Literature DB >> 2572899

Comparison of daily and twice-weekly regimens to treat pulmonary tuberculosis.

A Castelo1, J R Jardim, S Goihman, A S Kalckman, M A Dalboni, E A da Silva, R B Haynes.   

Abstract

A randomised controlled trial compared the effectiveness and toxicity in pulmonary tuberculosis of two drug regimens containing rifampicin and isoniazid given daily or twice-weekly for 4 months after a 2-month period of intensive treatment with daily isoniazid, rifampicin, and pyrazinamide. 667 patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis were randomly allocated to continue daily treatment with isoniazid (400 mg) and rifampicin (600 mg) or to twice-weekly treatment with isoniazid (900 mg) and rifampicin (600 mg). 544 of the 667 patients (81%) completed the 6-month course (287 of 337 [85%] treated daily and 257 of 330 [79%] treated twice-weekly). Drug toxicity was not a great problem; the treatment was permanently discontinued in only 2% of patients. There was no significant difference at the end of months 5 and/or 6 of chemotherapy between the groups treated daily and twice-weekly in the proportions with bacteriological failure (at least one positive sputum culture with more than 20 colonies) or who had died from tuberculosis (17 [6%] vs 10 [3%]). Nor was there a significant difference in the relapse rate (17 [7%] treated daily vs 10 [4%] treated twice-weekly) during follow-up of 12 months. Thus, the twice-weekly regimen was at least as effective as the daily regimen for treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2572899     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91788-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  7 in total

Review 1.  Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the rifamycin antibacterials.

Authors:  W J Burman; K Gallicano; C Peloquin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Cost effectiveness of antituberculosis interventions.

Authors:  A Castelo; P A Mathiasi; R Iunes; A L Kritski; M Dalcolmo; F Fiuza de Melo; M Drummond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Cabergoline. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic potential in the treatment of hyperprolactinaemia and inhibition of lactation.

Authors:  C P Rains; H M Bryson; A Fitton
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Current and potential treatment of tuberculosis.

Authors:  S Houston; A Fanning
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Tuberculosis in the AIDS era.

Authors:  K A Sepkowitz; J Raffalli; L Riley; T E Kiehn; D Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  Standardized treatment of active tuberculosis in patients with previous treatment and/or with mono-resistance to isoniazid: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dick Menzies; Andrea Benedetti; Anita Paydar; Sarah Royce; Pai Madhukar; William Burman; Andrew Vernon; Christian Lienhardt
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Wirelessly observed therapy compared to directly observed therapy to confirm and support tuberculosis treatment adherence: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sara H Browne; Anya Umlauf; Amanda J Tucker; Julie Low; Kathleen Moser; Jonathan Gonzalez Garcia; Charles A Peloquin; Terrence Blaschke; Florin Vaida; Constance A Benson
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 11.069

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.