| Literature DB >> 25734018 |
Yu-Chen Chen1, Jian Zhang2, Xiao-Wei Li3, Wenqing Xia4, Xu Feng5, Cheng Qian2, Xiang-Yu Yang2, Chun-Qiang Lu2, Jian Wang6, Richard Salvi7, Gao-Jun Teng2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Subjective tinnitus is hypothesized to arise from aberrant neural activity; however, its neural bases are poorly understood. To identify aberrant neural networks involved in chronic tinnitus, we compared the resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) patterns of tinnitus patients and healthy controls.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25734018 PMCID: PMC4334979 DOI: 10.1155/2015/475382
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Characteristics of the participants.
| Tinnitus patients | Healthy controls |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Age (year) | 40.9 ± 10.5 | 46.2 ± 11.9 | 0.074 |
| Sex (male : female) | 16 : 13 | 15 : 15 | 0.691 |
| Education (years) | 10.9 ± 2.2 | 11.1 ± 1.7 | 0.665 |
| Tinnitus duration (months) | 39.5 ± 33.7 | — | — |
| THQ score | 103.5 ± 74.4 | — | — |
Data are expressed as Mean ± SD. THQ: Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaires.
Comparisons of the brain volumes between the tinnitus patients and healthy controls.
| Tinnitus patients | Healthy controls |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Gray matter | 581.2 ± 26.4 | 576.1 ± 22.1 | 0.423 |
| White matter | 531.6 ± 25.6 | 528.8 ± 25.4 | 0.680 |
| Brain parenchyma | 1112.8 ± 33.5 | 1105.0 ± 37.7 | 0.401 |
Data are expressed as Mean ± SD.
Figure 1(a) Regions of significant ReHo differences in tinnitus patients compared with healthy controls. Heat map (upper, right) shows areas of increased ReHo (t values 2.62 to 3.40; red to yellow, resp.) and decreased ReHo (t values −2.60 to −3.20; dark blue to light blue, resp.). Table 3 identified regions where significant increases and decreases occurred. (b) Significant increased functional connectivity of four seed regions between tinnitus patients and healthy subjects. Table 4 identified regions where significant increases occurred. The threshold was set at P < 0.01 (AlphaSim correction). L: left; R: right; ReHo: regional homogeneity; AI: anterior insula; IFG: inferior frontal gyrus; SMG: supramarginal gyrus.
Differences in ReHo between tinnitus patients and healthy controls.
| Brain region | BA | MNI coordinates |
| Voxels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| L anterior insular cortex | 13 | −36, 24, 9 | 3.1674 | 48 |
| R anterior insular cortex | 13 | 33, 21, 9 | 3.2775 | 32 |
| L inferior frontal gyrus | 47 | −57, 39, 6 | 3.2861 | 39 |
| R supramarginal gyrus | 40 | 33, −39, 42 | 3.5553 | 27 |
| L cuneus | 18 | −3, −96, 0 | −3.3198 | 446 |
The threshold was set at P < 0.01 (AlphaSim correction). BA: Brodmann's area; MNI: Montreal Neurological Institute; L: left; R: right.
Figure 2Relationships between abnormal functional connectivity and tinnitus distress. ((a)-(b)) The functional connectivity of left AI to left MFG was correlated with the THQ score (r = 0.459, P = 0.012). (c) The aberrant brain connectivity networks from four seed regions. The red represents the left AI; the magenta represents the right AI; the yellow represents the left IFG; the green represents the right SMG. ((d)-(e)) The functional connectivity of right AI to right MFG was correlated with the THQ score (r = 0.479, P = 0.009). L: left; R: right; THQ: Tinnitus Handicap Questionnaires; AI: anterior insula; IFG: inferior frontal gyrus; SMG: supramarginal gyrus; MFG: middle frontal gyrus; STG: superior temporal gyrus; ITG: inferior temporal gyrus; ACC: anterior cingulate cortex; PCC: posterior cingulate cortex; OFC: orbitofrontal cortex.
Abnormal functional connectivity of four seed regions in tinnitus patients compared with healthy controls.
| Seed region | Brain region | BA | MNI coordinates |
| Voxels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| L anterior insular cortex | L middle frontal gyrus | 10 | −39, 54, 0 | 3.4091 | 31 |
| R inferior temporal gyrus | 20 | 60, −42, −18 | 3.4815 | 27 | |
| R precuneus | 7 | 21, −66, 39 | 4.1773 | 28 | |
|
| |||||
| R anterior insular cortex | R middle frontal gyrus | 11 | 12, 54, −6 | 4.6623 | 99 |
| R superior temporal gyrus | 22 | 69, −21, 0 | 3.9777 | 26 | |
| L precuneus | 19 | −30, −78, 33 | 2.9759 | 23 | |
| L posterior cingulate cortex | 29 | −3, −51, 9 | 3.4933 | 40 | |
|
| |||||
| L inferior frontal gyrus | R middle frontal gyrus | 11 | 30, 42, −12 | 4.1975 | 100 |
| R inferior temporal gyrus | 37 | 63, −54, −12 | 3.9566 | 131 | |
| R anterior cingulated cortex | 32 | 15, 30, 21 | 4.2129 | 27 | |
|
| |||||
| R supramarginal gyrus | L inferior frontal gyrus | 46 | −45, 27, 21 | 3.6893 | 27 |
| R orbitofrontal cortex | 47 | 48, 48, −15 | 4.0962 | 20 | |
The threshold was set at P < 0.01 (AlphaSim correction). BA: Brodmann's area; MNI: Montreal Neurological Institute; L: left; R: right.