Literature DB >> 25733460

Sugar-sweetened product consumption alters glucose homeostasis compared with dairy product consumption in men and women at risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Kevin C Maki1, Kristin M Nieman2, Arianne L Schild2, Valerie N Kaden2, Andrea L Lawless2, Kathleen M Kelley2, Tia M Rains2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dietary patterns characterized by high intakes of fruits and vegetables, whole grains, low-fat dairy products, and low glycemic load have been associated with lower type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) risk. In contrast, dietary patterns that include high intakes of refined grains, processed meats, and high amounts of added sugars have been associated with increased T2DM risk.
OBJECTIVE: This randomized, 2-period crossover trial compared the effects of dairy and sugar-sweetened product (SSP) consumption on insulin sensitivity and pancreatic β-cell function in men and women at risk of the development of T2DM who habitually consume sugar-sweetened beverages.
METHODS: In a randomized, controlled crossover trial, participants consumed dairy products (474 mL/d 2% milk and 170 g/d low-fat yogurt) and SSPs (710 mL/d nondiet soda and 108 g/d nondairy pudding), each for 6 wk, with a 2-wk washout between treatments. A liquid meal tolerance test (LMTT) was administered at baseline and the end of each period.
RESULTS: Participants were 50% female with a mean age and body mass index of 53.8 y and 32.2 kg/m(2), respectively. Changes from baseline were significantly different between dairy product and SSP conditions for median homeostasis model assessment 2-insulin sensitivity (HOMA2-%S) (1.3 vs. -21.3%, respectively, P = 0.009; baseline = 118%), mean LMTT disposition index (-0.03 vs. -0.36, respectively, P = 0.011; baseline = 2.59), mean HDL cholesterol (0.8 vs. -4.2%, respectively, P = 0.015; baseline = 44.3 mg/dL), and mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] (11.7 vs. -3.3, respectively, P = 0.022; baseline = 24.5 μg/L). Changes from baseline in LMTT Matsuda insulin sensitivity index (-0.10 vs. -0.49, respectively; baseline = 4.16) and mean HOMA2-β-cell function (-2.0 vs. 5.3%, respectively; baseline = 72.6%) did not differ significantly between treatments.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that SSP consumption is associated with less favorable values for HOMA2-%S, LMTT disposition index, HDL cholesterol, and serum 25(OH)D in men and women at risk of T2DM vs. baseline values and values during dairy product consumption. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01936935.
© 2015 American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Insulin sensitivity; dairy; lipoproteins; sugars; type 2 diabetes mellitus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25733460     DOI: 10.3945/jn.114.204503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.798


  14 in total

Review 1.  Effect of Yogurt Consumption on Metabolic Syndrome Risk Factors: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Leila Khorraminezhad; Iwona Rudkowska
Journal:  Curr Nutr Rep       Date:  2021-01-06

2.  Effect of dairy consumption and its fat content on glycemic control and cardiovascular disease risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Joanna Mitri; Shaheen Tomah; Adham Mottalib; Veronica Salsberg; Sahar Ashrafzadeh; David M Pober; Ahmed H Eldib; Mhd Wael Tasabehji; Osama Hamdy
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 7.045

3.  Avocado Consumption for 12 Weeks and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Adults with Overweight or Obesity and Insulin Resistance.

Authors:  Xuhuiqun Zhang; Di Xiao; Gabriela Guzman; Indika Edirisinghe; Britt Burton-Freeman
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.687

Review 4.  High versus low-added sugar consumption for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Sara Bergwall; Anna Johansson; Emily Sonestedt; Stefan Acosta
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-01-05

Review 5.  The Effects of Breakfast Consumption and Composition on Metabolic Wellness with a Focus on Carbohydrate Metabolism.

Authors:  Kevin C Maki; Alyssa K Phillips-Eakley; Kristen N Smith
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 8.701

6.  The impact of diets rich in low-fat or full-fat dairy on glucose tolerance and its determinants: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kelsey A Schmidt; Gail Cromer; Maggie S Burhans; Jessica N Kuzma; Derek K Hagman; Imashi Fernando; Merideth Murray; Kristina M Utzschneider; Sarah Holte; Jana Kraft; Mario Kratz
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 8.472

Review 7.  Frequent Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption and the Onset of Cardiometabolic Diseases: Cause for Concern?

Authors:  Gaurang Deshpande; Rudo F Mapanga; M Faadiel Essop
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2017-11-02

8.  Food groups and intermediate disease markers: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Lukas Schwingshackl; Georg Hoffmann; Khalid Iqbal; Carolina Schwedhelm; Heiner Boeing
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Food sources of fructose-containing sugars and glycaemic control: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled intervention studies.

Authors:  Vivian L Choo; Effie Viguiliouk; Sonia Blanco Mejia; Adrian I Cozma; Tauseef A Khan; Vanessa Ha; Thomas M S Wolever; Lawrence A Leiter; Vladimir Vuksan; Cyril W C Kendall; Russell J de Souza; David J A Jenkins; John L Sievenpiper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-11-21

10.  Effects of substituting eggs for high-carbohydrate breakfast foods on the cardiometabolic risk-factor profile in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Kevin C Maki; Orsolya M Palacios; Melvyn W Kramer; Rupal Trivedi; Mary R Dicklin; Meredith L Wilcox; Cathleen E Maki
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 4.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.