Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari1. 1. Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine; Blood and Marrow Transplant Program; Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, U.S.A.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Much recent interest in lung bioengineering by pulmonary investigators, industry and the organ transplant field has seen a rapid growth of bioreactor development ranging from the microfluidic scale to the human-sized whole lung systems. A comprehension of the findings from these models is needed to provide the basis for further bioreactor development. OBJECTIVE: The goal was to comprehensively review the current state of bioreactor development for the lung. METHODS: A search using PubMed was done for published, peer-reviewed papers using the keywords "lung" AND "bioreactor" or "bioengineering" or "tissue engineering" or "ex vivo perfusion". MAIN RESULTS: Many new bioreactors ranging from the microfluidic scale to the human-sized whole lung systems have been developed by both academic and commercial entities. Microfluidic, lung-mimic and lung slice cultures have the advantages of cost-efficiency and high throughput analyses ideal for pharmaceutical and toxicity studies. Perfused/ventilated rodent whole lung systems can be adapted for mid-throughput studies of lung stem/progenitor cell development, cell behavior, understanding and treating lung injury and for preliminary work that can be translated to human lung bioengineering. Human-sized ex vivo whole lung bioreactors incorporating perfusion and ventilation are amenable to automation and have been used for whole lung decellularization and recellularization. Clinical scale ex vivo lung perfusion systems have been developed for lung preservation and reconditioning and are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Significant advances in bioreactors for lung engineering have been made at both the microfluidic and the macro scale. The most advanced are closed systems that incorporate pressure-controlled perfusion and ventilation and are amenable to automation. Ex vivo lung perfusion systems have advanced to clinical trials for lung preservation and reconditioning. The biggest challenges that lie ahead for lung bioengineering can only be overcome by future advances in technology that solve the problems of cell production and tissue incorporation.
RATIONALE: Much recent interest in lung bioengineering by pulmonary investigators, industry and the organ transplant field has seen a rapid growth of bioreactor development ranging from the microfluidic scale to the human-sized whole lung systems. A comprehension of the findings from these models is needed to provide the basis for further bioreactor development. OBJECTIVE: The goal was to comprehensively review the current state of bioreactor development for the lung. METHODS: A search using PubMed was done for published, peer-reviewed papers using the keywords "lung" AND "bioreactor" or "bioengineering" or "tissue engineering" or "ex vivo perfusion". MAIN RESULTS: Many new bioreactors ranging from the microfluidic scale to the human-sized whole lung systems have been developed by both academic and commercial entities. Microfluidic, lung-mimic and lung slice cultures have the advantages of cost-efficiency and high throughput analyses ideal for pharmaceutical and toxicity studies. Perfused/ventilated rodent whole lung systems can be adapted for mid-throughput studies of lung stem/progenitor cell development, cell behavior, understanding and treating lung injury and for preliminary work that can be translated to human lung bioengineering. Human-sized ex vivo whole lung bioreactors incorporating perfusion and ventilation are amenable to automation and have been used for whole lung decellularization and recellularization. Clinical scale ex vivo lung perfusion systems have been developed for lung preservation and reconditioning and are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Significant advances in bioreactors for lung engineering have been made at both the microfluidic and the macro scale. The most advanced are closed systems that incorporate pressure-controlled perfusion and ventilation and are amenable to automation. Ex vivo lung perfusion systems have advanced to clinical trials for lung preservation and reconditioning. The biggest challenges that lie ahead for lung bioengineering can only be overcome by future advances in technology that solve the problems of cell production and tissue incorporation.
Authors: Marcelo Cypel; Jonathan C Yeung; Mingyao Liu; Masaki Anraku; Fengshi Chen; Wojtek Karolak; Masaaki Sato; Jane Laratta; Sassan Azad; Mindy Madonik; Chung-Wai Chow; Cecilia Chaparro; Michael Hutcheon; Lianne G Singer; Arthur S Slutsky; Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Marc de Perrot; Andrew F Pierre; Thomas K Waddell; Shaf Keshavjee Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joan E Nichols; Jean Niles; Michael Riddle; Gracie Vargas; Tuya Schilagard; Liang Ma; Kert Edward; Saverio La Francesca; Jason Sakamoto; Stephanie Vega; Marie Ogadegbe; Ronald Mlcak; Donald Deyo; Lee Woodson; Christopher McQuitty; Scott Lick; Daniel Beckles; Esther Melo; Joaquin Cortiella Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2013-06-11 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Andrew P Price; Lindsay M Godin; Alex Domek; Trevor Cotter; Jonathan D'Cunha; Doris A Taylor; Angela Panoskaltsis-Mortari Journal: Tissue Eng Part C Methods Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.056
Authors: Jonathan C Yeung; Marcelo Cypel; Thomas K Waddell; Dirk van Raemdonck; Shaf Keshavjee Journal: Thorac Surg Clin Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 1.750
Authors: Joaquin Cortiella; Jean Niles; Andrea Cantu; Andrea Brettler; Anthony Pham; Gracie Vargas; Sean Winston; Jennifer Wang; Shannon Walls; Joan E Nichols Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Ramaswamy Sreenivasan; Erik K Bassett; David M Hoganson; Joseph P Vacanti; Karen K Gleason Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Elizabeth A Calle; Mahboobe Ghaedi; Sumati Sundaram; Amogh Sivarapatna; Michelle K Tseng; Laura E Niklason Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: D F McAuley; G F Curley; U I Hamid; J G Laffey; J Abbott; D H McKenna; X Fang; M A Matthay; J W Lee Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Juan J Uriarte; Franziska E Uhl; Sara E Rolandsson Enes; Robert A Pouliot; Daniel J Weiss Journal: Curr Opin Organ Transplant Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 2.640