Maryah Stella Fram1, Lorrene D Ritchie2, Nila Rosen3, Edward A Frongillo4. 1. College of Social Work and fram@mailbox.sc.edu. 2. Atkins Center for Weight and Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA; and Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA. 3. Atkins Center for Weight and Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA; and. 4. Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC;
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Food insecurity is associated with deficits in child development and health, but little is known about how children's specific food-insecurity experiences play out through nutritional and non-nutritional pathways that may compromise well-being. OBJECTIVE: This study used child self-reports of food insecurity to examine the types of food-insecurity experiences that were most prevalent and the relations between child food insecurity (CFI), child diet, and child physical activity (PA). METHODS:A total of 3605 fourth- and fifth-grade children whose schools participated in the Network for a Healthy California-Children's PowerPlay! campaign completed 24-h diary-assisted recalls and surveys including items from the Child Food Security Assessment and questions about PA. Data were analyzed by using regression and logistic regression models. RESULTS:CFI was present in 60% of the children and included experiences of cognitive, emotional, and physical awareness of food insecurity. Greater levels of CFI were associated with higher consumption of energy, fat, sugar, and fiber and a diet lower in vegetables. For instance, a child at the highest level of CFI, on average, consumed ∼494 kJ/d (118 kcal), 8 g/d of sugar, and 4 g/d of fat more than a food-secure child. Higher CFI was associated with a marginally significant difference (P = 0.06) in minutes of PA (17 min/d less for children at the highest level of CFI vs. those who were food secure) and with significantly greater perceived barriers to PA. CONCLUSIONS:CFI is a troublingly frequent, multidomain experience that influences children's well-being through both nutritional (dietary) and non-nutritional (e.g., PA) pathways. CFI may lead to poor-quality diet and less PA and their developmental consequences. Practitioners should consider CFI when assessing child health and well-being and can do so by asking children directly about their CFI experiences.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Food insecurity is associated with deficits in child development and health, but little is known about how children's specific food-insecurity experiences play out through nutritional and non-nutritional pathways that may compromise well-being. OBJECTIVE: This study used child self-reports of food insecurity to examine the types of food-insecurity experiences that were most prevalent and the relations between child food insecurity (CFI), child diet, and child physical activity (PA). METHODS: A total of 3605 fourth- and fifth-grade children whose schools participated in the Network for a Healthy California-Children's PowerPlay! campaign completed 24-h diary-assisted recalls and surveys including items from the Child Food Security Assessment and questions about PA. Data were analyzed by using regression and logistic regression models. RESULTS: CFI was present in 60% of the children and included experiences of cognitive, emotional, and physical awareness of food insecurity. Greater levels of CFI were associated with higher consumption of energy, fat, sugar, and fiber and a diet lower in vegetables. For instance, a child at the highest level of CFI, on average, consumed ∼494 kJ/d (118 kcal), 8 g/d of sugar, and 4 g/d of fat more than a food-secure child. Higher CFI was associated with a marginally significant difference (P = 0.06) in minutes of PA (17 min/d less for children at the highest level of CFI vs. those who were food secure) and with significantly greater perceived barriers to PA. CONCLUSIONS: CFI is a troublingly frequent, multidomain experience that influences children's well-being through both nutritional (dietary) and non-nutritional (e.g., PA) pathways. CFI may lead to poor-quality diet and less PA and their developmental consequences. Practitioners should consider CFI when assessing child health and well-being and can do so by asking children directly about their CFI experiences.
Authors: Lauren E Au; Sonya M Zhu; Lilly A Nhan; Kaela R Plank; Edward A Frongillo; Barbara A Laraia; Klara Gurzo; Lorrene D Ritchie Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: M J Landry; E Khazaee; A K Markowitz; S Vandyousefi; R Ghaddar; K Pilles; F M Asigbee; N M Gatto; J N Davis Journal: J Hunger Environ Nutr Date: 2018-08-20
Authors: Tanya L Alderete; Rima Habre; Claudia M Toledo-Corral; Kiros Berhane; Zhanghua Chen; Frederick W Lurmann; Marc J Weigensberg; Michael I Goran; Frank D Gilliland Journal: Diabetes Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 9.461