Literature DB >> 25734682

[Survey on information needs of cancer patients and their relatives in Germany].

Ivonne Rudolph1, Eckart Seilacher1, Marie-Jolin Köster1, Jan Stellamanns1, Patrick Liebl1, Jörg Zell2, Svenja Ludwig3, Volker Beck4, Jutta Hübner5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cancer patients generally have a great need for disease-related information. They prefer to be informed personally by the attending doctor. Yet, they also use other sources, mostly from medical laypersons or public media. The goal of our survey was to obtain insight into information patients get and their requirements regarding information. METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS: Using a standardized questionnaire, we conducted a survey on 226 patients and 32 relatives, who attended meetings providing information for cancer patients.
RESULTS: Patients were generally content or highly content with the information they got. The direct consultation with the doctor is the most important source of information especially for older patients. Information by other patients and self-help groups rank second, followed by internet and online chats, which both are of minor importance for patients older than 60 years. From the patients' point of view, sources of information should be individualized and comprehensive, provided by experts and allowing for questions. Patients prefer one constant person for communication. Remarkably, empathic communication was not rated as important. Age and gender are not associated with these preferences for these characteristics of sources of information. DISCUSSION: Patients' and relatives' desire for an individualized, comprehensive counseling with high expertise provided by one person points to the limits of resources of the health system. The importance of additional information material will rise accordingly. This material should be tailored to the needs of diverse patient groups. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25734682     DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-100585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0012-0472            Impact factor:   0.628


  6 in total

Review 1.  Is there evidence for a better health care for cancer patients after a second opinion? A systematic review.

Authors:  Dana Ruetters; Christian Keinki; Sarah Schroth; Patrick Liebl; Jutta Huebner
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Information Needs of Cancer Patients and Perception of Impact of the Disease, of Self-Efficacy, and Locus of Control.

Authors:  C Keinki; E Seilacher; M Ebel; D Ruetters; I Kessler; J Stellamanns; I Rudolph; J Huebner
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Nutritional care of cancer patients: a survey on patients' needs and medical care in reality.

Authors:  J Maschke; U Kruk; K Kastrati; J Kleeberg; D Buchholz; N Erickson; J Huebner
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Development of a Rating Tool for Mobile Cancer Apps: Information Analysis and Formal and Content-Related Evaluation of Selected Cancer Apps.

Authors:  Cathleen Böhme; Marc Baron von Osthoff; Katrin Frey; Jutta Hübner
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Cancer Patients and the Internet: a Survey Among German Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Marie-Desiree Ebel; Jan Stellamanns; Christian Keinki; Ivonne Rudolph; Jutta Huebner
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  eHealth Literacy in German Skin Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Henner Stege; Sara Schneider; Andrea Forschner; Thomas Eigentler; Dorothée Nashan; Svea Huening; Frank Meiss; Saskia Lehr; Martin Kaatz; Robert Kuchen; Katharina C Kaehler; Maximilian Haist; Jutta Huebner; Carmen Loquai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.614

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.