Elisabeth A Donaldson1, Joanna E Cohen2, Andrea C Villanti3, Norma F Kanarek4, Colleen L Barry5, Lainie Rutkow5. 1. Department of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: edonalds@jhsph.edu. 2. Department of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore, MD, United States; Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Baltimore, MD, United States. 3. Department of Health, Behavior & Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Baltimore, MD, United States; Schroeder Institute for Tobacco Research and Policy Studies, Washington, DC, United States. 4. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States. 5. Department of Health, Policy, & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study examined bill- and state-level factors associated with enactment of adult obesity prevention legislation in US states. METHODS: A review of bills in the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity's legislative database identified 487 adult obesity prevention bills, or proposed legislation, introduced between 2010 and 2013. Multilevel models were constructed to examine bill- and state-level characteristics associated with enactment. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2013, 81 (17%) of obesity prevention bills introduced were enacted across 35 states and the District of Columbia. Bills introduced in 2010 were more likely to be enacted than in 2013 (OR=9.49; 95% CI: 2.61-34.5). Bills focused on access to healthy food, physical activity, general and educational programs, as well as modifying rules and procedures (e.g., preemption) had greater odds of enactment relative to food and beverage taxes (OR=8.18; 95% CI: 2.85-23.4 healthy food; OR=17.3; 95% CI: 4.55-65.7 physical activity; OR=15.2; 95% CI: 4.80-47.9 general; OR=13.7; 95% CI: 3.07-61.5 rules). CONCLUSION: The year of bill introduction and overall bill enactment rate were related to adult obesity prevention legislation enactment in states. This study highlights the importance of a bill's topic area for enactment and provides insights for advocates and policymakers trying to address enactment barriers.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined bill- and state-level factors associated with enactment of adult obesity prevention legislation in US states. METHODS: A review of bills in the Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity's legislative database identified 487 adult obesity prevention bills, or proposed legislation, introduced between 2010 and 2013. Multilevel models were constructed to examine bill- and state-level characteristics associated with enactment. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2013, 81 (17%) of obesity prevention bills introduced were enacted across 35 states and the District of Columbia. Bills introduced in 2010 were more likely to be enacted than in 2013 (OR=9.49; 95% CI: 2.61-34.5). Bills focused on access to healthy food, physical activity, general and educational programs, as well as modifying rules and procedures (e.g., preemption) had greater odds of enactment relative to food and beverage taxes (OR=8.18; 95% CI: 2.85-23.4 healthy food; OR=17.3; 95% CI: 4.55-65.7 physical activity; OR=15.2; 95% CI: 4.80-47.9 general; OR=13.7; 95% CI: 3.07-61.5 rules). CONCLUSION: The year of bill introduction and overall bill enactment rate were related to adult obesity prevention legislation enactment in states. This study highlights the importance of a bill's topic area for enactment and provides insights for advocates and policymakers trying to address enactment barriers.
Authors: S Kremers; A Reubsaet; M Martens; S Gerards; R Jonkers; M Candel; I de Weerdt; N de Vries Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2009-06-16 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Tegan K Boehmer; Douglas A Luke; Debra L Haire-Joshu; Hannalori S Bates; Ross C Brownson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Sara N Bleich; Jesse Jones-Smith; Hannah Jones; Marguerite O'Hara; Lainie Rutkow Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Christine L Gray; Lynne C Messer; Kristen M Rappazzo; Jyotsna S Jagai; Shannon C Grabich; Danelle T Lobdell Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 3.240