Literature DB >> 25730224

Underrepresentation of women in clinical trials: why gynecologic oncologists are worried.

Marcela G Del Carmen1, Laurel W Rice.   

Abstract

In gynecologic oncology, significant advances with improved patient outcomes have clearly and thankfully resulted from randomized clinical trials. The recent restructuring of cooperative groups and decreased funding for phase III clinical trials have unintentionally resulted in a 90% reduction of available trials and accrual in gynecologic oncology. This Commentary reviews the history of the underrepresentation of women in clinical trials, highlighting the challenges that threaten the viability of gynecologic oncology clinical research, resulting in a decreased likelihood of improving the survival of women with gynecologic cancer. We suggest an opportunity for partnering with the U.S. government and the private sector to enhance research funding opportunities while increasing advocacy efforts to reinvigorate our clinical trials platform.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25730224     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  2 in total

1.  Adult Cancer Survivors' Engagement and Interest in Patient-Centered Research.

Authors:  Margaret M Lubas; Yan Lu; Aaron W Gehr; Bassam Ghabach; Bhavna Tanna; Kalyani Narra; Tara M Brinkman; Rohit P Ojha
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Results of a Community Randomized Study of a Faith-Based Education Program to Improve Clinical Trial Participation among African Americans.

Authors:  Paula M Frew; Jay T Schamel; Kelli A O'Connell; Laura A Randall; Sahithi Boggavarapu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.