Literature DB >> 25733412

The CQC inspections: what they mean for general practice.

Alastair Blake1, Nigel Sparrow1, Steve Field1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25733412      PMCID: PMC4337279          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15X683845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  CQC inspections: unintended consequences of being placed in special measures.

Authors:  Sue Rendel; Helen Crawley; Tim Ballard
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The CQC inspections: not 'outstanding', may be 'good', but 'requires improvement'.

Authors:  Terry Kemple
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  CQC intelligent monitoring.

Authors:  Guy Bradley-Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Green shoots of recovery: a realist evaluation of a team to support change in general practice.

Authors:  Maggie Bartlett; Ruth Basten; Robert K McKinley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  How can patient experience scores be used to predict quality inspection ratings? A retrospective cross-sectional study of national primary care datasets in the UK.

Authors:  Amy Tallett; Alan J Poots; Chris Graham; Michele Peters; Rory Corbett; Steve Sizmur; Julien Forder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.