| Literature DB >> 25734008 |
Jiali Sun1,2, Leslie E Huye1, Natalia Lapteva1,2, Maksim Mamonkin1, Manasa Hiregange1, Brandon Ballard1, Olga Dakhova1, Darshana Raghavan1, April G Durett1, Serena K Perna1, Bilal Omer1, Lisa A Rollins1, Ann M Leen1,2,3, Juan F Vera1,4, Gianpietro Dotti1,4, Adrian P Gee1,3, Malcolm K Brenner1,3,4, Douglas G Myers5, Cliona M Rooney1,2,3,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Virus-specific T-cells (VSTs) proliferate exponentially after adoptive transfer into hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, eliminate virus infections, then persist and provide long-term protection from viral disease. If VSTs behaved similarly when modified with tumor-specific chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), they should have potent anti-tumor activity. This theory was evaluated by Cruz et al. in a previous clinical trial with CD19.CAR-modified VSTs, but there was little apparent expansion of these cells in patients. In that study, VSTs were gene-modified on day 19 of culture and we hypothesized that by this time, sufficient T-cell differentiation may have occurred to limit the subsequent proliferative capacity of the transduced T-cells. To facilitate the clinical testing of this hypothesis in a project supported by the NHLBI-PACT mechanism, we developed and optimized a good manufacturing practices (GMP) compliant method for the early transduction of VSTs directed to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Adenovirus (AdV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) using a CAR directed to the tumor-associated antigen disialoganglioside (GD2).Entities:
Keywords: Chimeric antigen receptor; Clinical grade T-cell manufacture; Virus-specific T cells
Year: 2015 PMID: 25734008 PMCID: PMC4346112 DOI: 10.1186/s40425-015-0049-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunother Cancer ISSN: 2051-1426 Impact factor: 13.751
Figure 1Optimization of early transduction of EBVSTs with a retroviral vector encoding GFP. PBMCs were stimulated with autologous EBV-LCLs with or without IL-4 and IL-7. Two days later, the cells were transduced with a high titer retroviral vector encoding GFP. The transgene (GFP) expression by EBVSTs transduced (A) on day 2 (ET) or (B) on day 19 (LT) was determined by FACS analysis after the number of stimulations indicated. (C) Show the total cell numbers of Day 2 (ET) transduced cells in the presence or absence of IL-4 and IL-7 over time. Data represent the mean +/− sd of 2 donors.
Figure 2Early transduction of EBVSTs with GD2.CAR vector. PBMCs were stimulated four times with irradiated autologous LCLs on days 0, 9, 16 and 23 of culture. They were transduced with the GD2.CAR retroviral vector either on day 3 or day 19. GD2.CAR transgene levels were measured by flow cytometry on (A) day 3- early transduced (ET) or (B) day 19 late-transduced (LT) EBVSTs at the end of each stimulation. Data represent the mean +/− sd of 2 donors. (C) The transduction efficiency of ET or LT cells was compared with patient-derived EBVSTs (transduced on day ~19) from the previous clinical trial [1] using real-time PCR analysis for the retroviral vector. Day 19-transduced (LT) EBVSTs and patient lines demonstrated similar transduction efficiencies while Day 3-transduced (ET) EBVSTs attained a much higher transgene expression. Transgene PCR was performed 5 to 8 days post-transduction. (D) Specific killing was determined in a 6-hour 51Chromium-release assay using the GD2 expressing neuroblastoma cell line, LAN-1 (top), and autologous LCL (bottom).
Figure 3The effector memory phenotype of T - cells transduced on day 3 and day 19. The phenotype of Day 3 (early) and Day 19 (late)-transduced VSTs was determined by flow cytometry after staining for CD3, CD45RO, CD62L, CCR7, CD8 and the GD2.CAR. (A) Gating of T cell memory subsets. CD3+GD2.CAR+ CD45RO+ cells were gated and their memory phenotype classified based on differential expression of CD62L and CCR7. Representative dot-plots from one donor out of six are shown (B). Percentages of CD62L+CCR7+ central memory cells, CD62L+CCR7− intermediate, CD62L−CCR7− effector memory T cells were gated as above in six donors. (C) The frequency of CD4+ and CD8+ cells in the CD3+GD2.CAR+ gate. The analysis of the phenotype was performed at the time of potential cryopreservation (day 11 for Day 3 transduced VSTs and day 26 for Day 19 transduced VSTs).
Figure 4Simultaneous induction of trivirus - specific T - cells. (A) A diagram depicting the standard protocol for the generation of triVSTs. (B) Comparison of two protocols for the simultaneous induction of triVSTs. In Ad/PBMC + LCL protocol, PBMCs were cultured in non-tissue culture treated plates overnight then transduced with Ad5f35-pp65 and cocultured with autologous LCLs. In the Ad/LCL protocol, LCLs were transduced with the Ad5f35-pp65 vector and used for autologous PBMC stimulation. (C) Day 9 after the first stimulation, the AdV (hexon and penton), CMV (pp65) and EBV (Auto LCL) specificities were determined by ELIspot assay using pepmixes for hexon, penton and pp65 and autologous LCLs for EBV. The MOI of Ad5f35-pp65 transduction and the ratio of PBMC to LCL are indicated. (D) TriVSTs were generated using Ad/LCLs and Ad/PBMC + LCLs (100:1) and counted on days 3, 10, and 14. Data represent the mean +/− sd of 2 donors.
Figure 5Optimization of the induction of trivirus specificity with Ad5f35 - pp65 transduced LCL. (A) Trivirus specificity was determined by γ-IFN ELIspot assay 9 days after the 1st stimulation. The MOIs of Ad5f35-pp65 transduction of LCLs were 103, 104, and 105 vp per cell respectively. (B) LCLs were transduced with an MOI of 104 and cultured for the indicated times before being irradiated and used for PBMC stimulation. ELIspot assays were performed 9 days after the 1st stimulation. Non-transduced (NT) LCLs were used as controls. Data represent the mean +/− sd of 2 donors. (C) Tri-virus specific CTLs were initiated on Day 0 and re-stimulated on Days 9 and 18. Tri-virus specificities were assessed by γ-IFN ELIspot assay with LCLs or overlapping libraries of pepmixes spanning adenovirus hexon and penton and CMV pp65 proteins.
Figure 6Improving the efficiency of the TriVST transduction. (A) PBMCs were stimulated using the Ad/LCL protocol in the presence of IL-4 and IL-7 and transduced on day 3 with the GD2.CAR vector. Co-expression of the GD2.CAR on pentamer positive CMV (A2-NLV), EBV (A2-CLG) and AdV (A24-TYF)-specific T-cells was analyzed by flow cytometry after the 3rd stimulation to confirm the transduction of triVSTs. The dot plots of one representative donor are shown. (B) GD2.CAR-transduced and non-transduced triVSTs from three donors were analyzed in IFN-γ ELISPOT with serial dilutions of overlapping pepmix library spanning adenovirus hexon. Responses were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and no statistical significant difference (p > 0.5) between transduced and non-transduced cells were found (C) The transduction efficiency with or without centrifugation of the retrovirus vector at 2000 × G onto the retronectin-coated plates is shown. (D) The transduction efficiency of VSTs after the indicated centrifugation time for the retroviral supernatant. Data represent the mean +/− sd of 2 donors. (E) Surface expression levels of GD2.CAR were upregulated in early transduced (ET) CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (left panel) and in late transduced (LT, right panel) triVSTs upon stimulation with LCLs and LCLs transduced with Ad5f35-pp65 (LCL Adpp65) for 48 hours without cytokines. Results are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3.
Figure 7Cytokines predominantly produced by early differentiated triVSTs. One million early (ET) or late (LT) transduced triVSTs from two donors were stimulated with the pp65 pepmix or 2.5×105 autologous LCLs transduced with Ad5f35-pp65. Supernatants were collected 24 hours after the stimulation and analyzed for multiple cytokines using multiplex cytokine magnetic bead assay.
Figure 8Improved proliferation of early transduced triVSTs. Early transduced (ET) and late transduced (LT) triVST with retrovirus expressing GD2.CAR were co-cultured for 72 hours with (A) GD2-positive LAN-1 neuroblastoma cells, or with (B) autologous LCLs at 4:1 of VST to LCL ratio or (C) Ad5f35-pp65-transduced LCLs (LCL-Adpp65). Proliferation of CD3+ T cells was evaluated by eFluor dilution by flow cytometry. Histograms are representative results from one donor. Cell division indexes were calculated using FlowJo software. Results are shown as mean ± SD, n = 3.
Figure 9GMP validation of the SOP for early transduction of TriVSTs. (A) Diagram of the finalized SOP. Day 0, PBMC were stimulated with irradiated, Ad5f35-transduced autologous LCLs and then transduced on day 3. On day 9, triVSTs were harvested and restimulated in a G-Rex100 gas permeable flask. Cryopreservation was performed after the second stimulation on days 16–18 of culture. (B) Transgene expression after the 1st and 2nd stimulation was determined by flow cytometry in 4 donors. (C) Trivirus specificity was determined by γ-IFN ELIspot assay after the 1st and 2nd stimulations. 1x105 responder cells per well were pulsed with overlapping peptide libraries for hexon, penton (to test for adenovirus specificity) and pp65 (to test for CMV specificity) and LCLs (to test for EBV specificity). One representative donor of three is shown. (D) Three clinical products of CAR-transduced triVSTs were cryopreserved in 10% DMSO, 12.5% HSA (Flexbumin, Baxter) and 1xHBSS in a Cryomed controlled-rate freezer. Viability of fresh and thawed cells was evaluated using trypan blue exclusion method. (E) INF-γ ELISPOT assay results for fresh and thawed CAR-transduced tri-VSTs. Adenovirus-specific responses were evaluated using pepmix libraries spanning hexon and penton, CMV with a pepmix library for pp65 and EBV-specific responses were analyzed using autologous LCLs.