Literature DB >> 25728963

Surgical anatomy of the aortic annulus: landmarks for external annuloplasty in aortic valve repair.

Nizar Khelil1, Ghassan Sleilaty1, Michele Palladino1, Mahmoud Fouda1, Remi Escande1, Mathieu Debauchez1, Isabelle Di Centa2, Emmanuel Lansac3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although reduction of a dilated aortic annulus is becoming an essential parameter for durable valve repair, anatomical descriptions of the annulus and surgical landmarks of the subvalvular plane for an external aortic annuloplasty remain to be defined.
METHODS: Twenty hearts with normal anatomy with tricuspid aortic valves were studied. Annulus diameter, cusp geometric height, and interleaflet triangles heights were measured. The aortic root was dissected externally down to the subvalvular plane as to perform an external aortic annuloplasty or reimplantation procedure proximal anastomosis. Tissue thickness and dissection heights relative to the annulus were measured at each cusp nadir and at the middle of each interleaflet triangle.
RESULTS: The mean annulus diameter, cusp geometric height, and interleaflet triangle heights were, respectively, 24.9 ± 0.2 mm, 19.7 ± 0.3 mm, and 20.1 ± 0.5 mm. External dissection of the aortic root reached the subvalvular plane below the nadir of left coronary cusp (-2.7 ± 0.4 mm), noncoronary (NC) cusp (-3.1 ± 0.3 mm), and the base of left-NC interleaflet triangle (-2.1 ± 0.4 mm). External dissection remained above the nadir of the right coronary cusp (+1.4 ± 0.4 mm), base of left-right interleaflet triangle (+2.4 ± 0.6 mm), and right-NC interleaflet triangle (+3.4 ± 0.3 mm). Mean tissue thickness between the inner and external side of the subvalvular plane was 2.5 ± 0.1 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: External dissection of the aortic annulus allows subvalvular placement of an external aortic ring below the left and NC cusps and below or within 3 mm of the right cusp nadir in 80% of cases. An external aortic annuloplasty would induce at least a 5-mm reduction of annulus diameter, corresponding to tissue thickness. Precise anatomical landmarks are important to standardize aortic valve annuloplasty.
Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25728963     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.12.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  9 in total

Review 1.  Annular management during aortic valve repair: a systematic review.

Authors:  Takashi Kunihara
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-11-25

Review 2.  Anatomy of the aortic root: implications for aortic root reconstruction.

Authors:  Takashi Kunihara
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-06-27

3.  Aortic annulus and the importance of annuloplasty.

Authors:  Pouya Youssefi; Emmanuel Lansac
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-10-07

Review 4.  Geometry of cusp and root determines aortic valve function.

Authors:  Shunsuke Matsushima; Irem Karliova; Simon Gauer; Shunsuke Miyahara; Hans-Joachim Schäfers
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-04-06

Review 5.  Aortic valve sparing root surgery for Marfan syndrome.

Authors:  George Matalanis; Nisal K Perera
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-11

6.  Comparison of Dacron ring and suture annuloplasty for aortic valve repair-a porcine study.

Authors:  Leila Louise Benhassen; Diana Mathilde Ropcke; Mona Sharghbin; Troels Lading; Jens Kæstel Skov; Marcell Juan Tjørnild; Karen Bagger Poulsen; Tommy Bechsgaard; Søren Nielsen Skov; Sten Lyager Nielsen; John Michael Hasenkam
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-05

7.  Focus on the annuloplasty in aortic valve repair: implications from a quantitative multislice computed tomography analysis.

Authors:  Niklas Neumann; Johannes Petersen; Christoph Sinning; Tatiana Sequeira-Gross; Niklas Schofer; Hermann Reichenspurner; Evaldas Girdauskas
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-04

8.  International Consensus Statement on Nomenclature and Classification of the Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Its Aortopathy, for Clinical, Surgical, Interventional and Research Purposes.

Authors:  Hector I Michelena; Alessandro Della Corte; Arturo Evangelista; Joseph J Maleszewski; William D Edwards; Mary J Roman; Richard B Devereux; Borja Fernández; Federico M Asch; Alex J Barker; Lilia M Sierra-Galan; Laurent De Kerchove; Susan M Fernandes; Paul W M Fedak; Evaldas Girdauskas; Victoria Delgado; Suhny Abbara; Emmanuel Lansac; Siddharth K Prakash; Malenka M Bissell; Bogdan A Popescu; Michael D Hope; Marta Sitges; Vinod H Thourani; Phillippe Pibarot; Krishnaswamy Chandrasekaran; Patrizio Lancellotti; Michael A Borger; John K Forrest; John Webb; Dianna M Milewicz; Raj Makkaar; Martin B Leon; Stephen P Sanders; Michael Markl; Victor A Ferrari; William C Roberts; Jae-Kwan Song; Philipp Blanke; Charles S White; Samuel Siu; Lars G Svensson; Alan C Braverman; Joseph Bavaria; Thoralf M Sundt; Gebrine El Khoury; Ruggero De Paulis; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Jeroen J Bax; Catherine M Otto; Hans-Joachim Schäfers
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2021-07-22

Review 9.  Speaking a common language: the international consensus on bicuspid aortic valve nomenclature and classification.

Authors:  Hector I Michelena
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.