Literature DB >> 25734860

Glycemic Variability Is Associated with Frequency of Blood Glucose Testing and Bolus: Post Hoc Analysis Results from the ProAct Study.

Andreas Pfützner1, Jörg Weissmann, Stavroula Mougiakakou, Elena Daskalaki, Norbert Weis, Ralph Ziegler.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The ProAct study has shown that a pump switch to the Accu-Chek(®) Combo system (Roche Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) in type 1 diabetes patients results in stable glycemic control with significant improvements in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in patients with unsatisfactory baseline HbA1c and shorter pump usage time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of the ProAct database, we investigated the glycemic control and glycemic variability at baseline by determination of several established parameters and scores (HbA1c, hypoglycemia frequency, J-score, Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia Indexes, and Index of Glycemic Control) in participants with different daily bolus and blood glucose measurement frequencies (less than four day, four or five per day, and more than five per day, in both cases). The data were derived from up to 299 patients (172 females, 127 males; age [mean±SD], 39.4±15.2 years; pump treatment duration, 7.0±5.2 years).
RESULTS: Participants with frequent glucose readings had better glycemic control than those with few readings (more than five readings per day vs. less than four readings per day: HbA1c, 7.2±1.1% vs. 8.0±0.9%; mean daily blood glucose, 151±22 mg/dL vs. 176±30 mg/dL; percentage of readings per month >300 mg/dL, 10±4% vs. 14±5%; percentage of readings in target range [80-180 mg/dL], 59% vs. 48% [P<0.05 in all cases]) and had a lower glycemic variability (J-score, 49±13 vs. 71±25 [P<0.05]; Hyperglycemia Index, 0.9±0.5 vs. 1.9±1.2 [P<0.05]; Index of Glycemic Control, 1.9±0.8 vs. 3.1±1.6 [P<0.05]; Hypoglycemia Index, 0.9±0.8 vs. 1.2±1.3 [not significant]). Frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose was associated with a higher number of bolus applications (6.1±2.2 boluses/day vs. 4.5±2.0 boluses/day [P<0.05]). Therefore, a similar but less pronounced effect on glycemic variability in favor of more daily bolus applications was observed (more than five vs. less than four bolues per day: J-score, 57±17 vs. 63±25 [not significant]; Hypoglycemia Index, 1.0±1.0 vs. 1.5±1.4 [P<0.05]; Hyperglycemia Index, 1.3±0.6 vs. 1.6±1.1 [not significant]; Index of Glycemic Control, 2.3±1.1 vs. 3.1±1.7 [P<0.05]).
CONCLUSIONS: Pump users who perform frequent daily glucose readings have a better glycemic control with lower glycemic variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25734860      PMCID: PMC4432784          DOI: 10.1089/dia.2014.0278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  18 in total

Review 1.  Insulin-pump therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  John C Pickup
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Frequency of SMBG correlates with HbA1c and acute complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Ralph Ziegler; Bettina Heidtmann; Doerte Hilgard; Sabine Hofer; Joachim Rosenbauer; Reinhard Holl
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.866

3.  Comparison of the effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and NPH-based multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) on glycaemic control and quality of life: results of the 5-nations trial.

Authors:  R P L M Hoogma; P J Hammond; R Gomis; D Kerr; D Bruttomesso; K P Bouter; K J Wiefels; H de la Calle; D H Schweitzer; M Pfohl; E Torlone; L G Krinelke; G B Bolli
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 4.  Interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring data: glycemic variability and quality of glycemic control.

Authors:  David Rodbard
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  New and improved methods to characterize glycemic variability using continuous glucose monitoring.

Authors:  David Rodbard
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  Evaluation of a new measure of blood glucose variability in diabetes.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; Erik Otto; Daniel Cox; Linda Gonder-Frederick; William Clarke
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Quantifying temporal glucose variability in diabetes via continuous glucose monitoring: mathematical methods and clinical application.

Authors:  Boris P Kovatchev; William L Clarke; Marc Breton; Kenneth Brayman; Anthony McCall
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 8.  A review of the security of insulin pump infusion systems.

Authors:  Nathanael Paul; Tadayoshi Kohno; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

9.  A method for assessing quality of control from glucose profiles.

Authors:  N R Hill; P C Hindmarsh; R J Stevens; I M Stratton; J C Levy; D R Matthews
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 4.359

Review 10.  Severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of multiple daily insulin injections compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.

Authors:  J C Pickup; A J Sutton
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.359

View more
  5 in total

1.  CGM Versus FGM; or, Continuous Glucose Monitoring Is Not Flash Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Lutz Heinemann; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-09-01

2.  Behavioral Patterns and Associations with Glucose Control During 12-Week Randomized Free-Living Clinical Trial of Day and Night Hybrid Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Ali Emami; Malgorzata E Willinska; Hood Thabit; Lalantha Leelarathna; Sara Hartnell; Sibylle Dellweg; Carsten Benesch; Julia K Mader; Manuel Holzer; Harald Kojzar; Thomas R Pieber; Sabine Arnolds; Mark L Evans; Roman Hovorka
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.118

3.  Factors associated with high levels of glycated haemoglobin in patients with type 1 diabetes: a multicentre study in Brazil.

Authors:  Carine Sousa Andrade; Guilherme Sousa Ribeiro; Carlos Antonio Souza Teles Santos; Raimundo Celestino Silva Neves; Edson Duarte Moreira
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Increased Time in Range and Fewer Missed Bolus Injections After Introduction of a Smart Connected Insulin Pen.

Authors:  Peter Adolfsson; Niels Væver Hartvig; Anne Kaas; Jonas Bech Møller; Jarl Hellman
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Glucose Regulation Beyond HbA1c in Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Insulin: Real-World Evidence From the DIALECT-2 Cohort.

Authors:  Niala den Braber; Miriam M R Vollenbroek-Hutten; Kathryn M Westerik; Stephan J L Bakker; Gerjan Navis; Bert-Jan F van Beijnum; Gozewijn D Laverman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 19.112

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.