Isuru Ranasinghe1, Federica Barzi2, David Brieger3, Martin Gallagher4. 1. The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia. 2. The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. 3. The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia Concord Repatriation & General Hospital, Sydney, Australia. 4. The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Concord Repatriation & General Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Interhospital transfer of patients admitted with an acute myocardial infarction for specialised care is common and costly. However, the long-term mortality of transferred patients compared with patients solely treated at the presenting hospital has not been evaluated. Here, we assess the long-term mortality of patients who undergo interhospital transfer during their acute myocardial infarction admission. METHODS: We evaluated 40 482 patients with a ICD10-AM diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals in New South Wales, Australia, from 2004 to 2008, of whom 10 107 (25%) were transferred. We compared in-hospital and mortality up to 5.5 years postdischarge among transferred and non-transferred patients. We created a 1:1 propensity score matched cohort (n=16 854; 8427 per group) to account for selection bias. RESULTS: In the matched cohort, transferred patients were more likely to undergo revascularisation (55.6% vs 13.7%, RR 4.05; 95% CI 3.83 to 4.29) and had lower mortality at 30 days (3.5% vs 5.7%, HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.70), 1 year (7.5% vs 12.6%, HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.64) and at the end of follow-up (15.3% vs 22.5%, HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.70) than patients treated in presenting hospitals. With the exception of transfers originating from revascularisation capable hospitals, these findings were consistent across a range of subgroups, including patients of all ages, ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients, and transfers originating from hospitals in regional and major city areas. Sensitivity analyses showed that these findings are unlikely to be due to survival bias or to confounding by unmeasured variables. CONCLUSIONS: Patients hospitalised for an acute myocardial infarction who are transferred to one or more hospitals for specialised care have higher rates of coronary revascularisation and experience lower long-term mortality. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
BACKGROUND: Interhospital transfer of patients admitted with an acute myocardial infarction for specialised care is common and costly. However, the long-term mortality of transferred patients compared with patients solely treated at the presenting hospital has not been evaluated. Here, we assess the long-term mortality of patients who undergo interhospital transfer during their acute myocardial infarction admission. METHODS: We evaluated 40 482 patients with a ICD10-AM diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals in New South Wales, Australia, from 2004 to 2008, of whom 10 107 (25%) were transferred. We compared in-hospital and mortality up to 5.5 years postdischarge among transferred and non-transferred patients. We created a 1:1 propensity score matched cohort (n=16 854; 8427 per group) to account for selection bias. RESULTS: In the matched cohort, transferred patients were more likely to undergo revascularisation (55.6% vs 13.7%, RR 4.05; 95% CI 3.83 to 4.29) and had lower mortality at 30 days (3.5% vs 5.7%, HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.70), 1 year (7.5% vs 12.6%, HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.52 to 0.64) and at the end of follow-up (15.3% vs 22.5%, HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.70) than patients treated in presenting hospitals. With the exception of transfers originating from revascularisation capable hospitals, these findings were consistent across a range of subgroups, including patients of all ages, ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non ST-elevation myocardial infarctionpatients, and transfers originating from hospitals in regional and major city areas. Sensitivity analyses showed that these findings are unlikely to be due to survival bias or to confounding by unmeasured variables. CONCLUSIONS:Patients hospitalised for an acute myocardial infarction who are transferred to one or more hospitals for specialised care have higher rates of coronary revascularisation and experience lower long-term mortality. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Authors: Ian J Barbash; Hongwei Zhang; Derek C Angus; Steven E Reis; Chung-Chou H Chang; Francis R Pike; Jeremy M Kahn Journal: Med Care Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Sandra C Thompson; Lee Nedkoff; Judith Katzenellenbogen; Mohammad Akhtar Hussain; Frank Sanfilippo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: J Afonso Rocha; José Carlos Cardoso; Alberto Freitas; Thomas G Allison; Luís F Azevedo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-07-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Derrick Lopez; Lee Nedkoff; Matthew Knuiman; Michael S T Hobbs; Thomas G Briffa; David B Preen; Joseph Hung; John Beilby; Sushma Mathur; Anna Reynolds; Frank M Sanfilippo Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-11-17 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Isuru Ranasinghe; Sadia Hossain; Anna Ali; Dennis Horton; Robert Jt Adams; Bernadette Aliprandi-Costa; Christina Bertilone; Gustavo Carneiro; Martin Gallagher; Steven Guthridge; Billingsley Kaambwa; Sradha Kotwal; Gerry O'Callaghan; Ian A Scott; Renuka Visvanathan; Richard J Woodman Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-08-20 Impact factor: 2.692