Literature DB >> 25728534

Acetabular fractures in elderly patients: a comparative study of low-energy versus high-energy injuries.

Ji Wan Kim1, Benoit Herbert, Jiandong Hao, William Min, Bruce H Ziran, Cyril Mauffrey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to compare the characteristics, clinical course, and mortality rates of acetabular fractures in the elderly population with respect to two types of injury.
METHODS: We reviewed 183 consecutive patients with acetabular fractures aged 60 years old and older. One hundred eighty-three patients (129 men and 54 women) were included in the study with an average age of 70.2 years. There were 186 fractures, which included three cases of bilateral fractures. Patients were divided into two groups: low-energy injuries (group I), 56, and high-energy injuries (group II), 130. Patient characteristics and fracture pattern, as well as in-hospital mortality rates were compared between the low-energy and high-energy groups.
RESULTS: Patient demographics and comorbidities were significantly different between the groups. In group I, the average age was 74.9 years, versus 68.2 years in group II (p < 0.001). The percent of females in each group was 39.3 % and 24.6 %, respectively (p = 0.043), and the average body mass index (BMI) was 25.6 and 28.4, respectively (p = 0.001). The Charlson comorbidity index was higher in group I (1.98 vs 0.95 in group II, p < 0.001). However, the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) was similar between groups (2.56 vs 2.53, respectively, p = 0.808). The proportion of surgical treatment was 44.6 % in group I and 61.6 % in group II (p = 0.019). Group II had a longer hospital stay (10.4 days vs 14.5 days, p = 0.025), but in-hospital death was not significantly different (5.3 % vs 7.9 %, respectively, p = 0.567).
CONCLUSION: Patients with acetabular fractures resulting from low-energy injuries were older and had lower BMI with more comorbidities. This study may highlight characteristics of fragility fractures of the acetabulum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25728534     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2711-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  22 in total

1.  Multiple comparisons procedures for comparing several treatments with a control based on binary data.

Authors:  C Chuang-Stein; D M Tong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Risk factors for in-hospital post-hip fracture mortality.

Authors:  Steven A Frost; Nguyen D Nguyen; Deborah A Black; John A Eisman; Tuan V Nguyen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Fractures of the acetabulum in patients aged 60 years and older: an epidemiological and radiological study.

Authors:  T A Ferguson; R Patel; M Bhandari; J M Matta
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-02

4.  FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell; A Oden; H Johansson; E McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Validation of a combined comorbidity index.

Authors:  M Charlson; T P Szatrowski; J Peterson; J Gold
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Predictors of early mortality after hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Muhammad Asim Khan; Fahad Siddique Hossain; Iftikhar Ahmed; Nagarajan Muthukumar; Amr Mohsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Treatment of multiple osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures by percutaneous cement augmentation.

Authors:  Agnieszka Saracen; Zbigniew Kotwica
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  One-year mortality after acetabular fractures in elderly patients presenting to a level-1 trauma center.

Authors:  Jesse E Bible; Adam Wegner; D Jake McClure; Rishin J Kadakia; Justin E Richards; Jennifer M Bauer; Hassan R Mir
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 9.  Osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  Julie T Lin; Joseph M Lane
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Fracture mechanisms and fracture pattern in men and women aged 50 years and older: a study of a 12-year population-based injury register, Umeå, Sweden.

Authors:  U Bergström; U Björnstig; H Stenlund; H Jonsson; O Svensson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 5.071

View more
  12 in total

1.  Epidemiology of acetabular fractures in Qatar.

Authors:  Malik Ahmed; Yousef Abuodeh; AbdulJabbar Alhammoud; Motasem Salameh; Khalid Hasan; Ghalib Ahmed
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Part 2: outcome of acetabular fractures and associated prognostic factors-a ten-year retrospective study of one hundred and fifty six operated cases with open reduction and internal fixation.

Authors:  Mehdi Boudissa; Sébastien Ruatti; Gael Kerschbaumer; Michel Milaire; Philippe Merloz; Jérôme Tonetti
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The use of buttress plates in the management of acetabular fractures with quadrilateral plate involvement: is it still a valid option?

Authors:  Theodoros H Tosounidis; Suribabu Gudipati; Michalis Panteli; Nikolaos K Kanakaris; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Fragility Fractures of the Acetabulum: Current Concepts for Improving Patients' Outcomes.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toro; Adriano Braile; Annalisa De Cicco; Raffaele Pezzella; Francesco Ascione; Antonio Benedetto Cecere; Alfredo Schiavone Panni
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 1.033

5.  Short-term results of percutaneous treatment of acetabular fractures: functional outcomes, radiographic assessment and complications.

Authors:  Anthony E Bozzio; Christopher R Johnson; Cyril Mauffrey
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Simultaneous open reduction and internal fixation and total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Wael Salama; Shazly Mousa; Abdelrahman Khalefa; Ahmed Sleem; Mohamed Kenawey; Laura Ravera; Alessandro Masse
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of acetabular anterior column fractures using the two-incision minimally invasive approach and a preshaped three dimension plate.

Authors:  Yan Zhuang; Shenglu Cao; Yanbin Lin; Renbin Li; Gang Wang; Yiran Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total hip replacement for osteoporotic acetabular fractures: a retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Sebastian P Boelch; Martin C Jordan; Rainer H Meffert; Hendrik Jansen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Total hip arthroplasty, combined with a reinforcement ring and posterior column plating for acetabular fractures in elderly patients: good outcome in 34 patients.

Authors:  Tõnis Lont; Jyrki Nieminen; Aleksi Reito; Toni-Karri Pakarinen; Ilari Pajamäki; Antti Eskelinen; Minna K Laitinen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  A Bibliometric Analysis of Fragility Fractures: Top 50.

Authors:  Nicolas Vuillemin; Hans-Christoph Pape; Pol Maria Rommens; Kurt Lippuner; Klaus-Arno Siebenrock; Marius Johann Keel; Johannes Dominik Bastian
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.