann
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Killing me softly: myth in pharmaceutical advertising.

Authors:  Tim Scott; Neil Stanford; David R Thompson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-12-18

3.  Autonomy, consent, and limiting healthcare costs.

Authors:  M A Graber; J F Tansey
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Sources of information for new drugs among physicians in Thailand.

Authors:  Maneerat R Layton; Wanapa Sritanyarat; Supatra Chadbunchachai; Albert I Wertheimer
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2007-08-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.