Literature DB >> 25728891

Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery for colon cancer: the effect of surgical trauma on the bacterial translocation. A prospective randomized study.

Mario Schietroma1, Beatrice Pessia2, Francesco Carlei1, Emanuela Marina Cecilia1, Giuseppe De Santis1, Gianfranco Amicucci1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies suggest that surgical manipulation of the intestine and increased intra-abdominal pressure promotes bacterial translocation (BT). This prospective randomized study has investigated the effect of surgery on BT in patients undergoing elective colectomy for colon cancer by comparing the laparoscopic with the open approach.
METHODS: One hundred nineteen consecutive patients underwent colectomy for colon cancer: 59 cases underwent open resection and 60 cases underwent laparoscopic resection. For bacterial identification, tissue samples were taken from the liver, spleen, and mesenteric lymph nodes.
RESULTS: The incidence of BT increased in laparoscopic and open group after bowel mobilization (prior to ligation of the vascular pedicle), compared with the before mobilization (P < .05). There was not a statistically significant difference in BT value between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSION: BT increase was observed during the open and laparoscopic resection for colon cancer, without significant statistical difference between the 2 groups.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacterial translocation; Colon cancer; Intestinal permeability; Laparoscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25728891     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.09.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  6 in total

Review 1.  Mid- and low-rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open treatment-short- and long-term results. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Mario Schietroma; Lucia Romano; Adriana Ionelia Apostol; Silvia Vada; Stefano Necozione; Francesco Carlei; Antonio Giuliani
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Comparison of robot-assisted surgery, laparoscopic-assisted surgery, and open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shihou Sheng; Tiancheng Zhao; Xu Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  A Population of Radio-Resistant Macrophages in the Deep Myenteric Plexus Contributes to Postoperative Ileus Via Toll-Like Receptor 3 Signaling.

Authors:  Jana Enderes; Shilpashree Mallesh; Reiner Schneider; Kristof J Hupa; Mariola Lysson; Bianca Schneiker; Kristian Händler; Balthasar Schlotmann; Patrick Günther; Joachim L Schultze; Jörg C Kalff; Sven Wehner
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 4.  Bacterial Translocation in Gastrointestinal Cancers and Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Keita Kouzu; Hironori Tsujimoto; Yoji Kishi; Hideki Ueno; Nariyoshi Shinomiya
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-02-04

5.  Spillage of bacterial products during colon surgery increases the risk of liver metastases development in a rat colon carcinoma model.

Authors:  Simran Grewal; Rianne Korthouwer; Marijn Bögels; Rens Braster; Niels Heemskerk; Andries E Budding; Stephan M Pouw; Jack van Horssen; Marjolein Ankersmit; Jeroen Meijerink; Petrousjka van den Tol; Steven Oosterling; Jaap Bonjer; Nuray Gül; Marjolein van Egmond
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 6.  Squamous cell anal cancer: Management and therapeutic options.

Authors:  Beatrice Pessia; Lucia Romano; Antonio Giuliani; Gianni Lazzarin; Francesco Carlei; Mario Schietroma
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.