Literature DB >> 25731731

CEA serum level as early predictive marker of outcome during EGFR-TKI therapy in advanced NSCLC patients.

Francesco Facchinetti1, Raffaella Aldigeri, Rosalia Aloe, Beatrice Bortesi, Andrea Ardizzoni, Marcello Tiseo.   

Abstract

Considering the role of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) serum levels as potential useful predictive marker during chemotherapy treatment, we studied its applicability in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Our retrospective cohort consists of 79 patients (33 EGFR mutated and 46 EGFR wild type or unknown) affected by advanced NSCLC, for whom CEA serum values at the beginning of TKI therapy and after the first month of treatment were available, regardless of treatment line. Baseline CEA value, percentage of CEA reduction after 1 month, and percentage of patients with ≥20 % CEA decrease after 1 month (CEA response) were correlated with disease control rate (DCR), progression-free (PFS), and overall (OS) survival, according to EGFR mutational status. Median baseline CEA levels were significantly higher in EGFR mutated (40.9 ng/ml; interquartile range (IQR) 8.9-197.6) than in wild-type cases (6.2 ng/ml; IQR 2.8-12.8; p = 0.003). Both percentage reduction in CEA levels (-10.7 vs. +13.4 %) and percentage of cases with CEA response (42 vs. 20 %) were significantly higher in mutated vs. wild-type/unknown patients (p = 0.007 and p = 0.027, respectively). In wild-type/unknown patients, CEA response was significantly correlated with DCR (p = 0.001) and resulted as a significant predictor of PFS both in univariate (p = 0.002) and in multivariate analyses (hazard ratio (HR) 0.27; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.11-0.66; p = 0.004); only a trend was found for OS prediction (p = 0.082). In EGFR-mutated group, CEA reduction did not show any correlation either with PFS or OS. CEA response after 1 month of EGFR-TKI therapy could be a useful marker, worthy to further studies, as early predictor of treatment outcome in EGFR wild-type/unknown unselected NSCLC cases for which no molecular predictor is yet available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25731731     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-3269-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  28 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Prognostic and predictive value of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 levels in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib.

Authors:  Minkyu Jung; Se Hyun Kim; Young Joo Lee; Soojung Hong; Young Ae Kang; Se Kyu Kim; Joon Chang; Sun Young Rha; Joo Hang Kim; Dae Joon Kim; Byoung Chul Cho
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Comparison of standard and CA-125 response criteria in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with platinum or paclitaxel.

Authors:  J A Bridgewater; A E Nelstrop; G J Rustin; M E Gore; W P McGuire; W J Hoskins
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Serum carcinoembryonic antigen as a predictive marker for sensitivity to gefitinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Tatsuro Okamoto; Tomomi Nakamura; Jiro Ikeda; Riichiroh Maruyama; Fumihiro Shoji; Tetsuro Miyake; Hiroshi Wataya; Yukito Ichinose
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Predictive and prognostic value of early response assessment using 18FDG-PET in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with erlotinib.

Authors:  Marcello Tiseo; Massimo Ippolito; Maura Scarlattei; Pietro Spadaro; Sebastiano Cosentino; Fiorenza Latteri; Livia Ruffini; Marco Bartolotti; Beatrice Bortesi; Claudia Fumarola; Cristina Caffarra; Andrea Cavazzoni; Roberta R Alfieri; Pier Giorgio Petronini; Roberto Bordonaro; Paolo Bruzzi; Andrea Ardizzoni; Hector J Soto Parra
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 6.  Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer.

Authors:  M Grunnet; J B Sorensen
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 5.705

7.  Serum CYFRA 21-1 in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer: an early measure of response.

Authors:  Robin T Vollmer; Ramaswamy Govindan; Stephen L Graziano; Gary Gamble; Jennifer Garst; Michael J Kelley; Robert H Christenson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Cytokeratin 19 fragment predicts the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor in non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation.

Authors:  Kosuke Tanaka; Akito Hata; Reiko Kaji; Shiro Fujita; Takehiro Otoshi; Daichi Fujimoto; Takahisa Kawamura; Koji Tamai; Jumpei Takeshita; Takeshi Matsumoto; Kazuya Monden; Kazuma Nagata; Kyoko Otsuka; Atsushi Nakagawa; Ryo Tachikawa; Kojiro Otsuka; Keisuke Tomii; Nobuyuki Katakami
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  Serum tumor markers as predictors for survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib.

Authors:  Chao-Hua Chiu; Yu-Ning Shih; Chun-Ming Tsai; Jia-Ling Liou; Yuh-Min Chen; Reury-Perng Perng
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 5.705

10.  CYFRA 21-1 is a prognostic determinant in non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a meta-analysis in 2063 patients.

Authors:  J-L Pujol; O Molinier; W Ebert; J-P Daurès; F Barlesi; G Buccheri; M Paesmans; E Quoix; D Moro-Sibilot; M Szturmowicz; J-M Bréchot; T Muley; J Grenier
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  10 in total

1.  Factors that predict progression-free survival in Chinese lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Shaohua Cui; Liwen Xiong; Yuqing Lou; Huangping Shi; Aiqin Gu; Yizhuo Zhao; Tianqing Chu; Huimin Wang; Wei Zhang; Lili Dong; Liyan Jiang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Clinical significance of joint detection of serum CEA, SCCA, and bFGF in the diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Haixiang Yu; Zhifeng Han; Nan Gao; Jinru Xue; Yan Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-08-01

3.  Enhanced antitumor effect of combining TRAIL and MnSOD mediated by CEA-controlled oncolytic adenovirus in lung cancer.

Authors:  R Zhang; X Zhang; B Ma; B Xiao; F Huang; P Huang; C Ying; T Liu; Y Wang
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 5.987

4.  Validity of using immunohistochemistry to predict treatment outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer not otherwise specified.

Authors:  Takahiro Ota; Keisuke Kirita; Reiko Matsuzawa; Hibiki Udagawa; Shingo Matsumoto; Kiyotaka Yoh; Seiji Niho; Genichiro Ishii; Koichi Goto
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Baseline and Trend of Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio as Prognostic Factors in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Yu-Mu Chen; Chien-Hao Lai; Huang-Chih Chang; Tung-Ying Chao; Chia-Cheng Tseng; Wen-Feng Fang; Chin-Chou Wang; Yu-Hsiu Chung; Yi-Hsi Wang; Mao-Chang Su; Kuo-Tung Huang; Hung-Chen Chen; Ya-Chun Chang; Meng-Chih Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations and Their Prognostic Value with Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Pathological T1 Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Wang-Yu Zhu; Hai-Feng Li; Ke-Xin Fang; Bing-Jie Zhang; Shi-Quan Zhou; Yong-Kui Zhang; Han-Bo Le; Xiao-Fei Hu
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.434

7.  Specific driving of the suicide E gene by the CEA promoter enhances the effects of paclitaxel in lung cancer.

Authors:  Ana Rosa Rama Ballesteros; Rosa Hernández; Gloria Perazzoli; Laura Cabeza; Consolación Melguizo; Celia Vélez; Jose Prados
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 5.987

8.  Baseline, Trend, and Normalization of Carcinoembryonic Antigen as Prognostic Factors in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.

Authors:  Yu-Mu Chen; Chien-Hao Lai; Huang-Chih Chang; Tung-Ying Chao; Chia-Cheng Tseng; Wen-Feng Fang; Chin-Chou Wang; Yu-Hsiu Chung; Kuo-Tung Huang; Hung-Cheng Chen; Ya-Chun Chang; Meng-Chih Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Predictive and prognostic value of preoperative serum tumor markers is EGFR mutation-specific in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Richeng Jiang; Xinyue Wang; Kai Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-03

10.  Serum SP70 is a sensitive predictor of chemotherapy response in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jingping Liu; Wei Zhang; Min Gu; Yazhou Ji; Lu Yang; Xiangjun Cheng; Xuelian Xiao; Jian Xu; Chunrong Gu; Jiexin Zhang; Shichang Zhang; Dan Chen; Shiyang Pan
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.452

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.