Literature DB >> 25733938

Necrotizing fasciitis: risk factors of mortality.

Patcharin Khamnuan1, Wilaiwan Chongruksut2, Kijja Jearwattanakanok3, Jayanton Patumanond4, Suttida Yodluangfun5, Apichat Tantraworasin2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a serious infection of skin and soft tissues that rapidly progresses along the deep fascia. It becomes a fatal soft tissue infection with high mortality rate if treatment is delayed. Early diagnosis for emergency surgical debridement and broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy were the optimal treatments to reduce the mortality rate of NF.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors that increased the mortality rate in patients with NF under routine clinical practices.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at three general hospitals located in northern Thailand. All medical records of patients with surgically confirmed NF treated between January 2009 and December 2012 were reviewed. Clinical predictors for mortality were analyzed using multivariable risk regression analysis.
RESULTS: Of a total of 1,504 patients with a diagnosis of NF, 19.3% (n=290) died in hospital and 80.7% (n=1,214) survived. From multivariable analysis, being female (risk ratio [RR] =1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.01-1.84); age >60 (RR=1.39, 95% CI =1.25-1.53); having chronic heart disease (RR=1.64, 95% CI=1.18-2.28), cirrhosis (RR =2.36, 95% CI=1.70-3.27), skin necrosis (RR =1.22, 95% CI=1.15-1.28), pulse rate >130/min (RR =2.26, 95% CI=1.79-2.85), systolic BP <90 mmHg (RR =2.05, 95% CI =1.44-2.91), and serum creatinine ≥1.6 mg/dL (RR=3.06, 95% CI=2.08-4.50) were risk factors for mortality.
CONCLUSION: Prognostic factors for mortality in NF patients included being female; age >60; or having chronic heart disease, cirrhosis, skin necrosis, pulse rate >130/min, systolic BP <90 mmHg, and serum creatinine ≥1.6 mg/dL. Thus, disease progression to mortality may occur in such patients presenting one of these risk factors. Further examination or close monitoring for systemic involvement may be advantageous to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical predictors; mortality; necrotizing fasciitis; risk factor

Year:  2015        PMID: 25733938      PMCID: PMC4337692          DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S77691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1179-1594


Introduction

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is commonly known as flesh-eating disease. The infection involves necrosis of the subcutaneous tissue and fascia first described by Wilson in the 1950s.1 NF is a disease characterized by a rapidly progressing destruction of tissue and systemic toxicity, and delayed treatment can lead to an infection with a high mortality rate.2 The incidence of NF has been varyingly reported worldwide, 0.4 cases per 100,000 population in Canada3 and 1.3 cases per 100,000 population in Florida, USA.4 The mortality rates reported of 15% to 36% in Ohio, USA (1989–1994);5 Taiwan (1995–2006);6 Chicago, USA (1999–2002);7 and the Philippines (2004–2007).8 In northern Thailand, Hongladaromp et al9 reported the incidence of NF was 7.45 cases per 100,000 population, and the mortality rate ranged from 5.9% to 22.1%.9,10 Emergency surgical debridement and broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy remain the most appropriate treatments to reduce the mortality rate of NF. Delayed recognition and treatment can cause the disease to progress and increases the risk of poor outcomes, so it is very important to diagnose the disease at an early stage and treat rapidly. Previous studies have reported independent risk factors for mortality among NF patients including being female,11 having advanced age,6,7,11–13 diabetes mellitus (DM),4 heart disease,14,15 liver cirrhosis,6,12,15 serum creatinine level 2 mg/dL,6,11,12,14 white blood cell count >30,000/mm3,14 hypoalbuminemia,8 presence of hemorrhagic bleb,16,17 and skin necrosis.17 All studies presented varying prevailing epidemiology and microbiology in each place. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for mortality in a large group of patients with NF from three general hospitals in northern Thailand undergoing routine clinical practices. From clinical findings the identified risk factors can then be used as predictors in order to assist surgeons into taking preventative measures at an early stage of NF. However, some clinical data were unavailable for this study such as anaerobic bacteria culture and some laboratory findings that might be possible risk factors to predict mortality.

Patients and methods

This study was a retrospective cohort study. The medical records of patients with surgically confirmed NF were registered between January 2009 and December 2012 at three general hospitals located in northern Thailand (Chiang Rai, KamphaengPhet, and Phayao Provinces). NF was defined by the presence of extensive necrosis involving at least the fascia and subcutaneous tissue, including myonecrosis.18 The gray necrotic fascia and myonecrosis were detected intraoperatively by surgeons and used to identically follow Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Skin and Soft Tissue Infections by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.19 The definition of mortality was death at admission or 28 days after surgical treatment. Clinical data and demographic characteristics including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), education, occupation, underlying disease, vital signs within the first day of admission and after 48–72 hours were retrieved from inpatient charts. Important data associated with the investigation and treatment of NF (wound appearance, site of infection, organisms involved, and laboratory data within the first day of admission and after 48–72 hours, surgical intervention, and outcome) were also extracted from the medical records. In total 1,504 patients were enrolled in this study. All cases were assessed and treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics by emergency physicians. Patients were investigated, evaluated, and provided proper emergency surgical treatment. The surgical interventions included incision, drainage, debridement of the necrotic fascia or muscle, and amputation. All debris tissue was dissected, and in some of the cases tissue culture was performed. Anaerobic organism cultures were not performed because of the limitation of the culture process. Aerobic organism cultures were performed in some of the cases, but not all, depending on surgeon request. Although we have a standard practice guideline for taking tissue cultures or pus cultures in all infected specimens, some surgeons did not follow this guideline. The reasons were shortage of culture instruments or culture transferring process (loss of specimen). Furthermore, the data recording process in each provincial hospital was not good enough. Some of the important data such as tissue culture, blood culture, or pus culture might be lost. Patients were divided into two groups: mortality and survival. Continuous variables were analyzed by Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test and assessed as mean or median with standard deviation or interquartile range, depending on the distribution of data. Differences in proportion were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test and assessed as count and percentage. Firstly, the univariable risk regression generalized linear model and cluster hospitals were used to identify the possible independent risk factors for mortality. The clinically significant variables and all variables that have P-value less than 0.01 were included in the multivariable analysis model. Secondly, multivariable risk regression analysis with generalized linear model cluster hospitals and step-backward method were used to identify the independent risk factors for mortality. A P-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chiang rai Prachanukroh Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand. Date of approved 22 January 2013 is number 032/2013, Research ID: 1461/Study Code: COM-13-1461-EX.

Results

The study enrolled 1,504 patients diagnosed with NF. The mortality rate was 19.3% (n=290) and the survival rate was 80.7% (n=1,214). Among the fatalities, 92.8% (n=269) died at admission and 7.2% (n=21) died after discharge from the hospital but within 28 days after surgery. Organisms cultured from blood and wounds are shown in Table 1. Blood cultures were performed in 428 (28.6%) of 1,502 patients. A positive isolated blood culture was found in 73 patients (17.1%). No bacteria were found in 355 patients (82.9%). Wound cultures were performed in 729 (48.5%) of 1,503 patients. Positive isolated specimens comprised 469 patients (64.3%), and negative ones comprised 260 patients (35.7%). Data for two patients in blood culture and one patient in wound culture were omitted owing to a lack of medical records. Blood culture was performed in 144 patients (9.6%), wound culture was performed in 450 patients (29.9%), and both blood and wound cultures were performed in 285 patients (19.0%). Overall cultures were done in 879 patients (58.4%). Data for two patients who had blood cultures and one patient who had a wound culture were omitted owing to a lack of medical records. The number of patients who had mixed infected organism (gram positive organism and gram negative organism) in the wound culture or the blood culture were 39 patients (5.3%) and 3 patients (0.7%), respectively. The number of patients who have multiple infected organism (more than one gram positive or gram negative organism) in wound culture and blood culture are 47 patients (6.4%) and 3 patients (0.7%), respectively. Streptococcus pyogenes was the most common gram positive organism in both blood culture (3.7%) and wound culture (22.9%) in the mortality group and in both blood culture (2.1%) and wound culture (15.9%) in the survival group. The overall percentage of S. pyogenes infection was 43.2% in the mortality group and 39.2% in the survival group. Escherichia coli was the most common gram negative organism in both blood culture (3.7%) and wound culture (13.7%) in the mortality group and wound culture (5.4%) in the survival group. The overall percentage of E. coli infection was 17.8% in the mortality group and 27.4% in the survival group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in infected organism in either blood culture or wound culture between both groups (P-value >0.05).
Table 1

Microorganisms in blood and wound cultures in patients with necrotizing fasciitis – comparison between mortality group and survival group

OrganismMortality group
Survival group
BloodWoundBloodWound
Gram positive
Staphylococcus aureus3 (2.2)13 (9.9)2 (0.7)76 (12.8)
 Coagulase negative staphylococcus4 (2.9)6 (4.6)8 (2.8)20 (3.4)
Staphylococcus epidermidis3 (2.2)3 (2.3)5 (1.7)6 (1.0)
Staphylococcus saprophyticus2 (1.5)2 (1.5)1 0.39 (1.5)
Streptococcus pyogenes5 (3.7)30 (22.9)6 (2.1)94 (15.9)
Streptococcus pneumoniae1 (0.7)2 (1.5)2 (0.7)1 (0.2)
 Other gram positive5 (3.7)2 (1.6)5 (1.7)21 (3.6)
Gram negative
Acinetobacter spp.2 (1.5)15 (11.5)1 (0.3)24 (4.0)
Stenotophomonas spp.0 (0.0)1 (0.8)1 (0.4)1 (0.2)
Salmonella spp.0 (0.0)0 (0.0)2 (0.7)1 (0.2)
Citrobacter spp.0 (0.0)4 (3.1)2 (0.7)14 (2.4)
Escherichia coli5 (3.7)18 (13.7)1 (0.3)32 (5.4)
 Other gram negative11 (8.2)28 (21.4)6 (2.1)99 (16.8)

Notes: There were no statistically significant differences in organisms in either blood culture or wound culture between both groups (P-value >0.05). Values are n (%).

Different characteristics between the groups included sex, age, BMI, education, occupation, underlying morbidity such as chronic heart disease, cirrhosis, hypertension, gout, and wound appearance such as erythema, hemorrhagic bleb, severe pain and site of infection, as shown in Table 2. This table demonstrates that female sex age more than 60 years, patients who have no education, or elderly patients who stay at home most of the time are risk factors for mortality in NF patients by univariable analysis. Most of the laboratory findings and vital signs either on admission or within 48–72 hours after admission of patients in the mortality group were statistically significantly worse than those in the survival group; they include higher polymorphonuclear cell (PMN) predominant, higher serum creatinine, lower bicarbonate (more acidosis), lower total serum protein, higher pulse rate, and lower systolic blood pressure. Furthermore, the number of patients in the mortality group presenting with severe sepsis was significantly higher than that in the survival group, as shown in Table 3.
Table 2

Demographic characteristics and clinical manifestations in patients with necrotizing fasciitis – comparison between mortality group and survival group (n=1,504)

CharacteristicsMortality group (n=290)Survival group (n=1,214)P-value
Sex0.006
 Male142 (49.0)704 (58.0)
 Female148 (51.0)509 (42.0)
Age (year)<0.001
 <6091 (31.7)599 (49.8)
 ≥60196 (68.3)605 (50.2)
BMI (kg/m2)0.025
 ≤18.5030 (12.2)166 (15.2)
 18.51–29.9992 (37.6)482 (44.2)
 ≥30.00123 (50.2)443 (40.6)
Education<0.001
 No education178 (61.4)474 (39.2)
 Primary education109 (37.6)652 (53.8)
 Secondary education1 (0.3)61 (5.0)
 Bachelor’s degree or higher2 (0.7)24 (2.0)
Occupation<0.001
 Elderly who stay at home165 (56.9)533 (43.9)
 Farmers/laborers116 (40.0)616 (50.8)
 Official9 (3.1)64 (5.3)
Underlying morbidity
 Diabetes80 (27.6)306 (25.2)0.411
 Heart disease40 (13.9)56 (4.6)<0.001
 Renal disease13 (4.5)32 (2.6)0.122
 Cirrhosis23 (7.9)38 (3.1)0.001
 Hypertension138 (47.6)399 (32.9)<0.001
 Gout48 (16.5)99 (8.2)<0.001
 Chronic alcoholism41 (14.1)191 (15.7)0.528
Wound appearance
 Swelling233 (80.3)1,008 (83.0)0.302
 Erythema188 (64.8)584 (48.1)<0.001
 Bleb166 (57.2)484 (39.9)<0.001
 Skin necrosis84 (29.0)318 (26.2)0.338
 Gangrene8 (2.8)29 (2.4)0.675
 Severe pain266 (91.7)1,048 (86.4)0.014
Site of wound0.015
 Head and neck0 (0.0)8 (0.6)
 Trunk11 (3.8)17 (1.4)
 Upper limb53 (18.3)222 (18.3)
 Lower limb216 (74.5)943 (77.7)
 Fournier’s gangrene3 (1.0)2 (0.2)
 Multiple sites7 (2.4)22 (1.8)
Hospital0.021
 Chiang Rai165 (56.9)650 (53.5)
 KamphaengPhet111 (38.3)445 (36.7)
 Phayao14 (4.8)119 (9.8)

Note: Values are n (%).

Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.

Table 3

Laboratory findings, vital signs, treatment modalities, and outcome of treatment – comparison between mortality group and survival group (n=1,504)

CharacteristicsMortality group (n=290)Survival group (n=1,214)P-value
Laboratory on admission
 WBC (/mm3)15,992.3± 10,783.417,126.4±8,718.60.002
 PMN (%)84.4±12.181.5±12.1<0.001
 Creatinine (mg/dL)2.8±1.81.7±1.3<0.001
 Bicarbonate (mmol/L)17.0±5.222.6±4.6<0.001
 Total protein (g/dL)5.7±1.06.6±1.0<0.001
Laboratory 48–72 hours
 WBC (/mm3)17,242.9±9,569.313,379.2±7,173.1<0.001
 PMN (%)83.9±13.876.6± 14.6<0.001
 Creatinine (mg/dL)3.0±2.11.9±1.7<0.001
 Bicarbonate (mmol/L)15.3±5.724.3± 13.70.006
 Total protein (g/dL)5.3±1.06.0±1.30.001
Vital signs on admission
 Body temperature (°C)37.3±0.937.3±0.90.317
 Pulse (/min)98.3±19.589.8±14.6<0.001
 Respiratory (/min)20.0±7.520.2±2.10.512
 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)104.0±25.6120.3±22.9<0.001
 Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)62.8±16.272.0±13.8<0.001
Vital signs 48–72 hours
 Body temperature (°C)37.5±1.137.2±0.7<0.001
 Pulse (beats/min)99.1±20.285.9±12.0<0.001
 Respiratory (breaths/min)17.0±8.719.9±2.60.299
 Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)116.4±22.2121.4±16.7<0.001
 Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)69.3±14.273.3±10.6<0.001
Treatment and outcome
 I&D5 (1.7)40 (3.3)0.183
 Debridement169 (58.3)791 (65.2)0.030
 Fasciotomy131 (45.2)521 (43.0)0.510
 Amputation28 (9.7)99 (8.2)0.411
 Severe sepsis185 (73.1)54 (4.5)<0.001
 Length of hospital stay (day)10.1 (18.1)11.6 (11.0)<0.001

Note: Values are mean ± standard deviation or n (%).

Abbreviations: WBC, white blood cell count; PMN, polymorphonuclear cell or neutrophil; I&D, incision and drainage.

The clinically significant variables such as skin necrosis and all variables that have P-value of less than 0.01 are included in the multivariable analysis model. Multivariable risk regression analysis with generalized linear model cluster hospitals and step-backward method demonstrated that the predictors of mortality among patients with NF were being female (risk ratio [RR] =1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.01–1.84, P=0.038), age >60 (RR =1.39, 95% CI =1.25–1.53, P<0.001), having chronic heart disease (RR =1.64, 95% CI =1.18–2.28, P=0.003), cirrhosis (RR =2.36, 95% CI =1.70–3.27, P<0.001), skin necrosis (RR =1.22, 95% CI =1.15–1.28, P<0.001), pulse rate >130/min (RR =2.26, 95% CI =1.79–2.85, P<0.001), systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg (RR =2.05, 95% CI =1.44–2.91, P<0.001), and serum creatinine ≥1.6 mg/dL (RR =3.06, 95% CI =2.08–4.50, P<0.001), as shown in Table 4.
Table 4

Independent predictors of mortality in patients with necrotizing fasciitis using multivariable analysis generalized linear model (n=1,504)

Risk factorsRR95% CIP-value
Female1.371.01–1.840.038
Age >601.391.25–1.53<0.001
Chronic heart disease1.641.18–2.280.003
Cirrhosis2.361.70–3.27<0.001
Necrosis1.221.15–1.28<0.001
Pulse rate >130/min2.261.79–2.85<0.001
Systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg2.051.44–2.91<0.001
Creatinine ≥1.6 mg/dL3.062.08–4.50<0.001

Abbreviations: RR, relative risk ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

NF is an important surgical infection, and there is a high incidence of it in Thailand, especially in the northern part, because people there are mainly farmers and laborers, most of them with low education and practicing low hygiene. Caring for wounds or preventing serious infection is still a problem in northern Thailand’s health care system. NF is of surgical urgency with a high mortality rate, even with sufficient treatment, with the reported rate of mortality varying from 6% to 36%.5–8,10 The overall mortality rate in this study was 19.3% (290 patients) of 1,504 patients. These patients had adverse outcomes, and although the cases were investigated and treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics by emergency physicians, these patients died rapidly from systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).5 However, identification of independent risk factors of death could have had some effect on survival and could have assisted surgeons to counter these risk factors as much as possible to achieve a successful outcome of treatment in all patients. At admission time, this study identified the following risk factors for mortality: being female; age >60 years; having chronic heart disease, liver cirrhosis, skin necrosis, pulse rate >130/min, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, and serum creatinine level ≥1.6 mg/dL, and these findings were similar to those of many previous studies.4,7,11,12,14 In this study, sex affected the outcome of treatment and could predict mortality. Females were at greater risk for mortality. This study found that the number of females with a BMI ≥30 was significantly higher than that of males (74.6% versus 38.6%, P-value 0.004). A possible reason was that females have a greater amount of subcutaneous fat than men and are more easily prone to infection. Elliott et al11 reviewed 198 patients between March 1985 and June 1993, and also found that being female was an independent predictor of death. However, some studies have reported that sex did not influence mortality.7,14–16,20 Elderly persons with or without underlying diseases, such as chronic heart disease and liver cirrhosis, are considered as having worse prognostic factors, similar to previous studies reporting that advanced age was associated with an increased risk of mortality.6,7,12,13,21,22 This study found that being more than 60 years old increased the mortality rate significantly. However, some studies found that advanced age had no effect on mortality.5,8,16,17 NF occurred frequently in patients with underlying diseases. Diabetes was the most frequent comorbidity in NF patients. Previous studies reported that poorly controlled DM in NF patients can cause adverse outcomes.23–27 In this study, DM did not demonstrate association in terms of survival. We did not explore in detail blood glucose as this data could not be extracted from the patients medical records. One possible reason is that most of our patients might have well-controlled DM. Therefore, further study should be performed to establish the exact effect of DM on adverse outcome or survival in NF patients. We also found that other underlying diseases such as chronic heart disease or liver cirrhosis were associated with higher mortality, as did previous studies.6,12,14,15,28 Patients with liver cirrhosis have a higher sensitivity to infection than those without. The mechanism for increased mortality in cirrhotic patients with infection may be immunologic and mechanical. Abnormalities affect immunity in patients with cirrhosis featuring cellular immunity and humoral immunity, T lymphocyte and B lymphocyte dysfunctions caused by malnutrition.29 The abnormal defensive mechanism could be caused by decreasing phagocytic activity of the reticuloendothelial system, impaired function monocyte and incomplete chemotaxis.28 Moreover, we found that skin necrosis was associated with higher mortality as in previous studies.17,30 Infection and toxin-producing bacteria can cause skin necrosis and multiple organ failure. All necrotic tissue, including fascia, must be removed by surgical debridement to reduce the bacteria, and broad-spectrum antibiotics should be administered promptly whenever NF is diagnosed.31 A pulse rate of more than 130 beats per minute and systolic blood pressure of less than 90 mmHg were also associated with increased mortality. The consequences of septic shock occurred in patients with severe systemic infection.32 Septic shock was a typical complication in patients with NF.33 In patients with septic shock, hypotension (a systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg) was a significant risk factor for organ dysfunction and death, as reported in previous studies.3,15,16,34 Clinical suspicion must lead to promptly maintained fluid resuscitation with intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics and aggressive surgical debridement.33 However, in patients with NF and septic shock, to maintain these changes in the circulation may lead to acute kidney failure and elevate serum creatinine.35 Referring to laboratory findings, increased serum creatinine has been an associated risk factor of death in NF, which has also been reported by many previous studies.6,11,12,14,17 Increased creatinine levels can be used to predict impaired renal function most likely associated with septic shock, and may indicate renal failure. Acute renal failure in NF patients was a life-threatening condition when treatment was delayed or not cautious enough.17 All patients with a confirmed, progressive increase in their serum creatinine level should consult with a nephrologist for dialysis.36 Regarding the hospital variable, all the three hospitals are provincial hospitals, and, therefore, the health care system is the same with no difference in hospital conditions. Also, the mortality of NF did not differ among the hospitals. Although the P-value of the hospital variable is 0.021, we set a P-value of 0.01 as statistically significant difference, and, therefore, there is no difference in mortality among the hospitals. In the review of literature, prognostic tools to evaluate the severity of NF patients on admission included the LRINEC (laboratory risk indicator for NF) score, composed of six marker variables, including C-reactive protein, total white blood cell count, hemoglobin, serum sodium, serum creatinine, and serum glucose;37 and APACHE II (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II) scores were used as a prognostic scoring system for critical care including the patient’s vital signs (temperature, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate), oxygenation (A-PaO2 [FiO2 >50%] or PaO2 [FiO2 <50%], metabolic parameters (sodium, potassium, creatinine, bicarbonate concentrations [Arterial pH or HCO3], hematocrit, white blood cell count), and Glasgow coma score and calculates a score relating to severity of the disease of a patient who was admitted to the ICU.38 The limitations of this study include the following: we could not apply either of these scoring systems (LRINEC and APACHE II), because this study was a retrospective study, some important data could have been omitted because of insufficient medical records and laboratory limitations in provincial hospitals such as unexamined serum C-reactive protein arterial blood gas in all patients. Unfortunately, some data were not available in the clinical manifestations such as non-recorded Glasgow coma score.

Conclusion

Risk factors of mortality in patients with NF included being female; age >60 years; having chronic heart disease, liver cirrhosis, skin necrosis, pulse rate >130/min, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, and serum creatinine level ≥1.6 mg/dL. Thus, patients presenting any clinical predictors should direct concern toward progression of disease and might be considered for early investigation or close monitoring to prevent morbidity and mortality as much as possible. In addition, health care promotion should be directed toward preventing adverse events and early detection of NF.
  37 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in Fournier gangrene.

Authors:  Jaime Ruiz-Tovar; Luis Córdoba; Jose Manuel Devesa
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 2.767

2.  Predictors of mortality and limb loss in necrotizing soft tissue infections.

Authors:  Daniel A Anaya; Kerry McMahon; Avery B Nathens; Stephen R Sullivan; Hugh Foy; Eileen Bulger
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2005-02

3.  Independent predictors of mortality for necrotizing fasciitis: a retrospective analysis in a single institution.

Authors:  Kuo-Feng Huang; Min-Hsiang Hung; Yu-San Lin; Chin-Li Lu; Cheng Liu; Chun-Chia Chen; Yen-Hsun Lee
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2011-08

4.  Microbiology and surgical indicators of necrotizing fasciitis in a tertiary hospital of southwest Taiwan.

Authors:  Yao-Hung Tsai; Kuo-Chin Huang; Shih-Hsun Shen; Wei-Hsiu Hsu; Kuo-Ti Peng; Tsung-Jen Huang
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Elevated levels of serum creatinine: recommendations for management and referral.

Authors:  D C Mendelssohn; B J Barrett; L M Brownscombe; J Ethier; D E Greenberg; S D Kanani; A Levin; E B Toffelmire
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-08-24       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Correlates of length of stay, cost of care, and mortality among patients hospitalized for necrotizing fasciitis.

Authors:  Z D Mulla; S G Gibbs; D M Aronoff
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 2.451

7.  Predictors of mortality in patients with necrotizing fasciitis.

Authors:  Cheng-Ting Hsiao; Hsu-Huei Weng; Yao-Dong Yuan; Chih-Tsung Chen; I-Chuan Chen
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.469

8.  [Necrotizing fasciitis in the lower extremity secondary to diabetic wounds].

Authors:  Burak Demirağ; Ali Onur Tirelioğlu; Bartu Sarisözen; Kemal Durak
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.511

Review 9.  Necrotizing fasciitis.

Authors:  Rukshini Puvanendran; Jason Chan Meng Huey; Shanker Pasupathy
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Necrotising soft tissue infection-risk factors for mortality.

Authors:  Kalaivani V; Bharati V Hiremath; Indumathi V A
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-01
View more
  19 in total

1.  First Reported Australian case of Fatal Streptococcal Group B Pneumonia (serotype 21) Necrotising fasciitis complicated by Toxic Shock Like Syndrome - A Case report and review.

Authors:  Nouran Gaber; Shalini Kandasamy; Alasdair Thomas; Timothy Chimunda
Journal:  IJID Reg       Date:  2022-01-13

2.  Management of necrotising fasciitis within a burns centre: do outcomes differ?

Authors:  Joseph A Ward; John A G Gibson; Dai Q Nguyen
Journal:  Scars Burn Heal       Date:  2020-06-30

3.  International normalised ratio as an independent predictor of mortality in limb necrotising fasciitis with sepsis.

Authors:  X W Ling; K Lin; X Q Jiang; Q Wu; Z J Liu; S Li; S Zhao; C Lin
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Necrotizing Fasciitis: A Predictable Burden in Rural Kenya.

Authors:  Joyce Lunar; Sinkeet S Ranketi; Beverly Owino; Mark Oloo; Robert K Parker
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Presentation and outcomes of necrotizing soft tissue infections.

Authors:  Kuan-Chin Jean Chen; Michelle Klingel; Shelley McLeod; Sean Mindra; Victor K Ng
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2017-07-31

6.  The laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (LRINEC) scoring: the diagnostic and potential prognostic role.

Authors:  Ayman El-Menyar; Mohammad Asim; Insolvisagan N Mudali; Ahammed Mekkodathil; Rifat Latifi; Hassan Al-Thani
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Necrotizing Fasciitis Among Patients With Liver Cirrhosis in Texas, 2001 - 2010: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lavi Oud; Phillip Watkins
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2015-12-28

8.  Pattern and predictors of mortality in necrotizing fasciitis patients in a single tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Gaby Jabbour; Ayman El-Menyar; Ruben Peralta; Nissar Shaikh; Husham Abdelrahman; Insolvisagan Natesa Mudali; Mohamed Ellabib; Hassan Al-Thani
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Fatal Acinetobacter baumanii Necrotizing Fasciitis following Open Reduction Internal Fixation in a Polytrauma Patient.

Authors:  Alexandre Nehme; Nabih I Joukhadar; Elias Saidy; Mohammad Darwiche; Dany K Aouad; Hicham G Abdel Nour
Journal:  Case Rep Infect Dis       Date:  2018-06-21

10.  Idiopathic necrotizing fasciitis following fracture fixation: A case report.

Authors:  Muhammad Umar Joomun; Zhiya Li; Deting Xue; Huawei Shao; Zhijun Pan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.