Literature DB >> 25732496

Use of intelligent assignment to Medicare Part D plans for people with schizophrenia could produce substantial savings.

Yuting Zhang1, Seo Hyon Baik2, Joseph P Newhouse3.   

Abstract

Medicare insures about half of the people in the United States diagnosed with schizophrenia. More than 90 percent of these beneficiaries are eligible for a low-income subsidy for their Part D prescription drug benefit, and the great majority of them are randomly assigned to a stand-alone drug plan. We simulated savings from replacing random assignment with an "intelligent assignment" algorithm that would assign beneficiaries to the least expensive plan in 2010 based on their drug usage in the previous year. Doing so generated projected annual drug savings of $379 per dual-eligible (those enrolled in both Medicaid and Medicare) beneficiary with a low-income subsidy; $404 per non-dual eligible with the subsidy; and $604 per beneficiary for those without the subsidy who chose their own plans. This translates into savings of $466 per beneficiary with schizophrenia. Intelligent assignment could have saved about $150 million for Medicare and beneficiaries with schizophrenia combined in 2010. We recommend that Medicare use intelligent assignment as the default approach for all beneficiaries with schizophrenia who receive a low-income subsidy, and consider it as an option for all Part D beneficiaries, regardless of their income. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare; Pharmaceuticals

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25732496      PMCID: PMC4349210          DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  7 in total

1.  Effect of Part D coverage restrictions for antidepressants, antipsychotics, and cholinesterase inhibitors on related nursing home resident outcomes.

Authors:  David G Stevenson; A James O'Malley; Stacie B Dusetzina; Susan L Mitchell; Barbara J Zarowitz; Michael E Chernew; Joseph P Newhouse; Haiden A Huskamp
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Choice Inconsistencies Among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D Program.

Authors:  Jason Abaluck; Jonathan Gruber
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  2011-06-01

3.  Complex Medicare advantage choices may overwhelm seniors--especially those with impaired decision making.

Authors:  J Michael McWilliams; Christopher C Afendulis; Thomas G McGuire; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Comparison friction: experimental evidence from medicare drug plans.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Kling; Sendhil Mullainathan; Eldar Shafir; Lee C Vermeulen; Marian V Wrobel
Journal:  Q J Econ       Date:  2012

5.  The vast majority of Medicare Part D beneficiaries still don't choose the cheapest plans that meet their medication needs.

Authors:  Chao Zhou; Yuting Zhang
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  A simple change to the Medicare Part D low-income subsidy program could save $5 billion.

Authors:  Yuting Zhang; Chao Zhou; Seo Hyon Baik
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Plan selection in Medicare Part D: evidence from administrative data.

Authors:  Florian Heiss; Adam Leive; Daniel McFadden; Joachim Winter
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.883

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Do Medicare Beneficiaries Living With HIV/AIDS Choose Prescription Drug Plans That Minimize Their Total Spending?

Authors:  Katherine A Desmond; Thomas H Rice; Arleen A Leibowitz
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.099

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.