| Literature DB >> 25730847 |
Jianyang Xia1, Shuli Niu2, Philippe Ciais3, Ivan A Janssens4, Jiquan Chen5, Christof Ammann6, Altaf Arain7, Peter D Blanken8, Alessandro Cescatti9, Damien Bonal10, Nina Buchmann11, Peter S Curtis12, Shiping Chen13, Jinwei Dong14, Lawrence B Flanagan15, Christian Frankenberg16, Teodoro Georgiadis17, Christopher M Gough18, Dafeng Hui19, Gerard Kiely20, Jianwei Li21, Magnus Lund22, Vincenzo Magliulo23, Barbara Marcolla24, Lutz Merbold11, Leonardo Montagnani25, Eddy J Moors26, Jørgen E Olesen27, Shilong Piao28, Antonio Raschi29, Olivier Roupsard30, Andrew E Suyker31, Marek Urbaniak32, Francesco P Vaccari29, Andrej Varlagin33, Timo Vesala34, Matthew Wilkinson35, Ensheng Weng36, Georg Wohlfahrt37, Liming Yan38, Yiqi Luo39.
Abstract
Terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP) varies greatly over time and space. A better understanding of this variability is necessary for more accurate predictions of the future climate-carbon cycle feedback. Recent studies have suggested that variability in GPP is driven by a broad range of biotic and abiotic factors operating mainly through changes in vegetation phenology and physiological processes. However, it is still unclear how plant phenology and physiology can be integrated to explain the spatiotemporal variability of terrestrial GPP. Based on analyses of eddy-covariance and satellite-derived data, we decomposed annual terrestrial GPP into the length of the CO2 uptake period (CUP) and the seasonal maximal capacity of CO2 uptake (GPPmax). The product of CUP and GPPmax explained >90% of the temporal GPP variability in most areas of North America during 2000-2010 and the spatial GPP variation among globally distributed eddy flux tower sites. It also explained GPP response to the European heatwave in 2003 (r(2) = 0.90) and GPP recovery after a fire disturbance in South Dakota (r(2) = 0.88). Additional analysis of the eddy-covariance flux data shows that the interbiome variation in annual GPP is better explained by that in GPPmax than CUP. These findings indicate that terrestrial GPP is jointly controlled by ecosystem-level plant phenology and photosynthetic capacity, and greater understanding of GPPmax and CUP responses to environmental and biological variations will, thus, improve predictions of GPP over time and space.Entities:
Keywords: climate extreme; ecosystem carbon uptake; growing season length; photosynthetic capacity; spatiotemporal variability
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25730847 PMCID: PMC4352779 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1413090112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 12.779