Literature DB >> 25735437

A mechanical chest compressor closed-loop controller with an effective trade-off between blood flow improvement and ribs fracture reduction.

Guang Zhang1, Taihu Wu, Zhenxing Song, Haitao Wang, Hengzhi Lu, Yalin Wang, Dan Wang, Feng Chen.   

Abstract

Chest compression (CC) is a significant emergency medical procedure for maintaining circulation during cardiac arrest. Although CC produces the necessary blood flow for patients with heart arrest, improperly deep CC will contribute significantly to the risk of chest injury. In this paper, an optimal CC closed-loop controller for a mechanical chest compressor (OCC-MCC) was developed to provide an effective trade-off between the benefit of improved blood perfusion and the risk of ribs fracture. The trade-off performance of the OCC-MCC during real automatic mechanical CCs was evaluated by comparing the OCC-MCC and the traditional mechanical CC method (TMCM) with a human circulation hardware model based on hardware simulations. A benefit factor (BF), risk factor (RF) and benefit versus risk index (BRI) were introduced in this paper for the comprehensive evaluation of risk and benefit. The OCC-MCC was developed using the LabVIEW control platform and the mechanical chest compressor (MCC) controller. PID control is also employed by MCC for effective compression depth regulation. In addition, the physiological parameters model for MCC was built based on a digital signal processor for hardware simulations. A comparison between the OCC-MCC and TMCM was then performed based on the simulation test platform which is composed of the MCC, LabVIEW control platform, physiological parameters model for MCC and the manikin. Compared with the TMCM, the OCC-MCC obtained a better trade-off and a higher BRI in seven out of a total of nine cases. With a higher mean value of cardiac output (1.35 L/min) and partial pressure of end-tidal CO2 (15.7 mmHg), the OCC-MCC obtained a larger blood flow and higher BF than TMCM (5.19 vs. 3.41) in six out of a total of nine cases. Although it is relatively difficult to maintain a stable CC depth when the chest is stiff, the OCC-MCC is still superior to the TMCM for performing safe and effective CC during CPR. The OCC-MCC is superior to the TMCM in performing safe and effective CC during CPR and can be incorporated into the current version of mechanical CC devices for high quality CPR, in both in-hospital and out-of-hospital CPR settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25735437     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-015-1258-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  27 in total

Review 1.  Part 8: adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Robert W Neumar; Charles W Otto; Mark S Link; Steven L Kronick; Michael Shuster; Clifton W Callaway; Peter J Kudenchuk; Joseph P Ornato; Bryan McNally; Scott M Silvers; Rod S Passman; Roger D White; Erik P Hess; Wanchun Tang; Daniel Davis; Elizabeth Sinz; Laurie J Morrison
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Expired PCO2 as a prognostic indicator of successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest.

Authors:  A B Sanders; G A Ewy; S Bragg; M Atlas; K B Kern
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Effects of compression depth and pre-shock pauses predict defibrillation failure during cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Dana P Edelson; Benjamin S Abella; Jo Kramer-Johansen; Lars Wik; Helge Myklebust; Anne M Barry; Raina M Merchant; Terry L Vanden Hoek; Petter A Steen; Lance B Becker
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Coronary perfusion pressure and the return of spontaneous circulation in human cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  N A Paradis; G B Martin; E P Rivers; M G Goetting; T J Appleton; M Feingold; R M Nowak
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Cardiac output during cardiopulmonary resuscitation at various compression rates and durations.

Authors:  K R Fitzgerald; C F Babbs; H A Frissora; R W Davis; D I Silver
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1981-09

6.  Chest compressions by ambulance personnel on chests with variable stiffness: abilities and attitudes.

Authors:  Silje Ødegaard; Jo Kramer-Johansen; Allan Bromley; Helge Myklebust; Jon Nysaether; Lars Wik; Petter Andreas Steen
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  End-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A prognostic indicator for survival.

Authors:  A B Sanders; K B Kern; C W Otto; M M Milander; G A Ewy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-09-08       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Correlation of end-tidal CO2 to cerebral perfusion during CPR.

Authors:  L M Lewis; J Stothert; J Standeven; B Chandel; M Kurtz; J Fortney
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  A new paradigm for human resuscitation research using intelligent devices.

Authors:  Charles F Babbs; Andre E Kemeny; Weilun Quan; Gary Freeman
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Visualization of cardiac valve motion in man during external chest compression using two-dimensional echocardiography. Implications regarding the mechanism of blood flow.

Authors:  J A Werner; H L Greene; C L Janko; L A Cobb
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-06       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.