Literature DB >> 25733367

Speech performance and training effects in the cochlear implant elderly.

Annette Schumann1, Anne Hast, Ulrich Hoppe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cochlear implantation requires acclimatization to the electrical input. Usually, cochlear implant (CI) listeners undergo an auditory rehabilitation program that includes auditory training sessions. Recently, it was shown that a phoneme-based training may improve speech perception abilities even in experienced CI listeners. The current study focuses on whether the effect of an auditory training program depends on the age of CI listeners.
DESIGN: Fifteen CI listeners took part in an auditory phoneme-based computer training program. Before and after training, speech recognition tests in moderate and difficult noise (+5 dB SNR and 0 dB SNR, respectively) were administered. Additionally, speech recognition was tested 6 months after the training (follow-up). A control group consisting of 12 subjects underwent audiometric testing without any auditory training.
RESULTS: Speech perception in moderate noise improved significantly during the training as revealed by comparing pre- and posttraining scores evaluated in the moderate noise condition. No significant change was observed for the difficult noise situation at 0 dB SNR. The speech perception measures of the control group remained unchanged. No significant effect of age on the training effect was observed.
CONCLUSION: Speech recognition can be improved even in experienced CI listeners. When motivated to participate, senior CI users with long-term CI experience may benefit in a similar way from an auditory, phoneme-based computer training program as younger CI users.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25733367     DOI: 10.1159/000371611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  5 in total

1.  [Phoneme discrimination training with experienced cochlear implant listeners].

Authors:  A Schumann; T Liebscher; U Hoppe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Younger and older adults show non-linear, stimulus-dependent performance during early stages of auditory training for non-native English.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Anna R Tinnemore; Grace Yeni-Komshian; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.482

3.  Using the electrically-evoked compound action potential (ECAP) interphase gap effect to select electrode stimulation sites in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.672

4.  Tablet-Based Telerehabilitation Versus Conventional Face-to-Face Rehabilitation After Cochlear Implantation: Prospective Intervention Pilot Study.

Authors:  Christiane Völter; Carolin Stöckmann; Christiane Schirmer; Stefan Dazert
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2021-03-12

5.  Noise-Induced Change of Cortical Temporal Processing in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Han; Jihyun Lee; Hyo-Jeong Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.372

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.