Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou1, Joel Greenbowe2, Ziad U Khan3, Michele C Azada3, Jeffrey S Ross4, Phil J Stevens2, Siraj M Ali2, Vincent A Miller2, Barbara Gitlitz5. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA 92868, United States; Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA 92868, United States. Electronic address: Ignatius.ou@uci.edu. 2. Foundation Medicine Inc., 150 Second Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, United States. 3. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA 92868, United States; Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA 92868, United States. 4. Foundation Medicine Inc., 150 Second Street, Cambridge, MA 02141, United States; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY 12208, United States. 5. USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center and Hospital, Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Acquired resistance mutations to anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors such as crizotinib and alectinib have been documented in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring ALK rearrangement (ALK+). Of note I1171T/N/S mutations in the ALK kinase domain have recently been described by several groups to confer resistance to alectinib, a second-generation ALK inhibitor. Additionally one of these reports demonstrated one ALK+ NSCLC patient harboring an I1171T acquired mutation has responded to ceritinib, another second-generation ALK inhibitor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reported the presence of an ALK I1171N resistance mutation from comprehensive genomic profiling from a liver biopsy of a progressing metastatic lesion in an ALK+ patient on alectinib after an initial partial response. The patient then responded to ceritinib 750 mg orally once daily but required dose reduction to 600 mg once daily. She initially had grade 3 elevation of liver enzymes from crizotinib necessitating the original switch to alectinib but experienced no transaminase elevations with alectinib or ceritinib. CONCLUSIONS: This is the fifth patient case to date demonstrating that ALK I1171 mutation confers resistance to alectinib and the second reported case of ALK I1171 mutation being sensitivity to ceritinib. Substitutions of isoleucine at amino acid 1171 in the ALK kinase domain may distinguish which second generation ALK inhibitor will be effective after crizotinib failure. This case also provides evidence that transaminase elevations is likely a unique adverse event associated with crizotinib and unlikely a "class" effect involving all ALK inhibitors.
OBJECTIVES: Acquired resistance mutations to anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors such as crizotinib and alectinib have been documented in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring ALK rearrangement (ALK+). Of note I1171T/N/S mutations in the ALK kinase domain have recently been described by several groups to confer resistance to alectinib, a second-generation ALK inhibitor. Additionally one of these reports demonstrated one ALK+ NSCLCpatient harboring an I1171T acquired mutation has responded to ceritinib, another second-generation ALK inhibitor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reported the presence of an ALKI1171N resistance mutation from comprehensive genomic profiling from a liver biopsy of a progressing metastatic lesion in an ALK+ patient on alectinib after an initial partial response. The patient then responded to ceritinib 750 mg orally once daily but required dose reduction to 600 mg once daily. She initially had grade 3 elevation of liver enzymes from crizotinib necessitating the original switch to alectinib but experienced no transaminase elevations with alectinib or ceritinib. CONCLUSIONS: This is the fifth patient case to date demonstrating that ALK I1171 mutation confers resistance to alectinib and the second reported case of ALK I1171 mutation being sensitivity to ceritinib. Substitutions of isoleucine at amino acid 1171 in the ALK kinase domain may distinguish which second generation ALK inhibitor will be effective after crizotinib failure. This case also provides evidence that transaminase elevations is likely a unique adverse event associated with crizotinib and unlikely a "class" effect involving all ALK inhibitors.
Authors: Justin F Gainor; Leila Dardaei; Satoshi Yoda; Luc Friboulet; Ignaty Leshchiner; Ryohei Katayama; Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack; Shirish Gadgeel; Katherine Schultz; Manrose Singh; Emily Chin; Melissa Parks; Dana Lee; Richard H DiCecca; Elizabeth Lockerman; Tiffany Huynh; Jennifer Logan; Lauren L Ritterhouse; Long P Le; Ashok Muniappan; Subba Digumarthy; Colleen Channick; Colleen Keyes; Gad Getz; Dora Dias-Santagata; Rebecca S Heist; Jochen Lennerz; Lecia V Sequist; Cyril H Benes; A John Iafrate; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Jeffrey A Engelman; Alice T Shaw Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2016-07-18 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Vivek Subbiah; Oliver Holmes; Kyle Gowen; Daniel Spritz; Behrang Amini; Wei-Lien Wang; Alexa B Schrock; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ralph Zinner; Sarina Piha-Paul; Maria Zarzour; Julia A Elvin; Rachel L Erlich; David L Stockman; Jo-Anne Vergilio; James H Suh; Philip J Stephens; Vincent Miller; Jeffrey S Ross; Siraj M Ali Journal: Oncology Date: 2016-10-21 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Caroline E McCoach; Anh T Le; Katherine Gowan; Kenneth Jones; Laura Schubert; Andrea Doak; Adriana Estrada-Bernal; Kurtis D Davies; Daniel T Merrick; Paul A Bunn; W Tom Purcell; Rafal Dziadziuszko; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Dara L Aisner; D Ross Camidge; Robert C Doebele Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-04-10 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Paul G Kemps; Jennifer Picarsic; Benjamin H Durham; Zofia Hélias-Rodzewicz; Laura Hiemcke-Jiwa; Cor van den Bos; Marianne D van de Wetering; Carel J M van Noesel; Jan A M van Laar; Robert M Verdijk; Uta E Flucke; Pancras C W Hogendoorn; F J Sherida H Woei-A-Jin; Raf Sciot; Andreas Beilken; Friedrich Feuerhake; Martin Ebinger; Robert Möhle; Falko Fend; Antje Bornemann; Verena Wiegering; Karen Ernestus; Tina Méry; Olga Gryniewicz-Kwiatkowska; Bozenna Dembowska-Baginska; Dmitry A Evseev; Vsevolod Potapenko; Vadim V Baykov; Stefania Gaspari; Sabrina Rossi; Marco Gessi; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Sébastien Héritier; Jean Donadieu; Jacinthe Bonneau-Lagacherie; Claire Lamaison; Laure Farnault; Sylvie Fraitag; Marie-Laure Jullié; Julien Haroche; Matthew Collin; Jackie Allotey; Majid Madni; Kerry Turner; Susan Picton; Pasquale M Barbaro; Alysa Poulin; Ingrid S Tam; Dina El Demellawy; Brianna Empringham; James A Whitlock; Aditya Raghunathan; Amy A Swanson; Mariko Suchi; Jon M Brandt; Nabeel R Yaseen; Joanna L Weinstein; Irem Eldem; Bryan A Sisk; Vaishnavi Sridhar; Mandy Atkinson; Lucas R Massoth; Jason L Hornick; Sanda Alexandrescu; Kee Kiat Yeo; Kseniya Petrova-Drus; Stephen Z Peeke; Laura S Muñoz-Arcos; Daniel G Leino; David D Grier; Robert Lorsbach; Somak Roy; Ashish R Kumar; Shipra Garg; Nishant Tiwari; Kristian T Schafernak; Michael M Henry; Astrid G S van Halteren; Oussama Abla; Eli L Diamond; Jean-François Emile Journal: Blood Date: 2022-01-13 Impact factor: 22.113