Literature DB >> 25733362

Neural correlates of auditory-cognitive processing in older adult cochlear implant recipients.

Yael Henkin1, Yifat Yaar-Soffer, Meidan Steinberg, Chava Muchnik.   

Abstract

With the growing number of older adults receiving cochlear implants (CI), there is general agreement that substantial benefits can be gained. Nonetheless, variability in speech perception performance is high, and the relative contribution and interactions among peripheral, central-auditory, and cognitive factors are not fully understood. The goal of the present study was to compare auditory-cognitive processing in older-adult CI recipients with that of older normal-hearing (NH) listeners by means of behavioral and electrophysiologic manifestations of a high-load cognitive task. Auditory event-related potentials (AERPs) were recorded from 9 older postlingually deafened adults with CI (age at CI >60) and 10 age-matched listeners with NH, while performing an auditory Stroop task. Participants were required to classify the speaker's gender (male/female) that produced the words 'mother' or 'father' while ignoring the irrelevant congruent or incongruent word meaning. Older CI and NH listeners exhibited comparable reaction time, performance accuracy, and initial sensory-perceptual processing (i.e. N1 potential). Nonetheless, older CI recipients showed substantially prolonged and less efficient perceptual processing (i.e. P3 potential). Congruency effects manifested in longer reaction time (i.e. Stroop effect), execution time, and P3 latency to incongruent versus congruent stimuli in both groups in a similar fashion; however, markedly prolonged P3 and shortened execution time were evident in older CI recipients. Collectively, older adults (CI and NH) employed a combined perceptual and postperceptual conflict processing strategy; nonetheless, the relative allotment of perceptual resources was substantially enhanced to maintain adequate performance in CI recipients. In sum, the recording of AERPs together with the simultaneously obtained behavioral measures during a Stroop task exposed a differential time course of auditory-cognitive processing in older CI recipients that was not manifested in the behavioral end products of processing. These data may have implications regarding clinical evaluation and rehabilitation procedures that should be tailored specifically for this unique group of patients.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25733362     DOI: 10.1159/000371602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  7 in total

1.  Auditory and audio-visual processing in patients with cochlear, auditory brainstem, and auditory midbrain implants: An EEG study.

Authors:  Irina Schierholz; Mareike Finke; Andrej Kral; Andreas Büchner; Stefan Rach; Thomas Lenarz; Reinhard Dengler; Pascale Sandmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Semantic word integration in children with cochlear implants: Electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Elizabeth Pierotti; Sharon Coffey-Corina; Tristan Schaefer; David P Corina
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  Auditory processing remains sensitive to environmental experience during adolescence in a rodent model.

Authors:  Kelsey L Anbuhl; Justin D Yao; Robert A Hotz; Todd M Mowery; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 17.694

4.  Semantic Processing in Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children: Large N400 Mismatch Effects in Brain Responses, Despite Poor Semantic Ability.

Authors:  Petter Kallioinen; Jonas Olofsson; Cecilia Nakeva von Mentzer; Magnus Lindgren; Marianne Ors; Birgitta S Sahlén; Björn Lyxell; Elisabet Engström; Inger Uhlén
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-08-10

5.  Assessing Cognitive Abilities in High-Performing Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Jake Hillyer; Elizabeth Elkins; Chantel Hazlewood; Stacey D Watson; Julie G Arenberg; Alexandra Parbery-Clark
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Changes in Speech-Related Brain Activity During Adaptation to Electro-Acoustic Hearing.

Authors:  Tobias Balkenhol; Elisabeth Wallhäusser-Franke; Nicole Rotter; Jérôme J Servais
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Noise-Induced Change of Cortical Temporal Processing in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Han; Jihyun Lee; Hyo-Jeong Lee
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.372

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.