Literature DB >> 25728816

Parallels between two geographically and ecologically disparate cave invasions by the same species, Asellus aquaticus (Isopoda, Crustacea).

M Konec1, S Prevorčnik, S M Sarbu, R Verovnik, P Trontelj.   

Abstract

Caves are long-known examples of evolutionary replications where similar morphologies (troglomorphies) evolve independently as the result of strong natural selection of the extreme environment. Recently, this paradigm has been challenged based on observations that troglomorphies are inconsistent across taxa and different subterranean habitats. We investigated the degree of replicated phenotypic change in two independent cave invasions by the freshwater isopod Asellus aquaticus; the first in a sulphidic aquifer in Romania, the second in a sinking river in the Dinaric Karst in Slovenia. Both ancestral surface populations still live alongside the subterranean ones. Phylogenetic analyses show independence of the two colonization events, and microsatellite analysis shows no evidence of ongoing genetic exchange between surface and subterranean ecomorphs. The overall morphology has changed dramatically at both sites (50 of 62 morphometric traits). The amount of phenotypic change did not reflect differences in genetic diversity between the two ancestral populations. Multivariate analyses revealed divergent evolution in caves, not parallel or convergent as predicted by the current paradigm. Still, 18 traits changed in a parallel fashion, including eye and pigment loss and antennal elongation. These changes might be a consequence of darkness as the only common ecological feature, because Romanian caves are chemoautotrophic and rich in food, whereas Slovenian caves are not. Overall, these results show that morphologically alike surface populations can diverge after invading different subterranean habitats, and that only about one-third of all changing traits behave as troglomorphies in the traditional sense.
© 2015 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2015 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; divergence; microsatellites; morphometric traits; parallel evolution; population structure; subterranean; troglomorphy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25728816     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  6 in total

1.  Light triggers habitat choice of eyeless subterranean but not of eyed surface amphipods.

Authors:  Žiga Fišer; Luka Novak; Roman Luštrik; Cene Fišer
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-01-12

2.  Comparative study of acetylcholinesterase and glutathione S-transferase activities of closely related cave and surface Asellus aquaticus (Isopoda: Crustacea).

Authors:  Anita Jemec; David Škufca; Simona Prevorčnik; Žiga Fišer; Primož Zidar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Embryonic origin and genetic basis of cave associated phenotypes in the isopod crustacean Asellus aquaticus.

Authors:  Hafasa Mojaddidi; Franco E Fernandez; Priscilla A Erickson; Meredith E Protas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Chronic radiation exposure at Chernobyl shows no effect on genetic diversity in the freshwater crustacean, Asellus aquaticus thirty years on.

Authors:  Neil Fuller; Alex T Ford; Adélaïde Lerebours; Dmitri I Gudkov; Liubov L Nagorskaya; Jim T Smith
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  The role of isolation on contrasting phylogeographic patterns in two cave crustaceans.

Authors:  Jorge L Pérez-Moreno; Gergely Balázs; Blake Wilkins; Gábor Herczeg; Heather D Bracken-Grissom
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  Developmental Transcriptomic Analysis of the Cave-Dwelling Crustacean, Asellus aquaticus.

Authors:  Joshua B Gross; Dennis A Sun; Brian M Carlson; Sivan Brodo-Abo; Meredith E Protas
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 4.096

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.