Literature DB >> 25732277

Relationships between Medicare Advantage contract characteristics and quality-of-care ratings: an observational analysis of Medicare Advantage star ratings.

Peng Xu, James F Burgess, Howard Cabral, Rene Soria-Saucedo, Lewis E Kazis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) publishes star ratings on Medicare Advantage (MA) contracts to measure plan quality of care with implications for reimbursement and bonuses.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether MA contract characteristics are associated with quality of care through the Medicare plan star ratings.
DESIGN: Retrospective study of MA star ratings in 2010. Unadjusted and adjusted multivariable linear regression models assessed the relationship between 5-star rating summary scores and plan characteristics.
SETTING: CMS MA contracts nationally. PARTICIPANTS: 409 (71%) of a total of 575 MA contracts, covering 10.56 million Medicare beneficiaries (90% of the MA population) in the United States in 2010. MEASUREMENTS: The MA quality ratings summary score (stars range from 1 to 5) is a quality measure based on 36 indicators related to processes of care, health outcomes, access to care, and beneficiary satisfaction.
RESULTS: Nonprofit, larger, and older MA contracts were more likely to receive higher star ratings. Star ratings ranged from 2 to 5. Nonprofit contracts received an average 0.55 (95% CI, 0.42 to 0.67) higher star ratings than for-profit contracts (P  < 0.001) after controls were set for contract characteristics. LIMITATION: The study focused on persons aged 65 years or older covered by MA.
CONCLUSION: In 2010, nonprofit MA contracts received significantly higher star ratings than for-profit contracts. When comparing health plans in the future, the CMS should give increasing attention to for-profit plans with lower quality ratings and consider developing programs to assist newer and smaller plans in improving their care for Medicare beneficiaries. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25732277     DOI: 10.7326/M14-0332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  5 in total

1.  The Roles of Cost and Quality Information in Medicare Advantage Plan Enrollment Decisions: an Observational Study.

Authors:  Rachel O Reid; Partha Deb; Benjamin L Howell; Patrick H Conway; William H Shrank
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The impact of the affordable care Act (ACA) on favorable risk selection and Beneficiaries' health status in Medicare advantage: a preliminary assessment.

Authors:  Nabil Natafgi; Matthew Nattinger; Patience Ugwi; Fred Ullrich; Fredric D Wolinsky
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  The Role of Geography in the Assessment of Quality: Evidence from the Medicare Advantage Program.

Authors:  Rene Soria-Saucedo; Peng Xu; Jack Newsom; Howard Cabral; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  What's Driving High Disenrollment in Medicare Advantage?

Authors:  Eva DuGoff; Sandra Chao
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  Impact of Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plan Star Ratings on Enrollment before and after Implementation of Quality-Related Bonus Payments in 2012.

Authors:  Pengxiang Li; Jalpa A Doshi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.