Literature DB >> 25731998

Improving reliability of subject-level resting-state fMRI parcellation with shrinkage estimators.

Amanda F Mejia1, Mary Beth Nebel2, Haochang Shou3, Ciprian M Crainiceanu1, James J Pekar4, Stewart Mostofsky5, Brian Caffo1, Martin A Lindquist6.   

Abstract

A recent interest in resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) lies in subdividing the human brain into anatomically and functionally distinct regions of interest. For example, brain parcellation is often a necessary step for defining the network nodes used in connectivity studies. While inference has traditionally been performed on group-level data, there is a growing interest in parcellating single subject data. However, this is difficult due to the inherent low signal-to-noise ratio of rsfMRI data, combined with typically short scan lengths. A large number of brain parcellation approaches employ clustering, which begins with a measure of similarity or distance between voxels. The goal of this work is to improve the reproducibility of single-subject parcellation using shrinkage-based estimators of such measures, allowing the noisy subject-specific estimator to "borrow strength" in a principled manner from a larger population of subjects. We present several empirical Bayes shrinkage estimators and outline methods for shrinkage when multiple scans are not available for each subject. We perform shrinkage on raw inter-voxel correlation estimates and use both raw and shrinkage estimates to produce parcellations by performing clustering on the voxels. While we employ a standard spectral clustering approach, our proposed method is agnostic to the choice of clustering method and can be used as a pre-processing step for any clustering algorithm. Using two datasets - a simulated dataset where the true parcellation is known and is subject-specific and a test-retest dataset consisting of two 7-minute resting-state fMRI scans from 20 subjects - we show that parcellations produced from shrinkage correlation estimates have higher reliability and validity than those produced from raw correlation estimates. Application to test-retest data shows that using shrinkage estimators increases the reproducibility of subject-specific parcellations of the motor cortex by up to 30%.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25731998      PMCID: PMC4408254          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  28 in total

1.  Hierarchical clustering to measure connectivity in fMRI resting-state data.

Authors:  Dietmar Cordes; Vic Haughton; John D Carew; Konstantinos Arfanakis; Ken Maravilla
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Correlations and Multiple Comparisons in Functional Imaging: A Statistical Perspective (Commentary on Vul et al., 2009).

Authors:  Martin A Lindquist; Andrew Gelman
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05

3.  Dealing with the shortcomings of spatial normalization: multi-subject parcellation of fMRI datasets.

Authors:  Bertrand Thirion; Guillaume Flandin; Philippe Pinel; Alexis Roche; Philippe Ciuciu; Jean-Baptiste Poline
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Multi-parametric neuroimaging reproducibility: a 3-T resource study.

Authors:  Bennett A Landman; Alan J Huang; Aliya Gifford; Deepti S Vikram; Issel Anne L Lim; Jonathan A D Farrell; John A Bogovic; Jun Hua; Min Chen; Samson Jarso; Seth A Smith; Suresh Joel; Susumu Mori; James J Pekar; Peter B Barker; Jerry L Prince; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI.

Authors:  Yashar Behzadi; Khaled Restom; Joy Liau; Thomas T Liu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Defining functional areas in individual human brains using resting functional connectivity MRI.

Authors:  Alexander L Cohen; Damien A Fair; Nico U F Dosenbach; Francis M Miezin; Donna Dierker; David C Van Essen; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Multi-level bootstrap analysis of stable clusters in resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  Pierre Bellec; Pedro Rosa-Neto; Oliver C Lyttelton; Habib Benali; Alan C Evans
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Parcellating an individual subject's cortical and subcortical brain structures using snowball sampling of resting-state correlations.

Authors:  Gagan S Wig; Timothy O Laumann; Alexander L Cohen; Jonathan D Power; Steven M Nelson; Matthew F Glasser; Francis M Miezin; Abraham Z Snyder; Bradley L Schlaggar; Steven E Petersen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  A parcellation scheme based on von Mises-Fisher distributions and Markov random fields for segmenting brain regions using resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  Srikanth Ryali; Tianwen Chen; Kaustubh Supekar; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Spatially constrained hierarchical parcellation of the brain with resting-state fMRI.

Authors:  Thomas Blumensath; Saad Jbabdi; Matthew F Glasser; David C Van Essen; Kamil Ugurbil; Timothy E J Behrens; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  18 in total

1.  Parcellation of the human hippocampus based on gray matter volume covariance: Replicable results on healthy young adults.

Authors:  Ruiyang Ge; Paul Kot; Xiang Liu; Donna J Lang; Jane Z Wang; William G Honer; Fidel Vila-Rodriguez
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The open diffusion data derivatives, brain data upcycling via integrated publishing of derivatives and reproducible open cloud services.

Authors:  Paolo Avesani; Brent McPherson; Soichi Hayashi; Cesar F Caiafa; Robert Henschel; Eleftherios Garyfallidis; Lindsey Kitchell; Daniel Bullock; Andrew Patterson; Emanuele Olivetti; Olaf Sporns; Andrew J Saykin; Lei Wang; Ivo Dinov; David Hancock; Bradley Caron; Yiming Qian; Franco Pestilli
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 6.444

3.  Predicting individual brain functional connectivity using a Bayesian hierarchical model.

Authors:  Tian Dai; Ying Guo
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Improved estimation of subject-level functional connectivity using full and partial correlation with empirical Bayes shrinkage.

Authors:  Amanda F Mejia; Mary Beth Nebel; Anita D Barber; Ann S Choe; James J Pekar; Brian S Caffo; Martin A Lindquist
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Statistical estimation of T1 relaxation times using conventional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Amanda F Mejia; Elizabeth M Sweeney; Blake Dewey; Govind Nair; Pascal Sati; Colin Shea; Daniel S Reich; Russell T Shinohara
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Group-regularized individual prediction: theory and application to pain.

Authors:  Martin A Lindquist; Anjali Krishnan; Marina López-Solà; Marieke Jepma; Choong-Wan Woo; Leonie Koban; Mathieu Roy; Lauren Y Atlas; Liane Schmidt; Luke J Chang; Elizabeth A Reynolds Losin; Hedwig Eisenbarth; Yoni K Ashar; Elizabeth Delk; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Individual-Specific Areal-Level Parcellations Improve Functional Connectivity Prediction of Behavior.

Authors:  Ru Kong; Qing Yang; Evan Gordon; Aihuiping Xue; Xiaoxuan Yan; Csaba Orban; Xi-Nian Zuo; Nathan Spreng; Tian Ge; Avram Holmes; Simon Eickhoff; B T Thomas Yeo
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Amygdala hyperconnectivity in the paranoid state: A transdiagnostic study.

Authors:  Linlin Fan; Hans Klein; Emily Bass; Cassi Springfield; Amy Pinkham
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.250

9.  A guide to the measurement and interpretation of fMRI test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Stephanie Noble; Dustin Scheinost; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2021-01-20

10.  A decade of test-retest reliability of functional connectivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie Noble; Dustin Scheinost; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 7.400

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.