Literature DB >> 25736832

Robotic Nudges: The Ethics of Engineering a More Socially Just Human Being.

Jason Borenstein1, Ron Arkin2.   

Abstract

Robots are becoming an increasingly pervasive feature of our personal lives. As a result, there is growing importance placed on examining what constitutes appropriate behavior when they interact with human beings. In this paper, we discuss whether companion robots should be permitted to "nudge" their human users in the direction of being "more ethical". More specifically, we use Rawlsian principles of justice to illustrate how robots might nurture "socially just" tendencies in their human counterparts. Designing technological artifacts in such a way to influence human behavior is already well-established but merely because the practice is commonplace does not necessarily resolve the ethical issues associated with its implementation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomy; Design ethics; Nudges; Paternalism; Rawls; Robot companions; Robot ethics; Social justice

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25736832     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9636-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  7 in total

Review 1.  The ethics of enabling technology.

Authors:  Sven Ove Hansson
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Egalitarianism and moral bioenhancement.

Authors:  Robert Sparrow
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  The intervention of robot caregivers and the cultivation of children's capability to play.

Authors:  Yvette Pearson; Jason Borenstein
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business.

Authors:  Dan Ariely; Gregory S Berns
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks.

Authors:  Adam D I Kramer; Jamie E Guillory; Jeffrey T Hancock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Egalitarianism in young children.

Authors:  Ernst Fehr; Helen Bernhard; Bettina Rockenbach
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Getting moral enhancement right: the desirability of moral bioenhancement.

Authors:  Ingmar Persson; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 1.898

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Social robotics and the modulation of social perception and bias.

Authors:  Joshua Skewes; David M Amodio; Johanna Seibt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  What Do We Have to Lose? Offloading Through Moral Technologies: Moral Struggle and Progress.

Authors:  Lily Eva Frank
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Who Wants to Grant Robots Rights?

Authors:  Maartje M A De Graaf; Frank A Hindriks; Koen V Hindriks
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2022-01-13

4.  Gender Bias and Conversational Agents: an ethical perspective on Social Robotics.

Authors:  Fabio Fossa; Irene Sucameli
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 3.777

5.  Why a Virtual Assistant for Moral Enhancement When We Could have a Socrates?

Authors:  Francisco Lara
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Teasing out Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: An Ethical Critique of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Medicine.

Authors:  Mark Henderson Arnold
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.216

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.