Literature DB >> 25733548

Use of Negative-Pressure Wound Dressings to Prevent Surgical Site Complications After Primary Hip Arthroplasty: A Pilot RCT.

Brigid M Gillespie1, Claire M Rickard2, Lukman Thalib3, Evelyn Kang2, Tracey Finigan4, Allison Homer4, Gordon Lonie4, Don Pitchford4, Wendy Chaboyer2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is increasingly used for primary surgical incisions despite the paucity of evidence. Study objectives were to assess the use of NPWT on surgical sites to prevent infections and other wound complications after elective primary hip arthroplasty and to consider feasibility of a larger trial.
METHODS: A nonmasked, randomized controlled pilot trial. Patients were recruited preoperatively from the preadmission clinic of an Australian hospital during 2013-2014. Computer-generated randomization was performed with allocation concealed until completion of surgery. The intervention group received NPWT (PICO) while the control group received the standard care hydrocolloid, reinforced with 2 absorbent dressings. Patients were followed for 6 weeks for postoperative complications (infection, length of stay, readmission) and skin complications (bruising, seroma, hematoma, dehiscence). Feasibility end points included numbers recruited, randomized, and followed up; fidelity; and costs.
RESULTS: Of 77 people approached, 76 were recruited, and 70 were randomized. Of 35 in the negative-pressure group, 2 received the standard dressing. Attrition at 6 weeks exceeded 10% in both groups. Dressing costs were lower in the control group ($3.01/d vs $38.40/d); SSI incidence was 2/35 in the NPWT and 3/35 in the control group (intention to treat: risk ratio [RR] = 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.12-3.7; P = .65). NPWT patients experienced more postoperative wound complications (RR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.0-2.5; P = .04).
CONCLUSION: A reduction of 3% in SSI incidence suggests that a definitive trial requires approximately 900 patients per group. Yet there is uncertainty around the benefit of NPWT after elective hip arthroplasty.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; feasibility; hip replacement; infection; orthopedic; vacuum dressing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25733548     DOI: 10.1177/1553350615573583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Innov        ISSN: 1553-3506            Impact factor:   2.058


  19 in total

1.  Chest drainage systems in use.

Authors:  Charalambos Zisis; Katerina Tsirgogianni; George Lazaridis; Sofia Lampaki; Sofia Baka; Ioannis Mpoukovinas; Vasilis Karavasilis; Ioannis Kioumis; Georgia Pitsiou; Nikolaos Katsikogiannis; Kosmas Tsakiridis; Aggeliki Rapti; Georgia Trakada; Ilias Karapantzos; Chrysanthi Karapantzou; Athanasios Zissimopoulos; Konstantinos Zarogoulidis; Paul Zarogoulidis
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-03

2.  Are high-risk patient and revision arthroplasty effective indications for closed-incisional negative-pressure wound therapy after total hip or knee arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Ho Kim; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; Chunhu Shi; En Lin Goh; Elizabeth Ma Murphy; Adam Reid; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Jo C Dumville
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-04-26

4.  The impact of surgical site occurrences and the role of closed incision negative pressure therapy.

Authors:  Christian Willy; Michael Engelhardt; Marcus Stichling; Onnen Grauhan
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Intraoperative Considerations for Treatment/Prevention of Prosthetic Joint Infection.

Authors:  Linda I Suleiman; Daniel R Mesko; Denis Nam
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-09

6.  NEGATIVE-PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF COMPLEX INJURIES AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY.

Authors:  Camilo Partezani Helito; Daniel Kamura Bueno; Pedro Nogueira Giglio; Marcelo Batista Bonadio; José Ricardo Pécora; Marco Kawamura Demange
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

7.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Joan Webster; Zhenmi Liu; Gill Norman; Jo C Dumville; Laura Chiverton; Paul Scuffham; Monica Stankiewicz; Wendy P Chaboyer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-26

8.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; En Lin Goh; Jo C Dumville; Chunhu Shi; Zhenmi Liu; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Adam Reid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-01

9.  Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by primary closure.

Authors:  Gill Norman; En Lin Goh; Jo C Dumville; Chunhu Shi; Zhenmi Liu; Laura Chiverton; Monica Stankiewicz; Adam Reid
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-15

Review 10.  A systematic review and meta-analysis including GRADE qualification of the risk of surgical site infections after prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy compared with conventional dressings in clean and contaminated surgery.

Authors:  Fleur E E De Vries; Elon D Wallert; Joseph S Solomkin; Benedetta Allegranzi; Matthias Egger; E Patchen Dellinger; Marja A Boermeester
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.