Literature DB >> 25733779

Asymptomatic urinary tract infection among pregnant women receiving ante-natal care in a traditional birth home in Benin City, Nigeria.

Bankole H Oladeinde1, Richard Omoregie2, Oladapo B Oladeinde3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A good proportion of pregnant women patronize traditional birth homes in Nigeria for ante-natal care. This study aimed at determining the prevalence, risk factors, and susceptibility profile of etiologic agents of urinary tract infection among ante-natal attendees in a traditional birth home in Benin City, Nigeria.
METHODS: Clean-catch urine was collected from 220 pregnant women attending a traditional birth home in Benin City, Nigeria. Urine samples were processed, and microbial isolates identified using standard bacteriological procedures. A cross-sectional study design was used.
RESULTS: The prevalence of urinary tract infection among pregnant women was 55.0%, significantly affected by parity and gestational age (P<0.05). Mixed infection was recorded among 13(10.7%) pregnant women, and was unaffected by maternal age, parity, gravidity, gestational age, and educational status. Irrespective of trimester Escherichia coli was the most prevalent etiologic agent of urinary tract infection, followed by Staphylococcus aureus. The flouroquinolones were the most effective antibacterial agents, while Sulphamethoxazole-trimetoprim, Amoxicillin, Nalidixic acid, and Nitrofurantoin had poor activity against uropathogens isolated.
CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of urinary tract infection among pregnant women was 55.0% and significantly affected by gestational age and parity. The most prevalent etiologic agent observed was Escherichia coli. With the exception of the flouroquinolones, aminoglycoside, and Amoxicillin-cluvanate, the activity of other antibiotics used on uropathogens were poor. Health education of the traditional birth attendant and her clients by relevant intervention agencies is strongly advocated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nigeria; Urinary tract infection; orthodox birth center; pregnancy; traditional birth center

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25733779      PMCID: PMC4337079          DOI: 10.4314/ejhs.v25i1.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci        ISSN: 1029-1857


Introduction

Urinary tract infection remains a leading cause of health care expenditure for people of all age groups (1). It is a serious health problem especially for women as up to a third of all women experience urinary tract infection at some point in their lives (2). Although often asymptomatic (3), the association of urinary tract infection with pregnancy could progress to symptomatic bacteriuria with fatal obstetric consequences such as pylonephritis, low birth weights and very high mortality rates (4). In Nigeria, a good proportion of indigenous women patronize traditional and religious birth homes for antenatal care (5). The traditional birth attendant (TBA) apart from being known to provide care for women during pregnancy (6, 7), presently deliver the majority of women in Nigeria as in other developing countries (6). Antenatal education promotes better pregnancy outcome and care for neonates (8, 9). This service is poor in traditional birth homes as the traditional birth attendants have been reported to be largely uneducated (10). They may therefore not be rightly placed to pass valuable information on disease prevention to their clients. This service is poor in traditional birth homes as the traditional birth attendants have been reported to be largely uneducated (10). They may therefore not be rightly placed to pass valuable information on disease prevention to their clients. Studies have shown in developing countries that a woman's level of education is a major determinant of her health seeking behavior (11, 12). Poverty and low educational status have been linked with patronage and delivery of pregnant women by traditional birth attendants (13, 14). These factors have also been shown to be associated with urinary tract infection in pregnancy (15). Although data on prevalence of asymptomatic urinary tract infection among pregnant women abound, to the best of our knowledge, none have focused on pregnant women receiving ante-natal care in traditional birth homes. With this background, this study therefore focused on determining the prevalence, risk factors, and susceptibility profile of etiologic agents, of urinary tract infection among pregnant women attending ante-natal clinics in a traditional birth home in Benin City, Nigeria

Methods and Patients

Study population: A cross-sectional study was conducted between June 2011 to November 2011 among pregnant women attending ante-natal clinics at a leading traditional birth center in Benin City, Nigeria. A total of two hundred and twenty (220) pregnant women with age ranging from (17–39) years were recruited for this study. Pregnant women who received ante-natal care in an orthodox birth facility were not considered for this study. Exclusion criteria also included usage of antibiotics within a week and large intake of water (less than an hour) before clinic attendance. Socio-demographic data were obtained by means of personal interview. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all pregnant women and their spouses. Approval for this work was given by Edo State Ministry of Health, Benin City. Specimen collection and processing: Clean-catch midstream urine was collected from each patient into sterile screw-capped universal container, containing few crystals of boric acid as preservative. The specimen was mixed, labeled and transported to the laboratory for processing within one hour. A loopful (0.001mL) of well mixed un-centrifuged urine was streaked on to the surface of blood agar and cysteine lactose electrolyte deficient medium (CLED) medium (M6: Plasmatec Laboratories, United Kingdom). The plates were incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 hrs, and counts were expressed as colony forming units (CFU per mililitre (mL). A count ≥ 105 was considered significant to indicate urinary tract infection. Ten ml of each well -mixed urine sample was centrifuged at 2000g for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded and a drop of the deposit was examined microscopically at high magnification for pus cells, epithelial cells, cast, crystals, yeast-like cells, and trichomonas vaginalis. Pus cells ≥ 5 per high power field were considered significant to indicate infection. Urinary tract infection was diagnosed, if the bacteria, or pus cell count or both were significant in an individual. The isolates were identified by standard microbiological methods (16). The susceptibility test for bacterial isolates was performed by BSAC method (17). Statistical analysis: The data were analyzed using Chi-square (X2) test, with the statistical software INSTAT ®.Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Significant bacteria growth was recorded in urine specimen from a total of one hundred and twenty one pregnant women representing (55.0%) of all pregnant women studied. Out of the 121 positive cultures, 108(89.3%) had single microbial growth while 13(10.7%) had more than one organism. Parity and gestational age were significant risk factors for acquiring urinary tract infection among pregnant women (P<0.05). Maternal age, parity, gravidity, gestational age and educational did not significantly affect the prevalence of mixed infection (P>0.05). Irrespective of trimester, Escherichia coil was the most predominant etiologic agent of urinary tract infection, followed by Staphylococcus aureus. Candida albicans was the only fungi isolated in this study. (Table 2).While the flouroquinolones were the most effective antibacterial agents, Sulphamethoxazole-trimetoprim, Amoxicillin, Nalidixic acid, and Nitrofurantoin, all had poor activity against uropathogens from pregnant women studied (Table 3).
Table 2

Prevalence of uropathogens among pregnant women

Bacterial (n)1st Trimester N (%)2nd Trimester N (%)3rd Trimester N (%)
Escherichia coli (51)6(35.3)20 (38.5)25(37.9)
Klebsiella spp (16)1(5.9)6 (11.5)9(13.6)
Proteus spp (11)1 (5.9)4(7.7)6 (9.1)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14)2(11.8)6(11.5)6(9.1)
Staphylococus aureus (32)5(29.4)12(23.1)15(22.7)
Enterococuss feacalis (2)-1(1.9)1(1.5)
Candida albicans (9)2(11.8)3(5.8)4(6.1)

Total175266

N- number of isolates

Table 3

Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of uropathogens from pregnant women

Antibacterial agent µg/DISC

Bacterial agents (n)CIPOFLPEFGENAUGSXTAMXNANIT
(5)(5)(5)(10)(30)(25)(30)(30)(300)
Escherichia colI (51)51(100)50(98.0)40(78.4)42(82.4)29(56.8)9(17.6)7(13.7)14(27.4)21(41.1)
Klebsiella species (16)16(100)16(100)11(68.7)11(68.7)8(50.0)2(12.5)1(6.2)4(25.0)7(43.7)
Proteus species (11)11(100)11(100)6(54.5)8(72.7)5(45.5)1(9.0)0(0)1(9.0)0(0)
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa (14)10(71.4)8(57.1)6(42.8)5(35.7)0(0)0(0)0(0)0(0)0(0)
Staphylococus aureus (32)30(93.8)28(87.5)23(71.8)20(60.5)11(34.4)3(9.3)1(0)4(12.5)1(34.4)
Enterococuss feacalis (2)2(100)2(100)2(100)2(100)1(50)0(0)0(0)0(0)1(50)

Total 126120(95.2)115(91.3)88(69.8)88(69.8)54(42.9)15(11.9)9(7.1)23(18.3)40(31.7)

CIP-Ciprofloxacin, OFL-Ofloxacin, PEF-Pefloxacin, GEN-Gentimycin, AUG-Amoxicillin-cluvanate, SXT-Sulphamethoxazole-Trimetoprim, AMX-Amoxicillin, NA-Nalidixic acid, NIT-Nitrofurantoin

Prevalence of uropathogens among pregnant women N- number of isolates Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of uropathogens from pregnant women CIP-Ciprofloxacin, OFL-Ofloxacin, PEF-Pefloxacin, GEN-Gentimycin, AUG-Amoxicillin-cluvanate, SXT-Sulphamethoxazole-Trimetoprim, AMX-Amoxicillin, NA-Nalidixic acid, NIT-Nitrofurantoin

Discussion

The health status of the pregnant woman attending unorthodox birth centers in Nigeria has been overlooked, even though studies suggest that a good number of pregnant women in the country deliver their babies outside modern health facilities (5, 6). Against this background, this study was carried out to determine the prevalence, risk factors and susceptibility profile of etiologic agents of urinary tract infection among pregnant women attending ante-natal clinics at a traditional birth home in Benin City, Nigeria. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt aimed at assessing the prevalence of urinary tract infection among pregnant women receiving ante-natal care in traditional birth home. The prevalence of urinary tract infection observed in our study population was 55.0%. This is higher than reported figures in other African studies (3, 4). It is pertinent, however, to note that these studies were conducted among pregnant women attending ante-natal clinics in institutionalized health facilities were regular ante-natal education is more likely to be offered. Parity and gestational age significantly affected the prevalence of urinary tract infection. These have been previously reported (18, 19, 20). Pregnant women in the 3rd trimester of current pregnancy and those having more than one child were mostly at risk of acquiring urinary tract infection. Several anatomical and hormonal changes in pregnant women lead to urethral dilation and urinary stasis which contribute to increased risk of developing UTI (21). Urinary stasis increases with advancing pregnancy (22). This coupled with bad clean up technique, further complicated by heavily distended belly of pregnant women in the 3rd trimester may well explain the high prevalence of urinary tract infection observed among pregnant women in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy. Gravidity, maternal age and educational status did not affect the prevalence of urinary tract infection. This is consistent with previous findings (23, 24). The prevalence of mixed infection was not associated with maternal age, parity, gravidity, gestational age and educational status of pregnant women. Escherichia coli was the most prevalent etiologic agent of urinary tract infection among pregnant women studied. The leading role of Escherichia coliin urinary tract infection among pregnant women has been severally documented (3, 4). It is, however, in contrast with other findings (15, 19). Irrespective of trimester, Escherichia coli was the most prevalent etiologic agent of urinary tract infection. The flouroquinolones were the most active antibacterial agent observed in this study. Sadly, however, these antibiotics have limited use in pregnancy. Moderate activity against bacterial isolates was observed with Gentimycin, and Amoxicillin-cluvanate, while very poor performance of Nitrofurantoin, Nalidixic acid, Amoxicillin and Sulphamethoxazole-Trimetoprim was recorded against uropathogens isolated from this study. Prescription of antibiotics without laboratory guidance as well as over-the-counter sales of antibiotics without prescription is rife in Nigeria, and has been adduced as a possible reasons for increased bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents in the country. (25). In conclusion, the prevalence of urinary tract infection among pregnant women was 55.0%, and was significantly affected by parity and gestational age. Escherichia coli was the most prevalent etiologic agent of urinary tract infection among pregnant women. Poor to moderate antimicrobial activity against uropathogens was observed with antibiotics used except for the flouroquinolones. Health education of ante-natal populations in traditional birth centers by government and other intervention agencies is strongly advocated.
Table 1

Prevalence and risk factors among of urinary tract infection among pregnant women

CharacteristicsNNo infected (%)No mixed infection (%)P
Parity
Nulliparous10543(40.9)3(6.7)0.0003, 0.610*
Primiparous7047(67. 1)6(12.8)
Multiparous4531(68.8)4(12.9)
Gravidity
Primigravidae2811(39.3)1(9.1)0.482, 0.876*
Multigravidae19210(57.3)12(10.9)
Gestational age
1st Trimester3615(41.7)2(13.3)0.006,0.872*
2nd Trimester9648(50.0)4(8.3)
3rd Trimester8858(65.9)7(12.1)
Educational status
Tertiary249(37.5)0(0.0)0.205, 0.070*
Secondary11766(56.4)4(6.1)
Primary4725(53.2)4(16.0)
None3221(65.6)5(23.8)
Age (Years)
16–20151(6.6)0 (0.0)0.051, 0.461*
21–25443(52.3)2(8.7)
26–3011067 (60.9)7(10.4)
31–353525(71.4)3(12.0)
36–40165(31.3)1(20.0)

N - number tested; P*- P value mixed infection

  17 in total

1.  Incidence of urinary tract infection during pregnancy.

Authors:  M A Sheikh; M S Khan; A Khatoon; G M Arain
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2000 Mar-May       Impact factor: 1.628

2.  Risk factors related to asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnant women.

Authors:  Ekachai Kovavisarach; Maytina Vichaipruck; Suwattana Kanjarahareutai
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2009-05

3.  Multiple fractures and iatrogenic burns in a newborn due to unskilled delivery: a case report.

Authors:  Ayebo E Sadoh; Reuben O Ogungbe
Journal:  Afr J Reprod Health       Date:  2008-12

4.  Bacterial isolates and drug susceptibility patterns of urinary tract infection among pregnant women at Muhimbili National Hospital in Tanzania.

Authors:  Sabrina J Moyo; Said Aboud; Mabula Kasubi; Samuel Y Maselle
Journal:  Tanzan J Health Res       Date:  2010-10

5.  Asymptomatic bacteriuria of pregnancy in Ibadan, Nigeria: a re-assessment.

Authors:  O Akinloye; D O Ogbolu; O M Akinloye; O A Terry Alli
Journal:  Br J Biomed Sci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.829

6.  Reasons given by pregnant women for late initiation of antenatal care in the niger delta, Nigeria.

Authors:  P N Ebeigbe; E P Ndidi; G O Igberase; I G Oseremen
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2010-06

Review 7.  Urinary tract infections during pregnancy.

Authors:  Jennifer Le; Gerald G Briggs; Anna McKeown; Gerardo Bustillo
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 3.154

8.  Urinary tract infection and adverse outcome of pregnancy.

Authors:  Shaira R Dimetry; Hanan M El-Tokhy; Nagla M Abdo; Moustafa A Ebrahim; Mohammed Eissa
Journal:  J Egypt Public Health Assoc       Date:  2007

9.  Determinants of use of maternal health services in Nigeria--looking beyond individual and household factors.

Authors:  Stella Babalola; Adesegun Fatusi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Socio-economic factors associated with delivery assisted by traditional birth attendants in Iraq, 2000.

Authors:  Seter Siziya; Adamson S Muula; Emmanuel Rudatsikira
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2009-04-02
View more
  5 in total

1.  Asymptomatic bacteriuria and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of the isolates among pregnant women attending Dessie referral hospital, Northeast Ethiopia: A hospital-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ismail Ebrie Ali; Teklay Gebrecherkos; Mucheye Gizachew; Martha Alemayehu Menberu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2018-02-13

2.  Prevalence, aetiology and antibiotic sensitivity profile of asymptomatic bacteriuria isolates from pregnant women in selected antenatal clinic from Nairobi, Kenya.

Authors:  Adelaide Ogutu Ayoyi; Gideon Kikuvi; Christine Bii; Samuel Kariuki
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-01-30

3.  Antimicrobial resistance in Africa: a systematic review.

Authors:  Birkneh Tilahun Tadesse; Elizabeth A Ashley; Stefano Ongarello; Joshua Havumaki; Miranga Wijegoonewardena; Iveth J González; Sabine Dittrich
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.667

4.  Prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility profile and predictors of asymptomatic bacteriuria among pregnant women in Adigrat General Hospital, Northern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Senait Tadesse; Tsega Kahsay; Gebre Adhanom; Getachew Kahsu; Haftom Legese; Aderajew G/Wahid; Awoke Derbie
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-10-19

5.  Urinary Bacterial Profile and Antibiotic Susceptibility in Pregnant Adolescents and Pregnant Low Obstetric Risk Adult Women.

Authors:  Henrique Diorio de Souza; Eliane Azeka Hase; Marco Aurelio Knippel Galletta; Giselle Rodrigues Mota Diorio; Adriana Lippi Waissman; Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco; Marcelo Zugaib
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.