DESCRIPTION: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations based on the comparative effectiveness of risk assessment scales and preventive interventions for pressure ulcers. METHODS: This guideline is based on published literature on this topic that was identified by using MEDLINE (1946 through February 2014), CINAHL (1998 through February 2014), the Cochrane Library, clinical trials registries, and reference lists. Searches were limited to English-language publications. The outcomes evaluated for this guideline include pressure ulcer incidence and severity, resource use, diagnostic accuracy, measures of risk, and harms. This guideline grades the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations by using ACP's clinical practice guidelines grading system. The target audience for this guideline includes all clinicians, and the target patient population is patients at risk for pressure ulcers. RECOMMENDATION 1: ACP recommends that clinicians should perform a risk assessment to identify patients who are at risk of developing pressure ulcers. (Grade: weak recommendation, low-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 2: ACP recommends that clinicians should choose advanced static mattresses or advanced static overlays in patients who are at an increased risk of developing pressure ulcers. (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 3: ACP recommends against using alternating-air mattresses or alternating-air overlays in patients who are at an increased risk of developing pressure ulcers. (Grade: weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).
DESCRIPTION: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations based on the comparative effectiveness of risk assessment scales and preventive interventions for pressure ulcers. METHODS: This guideline is based on published literature on this topic that was identified by using MEDLINE (1946 through February 2014), CINAHL (1998 through February 2014), the Cochrane Library, clinical trials registries, and reference lists. Searches were limited to English-language publications. The outcomes evaluated for this guideline include pressure ulcer incidence and severity, resource use, diagnostic accuracy, measures of risk, and harms. This guideline grades the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations by using ACP's clinical practice guidelines grading system. The target audience for this guideline includes all clinicians, and the target patient population is patients at risk for pressure ulcers. RECOMMENDATION 1: ACP recommends that clinicians should perform a risk assessment to identify patients who are at risk of developing pressure ulcers. (Grade: weak recommendation, low-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 2: ACP recommends that clinicians should choose advanced static mattresses or advanced static overlays in patients who are at an increased risk of developing pressure ulcers. (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). RECOMMENDATION 3: ACP recommends against using alternating-air mattresses or alternating-air overlays in patients who are at an increased risk of developing pressure ulcers. (Grade: weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).
Authors: Abbas Al Mutair; Zainab Ambani; Fadillah Al Obaidan; Khulud Al Salman; Hashmiah Alhassan; Alya Al Mutairi Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Jan Kottner; Elisabeth Hahnel; Andrea Lichterfeld-Kottner; Ulrike Blume-Peytavi; Andreas Büscher Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Joanna Bukowska; Andrea Alarcon Uquillas; Xiying Wu; Trivia Frazier; Katarzyna Walendzik; Mikaela Vanek; Dina Gaupp; Bruce A Bunnell; Paul Kosnik; Babak Mehrara; Adam J Katz; Barbara Gawronska-Kozak; Jeffrey M Gimble Journal: Stem Cells Dev Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 3.272
Authors: Joanna Bukowska; Andrea Alarcon Uquillas; Xiying Wu; Trivia Frazier; Katarzyna Walendzik; Mikaela Vanek; Dina Gaupp; Bruce A Bunnell; Paul Kosnik; Babak Mehrara; Adam J Katz; Barbara Gawronska-Kozak; Jeffrey M Gimble Journal: Stem Cells Dev Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 3.272
Authors: William V Padula; Robert D Gibbons; Peter J Pronovost; Donald Hedeker; Manish K Mishra; Mary Beth F Makic; John Fp Bridges; Heidi L Wald; Robert J Valuck; Adam J Ginensky; Anthony Ursitti; Laura Ruth Venable; Ziv Epstein; David O Meltzer Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Wrechelle Ocampo; Amanda Cheung; Barry Baylis; Nancy Clayden; John M Conly; William A Ghali; Chester H Ho; Jaime Kaufman; Henry T Stelfox; David B Hogan Journal: Adv Skin Wound Care Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.347
Authors: Cecilia Inés Loudet; María Cecilia Marchena; María Roxana Maradeo; Silvia Laura Fernández; María Victoria Romero; Graciela Esther Valenzuela; Isabel Eustaquia Herrera; Martha Teresa Ramírez; Silvia Rojas Palomino; Mariana Virginia Teberobsky; Leandro Ismael Tumino; Ana Laura González; Rosa Reina; Elisa Estenssoro Journal: Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Date: 2017 Jan-Mar