Literature DB >> 25733246

Sarilumab Plus Methotrexate in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: Results of a Phase III Study.

Mark C Genovese1, Roy Fleischmann2, Alan J Kivitz3, Maria Rell-Bakalarska4, Renata Martincova5, Stefano Fiore6, Patricia Rohane6, Hubert van Hoogstraten6, Anju Garg6, Chunpeng Fan6, Janet van Adelsberg7, Steven P Weinstein7, Neil M H Graham7, Neil Stahl7, George D Yancopoulos7, Tom W J Huizinga8, Désirée van der Heijde8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sarilumab in combination with methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
METHODS: Adults with moderate-to-severe RA and an inadequate response to MTX were randomized (1:1:1) to receive sarilumab (doses of 150 mg or 200 mg) or placebo every 2 weeks in conjunction with weekly MTX for 52 weeks. Co-primary end points were the proportion of patients achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) improvement responses at week 24, change from baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index (DI) at week 16, and change from baseline in the modified Sharp/van der Heijde score (SHS) of radiographic damage at week 52.
RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar among the groups. For all 3 co-primary end points, the sarilumab 150 mg and 200 mg groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements as compared with the placebo group (ACR20 response rate at week 24, 58.0%, 66.4%, and 33.4%, respectively [P < 0.0001]; least squares mean change in HAQ DI at week 16, -0.53, -0.55, and -0.29, respectively [P < 0.0001]; and mean change in SHS at week 52, 0.90, 0.25, and 2.78, respectively [P < 0.0001]). The most common treatment-emergent adverse event was infection. In the sarilumab 150 mg, sarilumab 200 mg, and placebo groups, the incidence of serious infections was 2.6%, 4.0%, and 2.3%, respectively. Elevations in alanine aminotransferase levels >3-fold the upper limit of normal occurred in 9.5%, 8.0%, and 2.1% of patients, respectively; in 24 patients, this led to discontinuation of treatment. Elevated total cholesterol levels were observed in 36.8%, 43.0%, and 18.3% of patients, respectively. In patients receiving 150 mg and 200 mg sarilumab, neutrophil counts of 0.5 to <1.0 × 10(9) /liter were observed in 5.1% and 7.8% of patients, respectively, while neutrophil counts of <0.5 × 10(9) /liter were observed in 0.9% and 0.7% of patients, respectively; none of the patients receiving placebo experienced changes in neutrophil counts.
CONCLUSION: In RA patients treated with sarilumab (150 mg or 200 mg every 2 weeks) in combination with MTX, both doses provided sustained clinical efficacy, as shown by significant improvements in symptomatic, functional, and radiographic outcomes. Sarilumab was generally well tolerated. The adverse events observed in this study were consistent with the effects of interleukin-6 signaling blockade.
© 2015 sanofi-aventis U.S. LLC. Arthritis & Rheumatology is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25733246     DOI: 10.1002/art.39093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheumatol        ISSN: 2326-5191            Impact factor:   10.995


  84 in total

1.  Antibodies to watch in 2016.

Authors:  Janice M Reichert
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of tocilizumab, sarilumab, and sirukumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Sang-Cheol Bae; Young Ho Lee
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Sarilumab for Previously-Treated Moderate or Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.

Authors:  Iñigo Bermejo; Shijie Ren; Emma Simpson; Mark Clowes; David L Scott; Adam Young; Matt Stevenson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Rheumatoid arthritis: IL-6 inhibition in RA--déjà vu all over again?

Authors:  Eric M Ruderman
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 5.  [New drugs for treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis].

Authors:  Gerd Horneff
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.372

6.  Association of Interleukin 6 Receptor Variant With Cardiovascular Disease Effects of Interleukin 6 Receptor Blocking Therapy: A Phenome-Wide Association Study.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Yichi Zhang; Yuk-Lam Ho; Nicholas Link; Jiehuan Sun; Jie Huang; Tianrun A Cai; Scott Damrauer; Yuri Ahuja; Jacqueline Honerlaw; Jie Huang; Lauren Costa; Petra Schubert; Chuan Hong; David Gagnon; Yan V Sun; J Michael Gaziano; Peter Wilson; Kelly Cho; Philip Tsao; Christopher J O'Donnell; Katherine P Liao
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 14.676

7.  Usability and Patient Preference Phase 3 Study of the Sarilumab Pen in Patients with Active Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Alan Kivitz; Lydie Baret-Cormel; Hubert van Hoogstraten; Sheldon Wang; Janie Parrino; Christine Xu; Marina Stanislav
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2017-12-05

Review 8.  Selected cytokine pathways in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Mélissa Noack; Pierre Miossec
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 9.623

Review 9.  [Biologicals and small molecules for rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  Stephan Blüml
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 10.  Room for more IL-6 blockade? Sarilumab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Rayford R June; Nancy J Olsen
Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.