Literature DB >> 25730847

Joint control of terrestrial gross primary productivity by plant phenology and physiology.

Jianyang Xia1, Shuli Niu2, Philippe Ciais3, Ivan A Janssens4, Jiquan Chen5, Christof Ammann6, Altaf Arain7, Peter D Blanken8, Alessandro Cescatti9, Damien Bonal10, Nina Buchmann11, Peter S Curtis12, Shiping Chen13, Jinwei Dong14, Lawrence B Flanagan15, Christian Frankenberg16, Teodoro Georgiadis17, Christopher M Gough18, Dafeng Hui19, Gerard Kiely20, Jianwei Li21, Magnus Lund22, Vincenzo Magliulo23, Barbara Marcolla24, Lutz Merbold11, Leonardo Montagnani25, Eddy J Moors26, Jørgen E Olesen27, Shilong Piao28, Antonio Raschi29, Olivier Roupsard30, Andrew E Suyker31, Marek Urbaniak32, Francesco P Vaccari29, Andrej Varlagin33, Timo Vesala34, Matthew Wilkinson35, Ensheng Weng36, Georg Wohlfahrt37, Liming Yan38, Yiqi Luo39.   

Abstract

Terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP) varies greatly over time and space. A better understanding of this variability is necessary for more accurate predictions of the future climate-carbon cycle feedback. Recent studies have suggested that variability in GPP is driven by a broad range of biotic and abiotic factors operating mainly through changes in vegetation phenology and physiological processes. However, it is still unclear how plant phenology and physiology can be integrated to explain the spatiotemporal variability of terrestrial GPP. Based on analyses of eddy-covariance and satellite-derived data, we decomposed annual terrestrial GPP into the length of the CO2 uptake period (CUP) and the seasonal maximal capacity of CO2 uptake (GPPmax). The product of CUP and GPPmax explained >90% of the temporal GPP variability in most areas of North America during 2000-2010 and the spatial GPP variation among globally distributed eddy flux tower sites. It also explained GPP response to the European heatwave in 2003 (r(2) = 0.90) and GPP recovery after a fire disturbance in South Dakota (r(2) = 0.88). Additional analysis of the eddy-covariance flux data shows that the interbiome variation in annual GPP is better explained by that in GPPmax than CUP. These findings indicate that terrestrial GPP is jointly controlled by ecosystem-level plant phenology and photosynthetic capacity, and greater understanding of GPPmax and CUP responses to environmental and biological variations will, thus, improve predictions of GPP over time and space.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate extreme; ecosystem carbon uptake; growing season length; photosynthetic capacity; spatiotemporal variability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25730847      PMCID: PMC4352779          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1413090112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  18 in total

1.  Warming experiments underpredict plant phenological responses to climate change.

Authors:  E M Wolkovich; B I Cook; J M Allen; T M Crimmins; J L Betancourt; S E Travers; S Pau; J Regetz; T J Davies; N J B Kraft; T R Ault; K Bolmgren; S J Mazer; G J McCabe; B J McGill; C Parmesan; N Salamin; M D Schwartz; E E Cleland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Climate change. Ecosystem disturbance, carbon, and climate.

Authors:  Steven W Running
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Convergence of terrestrial plant production across global climate gradients.

Authors:  Sean T Michaletz; Dongliang Cheng; Andrew J Kerkhoff; Brian J Enquist
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Estimation of vegetation photosynthetic capacity from space-based measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence for terrestrial biosphere models.

Authors:  Yongguang Zhang; Luis Guanter; Joseph A Berry; Joanna Joiner; Christiaan van der Tol; Alfredo Huete; Anatoly Gitelson; Maximilian Voigt; Philipp Köhler
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 10.863

5.  Global and time-resolved monitoring of crop photosynthesis with chlorophyll fluorescence.

Authors:  Luis Guanter; Yongguang Zhang; Martin Jung; Joanna Joiner; Maximilian Voigt; Joseph A Berry; Christian Frankenberg; Alfredo R Huete; Pablo Zarco-Tejada; Jung-Eun Lee; M Susan Moran; Guillermo Ponce-Campos; Christian Beer; Gustavo Camps-Valls; Nina Buchmann; Damiano Gianelle; Katja Klumpp; Alessandro Cescatti; John M Baker; Timothy J Griffis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Tracking forest phenology and seasonal physiology using digital repeat photography: a critical assessment.

Authors:  B Darby; E Felts; O Sonnentag; M A Friedl; K Hufkens; J O'Keef; S Klosterman; J W Munger; M Toome; A D Richardson
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate.

Authors:  Christian Beer; Markus Reichstein; Enrico Tomelleri; Philippe Ciais; Martin Jung; Nuno Carvalhais; Christian Rödenbeck; M Altaf Arain; Dennis Baldocchi; Gordon B Bonan; Alberte Bondeau; Alessandro Cescatti; Gitta Lasslop; Anders Lindroth; Mark Lomas; Sebastiaan Luyssaert; Hank Margolis; Keith W Oleson; Olivier Roupsard; Elmar Veenendaal; Nicolas Viovy; Christopher Williams; F Ian Woodward; Dario Papale
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Evaluation of terrestrial carbon cycle models for their response to climate variability and to CO2 trends.

Authors:  Shilong Piao; Stephen Sitch; Philippe Ciais; Pierre Friedlingstein; Philippe Peylin; Xuhui Wang; Anders Ahlström; Alessandro Anav; Josep G Canadell; Nan Cong; Chris Huntingford; Martin Jung; Sam Levis; Peter E Levy; Junsheng Li; Xin Lin; Mark R Lomas; Meng Lu; Yiqi Luo; Yuecun Ma; Ranga B Myneni; Ben Poulter; Zhenzhong Sun; Tao Wang; Nicolas Viovy; Soenke Zaehle; Ning Zeng
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 10.863

9.  A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C 3 species.

Authors:  G D Farquhar; S von Caemmerer; J A Berry
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 4.116

10.  The plant phenological online database (PPODB): an online database for long-term phenological data.

Authors:  Jonas Dierenbach; Franz-W Badeck; Jörg Schaber
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.787

View more
  19 in total

1.  Resolving the Dust Bowl paradox of grassland responses to extreme drought.

Authors:  Alan K Knapp; Anping Chen; Robert J Griffin-Nolan; Lauren E Baur; Charles J W Carroll; Jesse E Gray; Ava M Hoffman; Xiran Li; Alison K Post; Ingrid J Slette; Scott L Collins; Yiqi Luo; Melinda D Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Xylogenesis reveals the genesis and ecological signal of IADFs in Pinus pinea L. and Arbutus unedo L.

Authors:  A Balzano; K Cufar; G Battipaglia; M Merela; P Prislan; G Aronne; V De Micco
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Effects of short-term grazing exclusion on plant phenology and reproductive succession in a Tibetan alpine meadow.

Authors:  Juntao Zhu; Yangjian Zhang; Yaojie Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Transitions in high-Arctic vegetation growth patterns and ecosystem productivity tracked with automated cameras from 2000 to 2013.

Authors:  Andreas Westergaard-Nielsen; Magnus Lund; Stine Højlund Pedersen; Niels Martin Schmidt; Stephen Klosterman; Jakob Abermann; Birger Ulf Hansen
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.129

5.  Temporal consistency between gross primary production and solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in the ten most populous megacity areas over years.

Authors:  Yaoping Cui; Xiangming Xiao; Yao Zhang; Jinwei Dong; Yuanwei Qin; Russell B Doughty; Geli Zhang; Jie Wang; Xiaocui Wu; Yaochen Qin; Shenghui Zhou; Joanna Joiner; Berrien Moore
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Evaluation of climate-related carbon turnover processes in global vegetation models for boreal and temperate forests.

Authors:  Martin Thurner; Christian Beer; Philippe Ciais; Andrew D Friend; Akihiko Ito; Axel Kleidon; Mark R Lomas; Shaun Quegan; Tim T Rademacher; Sibyll Schaphoff; Markus Tum; Andy Wiltshire; Nuno Carvalhais
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 10.863

7.  Dominant role of plant physiology in trend and variability of gross primary productivity in North America.

Authors:  Sha Zhou; Yao Zhang; Philippe Ciais; Xiangming Xiao; Yiqi Luo; Kelly K Caylor; Yuefei Huang; Guangqian Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Global patterns and climatic drivers of above- and belowground net primary productivity in grasslands.

Authors:  Yuanfeng Sun; Yuanhe Yang; Xia Zhao; Zhiyao Tang; Shaopeng Wang; Jingyun Fang
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 6.038

9.  Fast-cycling unit of root turnover in perennial herbaceous plants in a cold temperate ecosystem.

Authors:  Kai Sun; M Luke McCormack; Le Li; Zeqing Ma; Dali Guo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Timing of False Ring Formation in Pinus halepensis and Arbutus unedo in Southern Italy: Outlook from an Analysis of Xylogenesis and Tree-Ring Chronologies.

Authors:  Veronica De Micco; Angela Balzano; Katarina Čufar; Giovanna Aronne; Jožica Gričar; Maks Merela; Giovanna Battipaglia
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.