Literature DB >> 25729126

Individual responsiveness to shock and colony-level aggression in honey bees: evidence for a genetic component.

Arian Avalos1, Yoselyn Rodríguez-Cruz1, Tugrul Giray1.   

Abstract

The phenotype of the social group is related to phenotypes of individuals that form that society. We examined how honey bee colony aggressiveness relates to individual response of male drones and foraging workers. Although the natural focus in colony aggression has been on the worker caste, the sterile females engaged in colony maintenance and defense, males carry the same genes. We measured aggressiveness scores of colonies and examined components of individual aggressive behavior in workers and haploid sons of workers from the same colony. We describe for the first time, that males, although they have no stinger, do bend their abdomen (abdominal flexion) in a posture similar to stinging behavior of workers in response to electric shock. Individual worker sting response and movement rates in response to shock were significantly correlated with colony scores. In the case of drones, sons of workers from the same colonies, abdominal flexion significantly correlated but their movement rates did not correlate with colony aggressiveness. Furthermore, the number of workers responding at increasing levels of voltage exhibits a threshold-like response, whereas the drones respond in increasing proportion to shock. We conclude that there are common and caste-specific components to aggressive behavior in honey bees. We discuss implications of these results on social and behavioral regulation and genetics of aggressive response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdomen Flexion; Aggression; Drone; Honey bee; Shock; Sting

Year:  2014        PMID: 25729126      PMCID: PMC4339078          DOI: 10.1007/s00265-014-1689-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol        ISSN: 0340-5443            Impact factor:   2.980


  34 in total

1.  Evolution of eusociality and the soldier caste in termites: a validation of the intrinsic benefit hypothesis.

Authors:  E A Roux; J Korb
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  A morphologically specialized soldier caste improves colony defense in a neotropical eusocial bee.

Authors:  Christoph Grüter; Cristiano Menezes; Vera L Imperatriz-Fonseca; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Confirmation of QTL effects and evidence of genetic dominance of honeybee defensive behavior: results of colony and individual behavioral assays.

Authors:  Ernesto Guzmán-Novoa; Greg J Hunt; José L Uribe; Christine Smith; Miguel E Arechavaleta-Velasco
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 4.  The evolution of soldiers in aphids.

Authors:  D L Stern; W A Foster
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1996-02

Review 5.  Rules and mechanisms of punishment learning in honey bees: the aversive conditioning of the sting extension response.

Authors:  Stevanus Rio Tedjakumala; Martin Giurfa
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Expansion of the neuropil of the mushroom bodies in male honey bees is coincident with initiation of flight.

Authors:  S E Fahrbach; T Giray; S M Farris; G E Robinson
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1997-11-07       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  An alarm pheromone modulates appetitive olfactory learning in the honeybee (apis mellifera).

Authors:  Elodie Urlacher; Bernard Francés; Martin Giurfa; Jean-Marc Devaud
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Dopamine and octopamine influence avoidance learning of honey bees in a place preference assay.

Authors:  Maitreyi Agarwal; Manuel Giannoni Guzmán; Carla Morales-Matos; Rafael Alejandro Del Valle Díaz; Charles I Abramson; Tugrul Giray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Motor pattern of the stinging response in the honeybee Apis mellifera

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 10.  Behavioral genomics of honeybee foraging and nest defense.

Authors:  Greg J Hunt; Gro V Amdam; David Schlipalius; Christine Emore; Nagesh Sardesai; Christie E Williams; Olav Rueppell; Ernesto Guzmán-Novoa; Miguel Arechavaleta-Velasco; Sathees Chandra; M Kim Fondrk; Martin Beye; Robert E Page
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2006-12-15
View more
  3 in total

1.  Genomic regions influencing aggressive behavior in honey bees are defined by colony allele frequencies.

Authors:  Arián Avalos; Miaoquan Fang; Hailin Pan; Aixa Ramirez Lluch; Alexander E Lipka; Sihai Dave Zhao; Tugrul Giray; Gene E Robinson; Guojie Zhang; Matthew E Hudson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ethanol-induced effects on sting extension response and punishment learning in the western honey bee (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Manuel A Giannoni-Guzmán; Tugrul Giray; Jose Luis Agosto-Rivera; Blake K Stevison; Brett Freeman; Paige Ricci; Erika A Brown; Charles I Abramson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Social signals and aversive learning in honey bee drones and workers.

Authors:  Arian Avalos; Eddie Pérez; Lianna Vallejo; María E Pérez; Charles I Abramson; Tugrul Giray
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 2.422

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.