Pihla Kuusela1, Bo Jacobsson1,2, Mona Söderlund1, Carina Bejlum3, Elisabeth Almström3, Lars Ladfors1, Henrik Hagberg1,4, Ulla-Britt Wennerholm1. 1. Institute for Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 2. Division of Epidemiology, Department of Genes and Environment, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. 3. Norra Älvsborg County Hospital, Trollhättan, Sweden. 4. Centre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cervical length in asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancies in the second trimester by means of transvaginal ultrasonography, and to examine the relation between cervical length and spontaneous preterm delivery. DESIGN: Observational, prospective study. SETTING: A university hospital and a county hospital in Western Sweden. POPULATION: A total of 2122 asymptomatic women with live singleton pregnancies without fetal anomalies. METHODS: Cervical length was measured at between 16 and 23 weeks of gestation by means of transvaginal ultrasonography. Data were analysed using logistic regression analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cervical length in relation to spontaneous preterm delivery <34 weeks (primary outcome) and <37 weeks of gestation (secondary outcome). RESULTS: Eleven women had a cervical length of ≤25 mm (0.5%) and 73 women had a cervical length of ≤30 mm (3.4%). Spontaneous preterm delivery at <34 weeks occurred in 22/2061 women (1.1%) and at <37 weeks in 87/2061 women (4.2%). There was a significant association between cervical length and spontaneous preterm delivery at <34 weeks (odds ratio 1.78; 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.65 for a decrease of cervical length by 5 mm) but no significant association at <37 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of short cervical length of ≤25 mm was lower than expected. The study confirmed the increased risk of spontaneous preterm delivery in women with a short cervix, although the analysis was based on only a few cases. In Sweden, a larger study is needed to evaluate the prevalence of short cervical length and the possible association with preterm delivery before universal screening can be recommended.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cervical length in asymptomatic women with singleton pregnancies in the second trimester by means of transvaginal ultrasonography, and to examine the relation between cervical length and spontaneous preterm delivery. DESIGN: Observational, prospective study. SETTING: A university hospital and a county hospital in Western Sweden. POPULATION: A total of 2122 asymptomatic women with live singleton pregnancies without fetal anomalies. METHODS: Cervical length was measured at between 16 and 23 weeks of gestation by means of transvaginal ultrasonography. Data were analysed using logistic regression analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cervical length in relation to spontaneous preterm delivery <34 weeks (primary outcome) and <37 weeks of gestation (secondary outcome). RESULTS: Eleven women had a cervical length of ≤25 mm (0.5%) and 73 women had a cervical length of ≤30 mm (3.4%). Spontaneous preterm delivery at <34 weeks occurred in 22/2061 women (1.1%) and at <37 weeks in 87/2061 women (4.2%). There was a significant association between cervical length and spontaneous preterm delivery at <34 weeks (odds ratio 1.78; 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.65 for a decrease of cervical length by 5 mm) but no significant association at <37 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of short cervical length of ≤25 mm was lower than expected. The study confirmed the increased risk of spontaneous preterm delivery in women with a short cervix, although the analysis was based on only a few cases. In Sweden, a larger study is needed to evaluate the prevalence of short cervical length and the possible association with preterm delivery before universal screening can be recommended.
Authors: Xavier P Burgos-Artizzu; Nuria Baños; David Coronado-Gutiérrez; Julia Ponce; Brenda Valenzuela-Alcaraz; Ana L Moreno-Espinosa; Laia Grau; Álvaro Perez-Moreno; Eduard Gratacós; Montse Palacio Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Soo Hyun Cho; Kyo Hoon Park; Eun Young Jung; Jung Kyung Joo; Ji Ae Jang; Ha Na Yoo Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Panagiotis Tsikouras; George Anastasopoulos; Vasileios Maroulis; Anastasia Bothou; Anna Chalkidou; Dorelia Deuteraiou; Xanthoula Anthoulaki; Georgios Tsatsaris; Arzou Halil Bourazan; George Iatrakis; Stefanos Zervoudis; Georgios Galazios; Lola-Katerina Inagamova; Roland Csorba; Alexander-Tobias Teichmann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-04-18 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: T G Bortoletto; T V Silva; A Borovac-Pinheiro; C M Pereira; A D Silva; M S França; A R Hatanaka; J P Argenton; R Passini; B W Mol; J G Cecatti; R C Pacagnella Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yu Mi Kim; Kyo Hoon Park; Hyunsoo Park; Ha-Na Yoo; Song Yi Kook; Se Jeong Jeon Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 2.153