| Literature DB >> 25733020 |
Francesco Silvio Pasqualini1, Sean Paul Sheehy1, Ashutosh Agarwal1, Yvonne Aratyn-Schaus1, Kevin Kit Parker2.
Abstract
Structural phenotyping based on classical image feature detection has been adopted to elucidate the molecular mechanisms behind genetically or pharmacologically induced changes in cell morphology. Here, we developed a set of 11 metrics to capture the increasing sarcomere organization that occurs intracellularly during striated muscle cell development. To test our metrics, we analyzed the localization of the contractile protein α-actinin in a variety of primary and stem-cell derived cardiomyocytes. Further, we combined these metrics with data mining algorithms to unbiasedly score the phenotypic maturity of human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25733020 PMCID: PMC4375945 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2015.01.020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Reports ISSN: 2213-6711 Impact factor: 7.765
List of Metrics of Sarcomere Organization Developed, Integrated, or Updated for This Study
| Metric Number | Metric Name | Metric Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | sarcomere length (SL) | The average distance between Z-disks in the entire field of view. |
| 2 | total energy | The total amount of spatially varying immunosignal. |
| 3 | sarcomeric energy | The amount of immunosignal with a spatial periodicity given by SL. |
| 4 | sarcomeric packing density (SPD) | The fraction of immunosignal that localized in a regular lattice at a distance SL. |
| 5 | orientational order parameter (OOP) | The degree of alignment of all foreground elements in the field of view. |
| 6 | sarcomeric OOP (OOP1) | The degree of alignment of foreground elements that are oriented orthogonally to the actin bundles (Z-disks). |
| 7 | nonsarcomeric OOP (OOP2) | The degree of alignment of foreground elements that are oriented parallel to the actin bundles (Z-bodies). |
| 8 | Z-disks relative presence (γ) | The fraction of foreground elements that are recognized as Z-bodies. |
| 9 | weighted OOP | Calculated by multiplying the sarcomeric OOP (OOP1) and the weight γ. In this sense, it represents both the abundance and relative alignment of the Z-disks in the imag. |
| 10 | coverage quality control | Calculated as the percentage of the image pixels that have an intensity value higher than user-specified threshold. It estimates the α-actinin coverage. |
| 11 | coherency quality control | Calculated as the percentage of α-actinin-positive pixels that have a value of the coherency higher than a user-selected threshold. It is useful for artifact removal and for image quality control. |
See Figure S1 for a schematic representation of the role of each parameter.
Figure 1Metrics of Contractile Architecture to Characterize the Progression of Myofibrillogenesis
(A) Schematic representation of a sarcomere (i) and of the distribution of α-actinin (red) during myofibrillogenesis: in the cytoplasm (ii), along the actin (green) filament in the form of Z-bodies (iii), and incorporated into the Z-disks (iv).
(B) Algorithmic detection of the orientation and periodic registration of α-actinin-positive structures using the image spatial (coordinates x,y) and Fourier (coordinates u,v) domains.
(C) Color-coded orientations (i, from the inset of synthetic image Figure 1Bii) displayed into a histogram (ii) can be fitted to identify orientations belonging to Z-disks (red) and Z-bodies (black). In parallel, the 2D Fourier power spectrum (iii) was integrated into a 1D curve (iv) and fitted to identify the contribution of periodically spaced Z-disks (red) and aperiodic Z-bodies (black).
(D) α-actinin immunostains (white) of mononucleated (DAPI, blue) murine primary (mpCM, i) and murine (miCM, ii) or human (hiCM, iii) induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. The color-coded representation of the α-actinin orientation in the inset is reported below the image. The positive semiplane for the Fourier transform is reported on the right of each image.
Scale bar represent 20 μm. See also Figures S2 and S3.
Figure 2Structural Phenotyping of Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes
(A) α-actinin (white) and chromatin (blue) images of rpCMs at 6 (i), 24 (ii), and 48 hr (iii) as well as hiCMs at 72 hr (iv) after seeding with color-coded orientations and Fourier representations. Scale bar represents 25 μm.
(B) Scatter plot showing how our metrics of myofibrillar architecture quantitatively captured the progression of myofibrillogenesis in rpCM tissues from differentiated (6 hr, brown squares) to immature (24 hr, red circles) and finally mature (48 hr, green triangles) myocytes. In contrast, the hiCM tissues (orange diamonds) exhibited a relatively immature myofibrillar organization.
(C) A dataset comprising ∼120 sarcomeric α-actinin images per conditions (insets in Ai–Aiv) was acquired, and the features extracted from this dataset were utilized to train several classifiers to distinguish the classes of differentiated (D), immature (I), and mature (M) myocytes. The classifiers assigned only ∼29% of the 118 hiCM images to the class of myocytes with a mature structural phenotype, with the rest showing differentiated or immature contractile architectures.
Results are shown as mean ± SEM. See also Figure S4.
Machine Learning Algorithms Adopted for the Analysis of the Myofibrillogenesis Dataset
| Classifier Number | Classifier Name | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | naive Bayes | One of the simplest classifiers, based on intuitive probability models, and it is computationally very treatable. | It simplistically assumes that all the features are statistically independent, which may not be true for sarcomeres whose structure, during myofibrillogenesis, becomes more periodic and well-aligned. |
| 2 | neural network (NN) | A popular machine learning algorithm for structural phenotyping. Extensive literature shows how a NN classifier can always be constructed, providing that one has a good enough dataset. | The data model is not intuitive. The neural network optimization is not trivial and requires considerations for the dataset size as well as the stochastic initialization. |
| 3 | tree bagging | A popular machine-learning algorithm for structural phenotyping. The data model is more intuitive than NN. | Optimization of the tree bagging algorithm is not trivial and requires careful consideration of the sample and tree sizes. |
See Figure S4.