Literature DB >> 25728502

Assessment effects in educational and psychosocial intervention trials: an important but often-overlooked problem.

Mi-Kyung Song1, Sandra E Ward2.   

Abstract

Baseline assessments and repeated measures are an essential part of educational and psychosocial intervention trials, but merely measuring an outcome of interest can modify that outcome, either by the measurement process alone or by interacting with the intervention to strengthen or weaken the intervention effects. Assessment effects can result in biased estimates of intervention effects and may not be controlled by the usual two-group randomized controlled trial design. In this paper, we review the concept of assessment effects and other related phenomena, briefly describe study designs that estimate assessment effects separately from intervention effects and discuss their strengths and limitations, review evidence regarding the strength of assessment effects in intervention trials targeting behavior change, and discuss implications for intervention research.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment effects; behavior change; bias; external validity; internal validity; interventions; measurement; randomized trials

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25728502      PMCID: PMC4439294          DOI: 10.1002/nur.21651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  32 in total

1.  Patient preferences and randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  C R Brewin; C Bradley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-29

2.  Pretest and treatment effects in an elementary school-based alcohol misuse prevention program.

Authors:  P C Campanelli; T E Dielman; J T Shope; A T Butchart; D S Renner
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1989

3.  The Life Activities Inventory as a countermeasure for driving while intoxicated.

Authors:  R L Neff; J W Landrum
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1983-09

4.  HIV risk sensitization following a detailed sexual behavior interview: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  L S Weinhardt; K B Carey; M P Carey
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2000-08

Review 5.  Impact of participant and physician intervention preferences on randomized trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael King; Irwin Nazareth; Fiona Lampe; Peter Bower; Martin Chandler; Maria Morou; Bonnie Sibbald; Rosalind Lai
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Practice effects during repeated administrations of memory tests with and without alternate forms.

Authors:  R H Benedict; D J Zgaljardic
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.475

7.  Physical activity measurements affected participants' behavior in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Esther M F van Sluijs; Mireille N M van Poppel; Jos W R Twisk; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 8.  Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations.

Authors:  E F S Kaner; F Beyer; H O Dickinson; E Pienaar; F Campbell; C Schlesinger; N Heather; J Saunders; B Burnand
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

Review 9.  Can research assessments themselves cause bias in behaviour change trials? A systematic review of evidence from solomon 4-group studies.

Authors:  Jim McCambridge; Kaanan Butor-Bhavsar; John Witton; Diana Elbourne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Study design to examine the potential role of assessment reactivity in the Screening, Motivational Assessment, Referral, and Treatment in Emergency Departments (SMART-ED) protocol.

Authors:  Dennis M Donovan; Michael P Bogenschutz; Harold Perl; Alyssa Forcehimes; Bryon Adinoff; Raul Mandler; Neal Oden; Robrina Walker
Journal:  Addict Sci Clin Pract       Date:  2012-08-28
View more
  6 in total

1.  Advance care planning and end-of-life decision making in dialysis: a randomized controlled trial targeting patients and their surrogates.

Authors:  Mi-Kyung Song; Sandra E Ward; Jason P Fine; Laura C Hanson; Feng-Chang Lin; Gerald A Hladik; Jill B Hamilton; Jessica C Bridgman
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Associations Between Objective Sleep and Ambulatory Blood Pressure in a Community Sample.

Authors:  Caroline Y Doyle; John M Ruiz; Daniel J Taylor; Joshua W Smyth; Melissa Flores; Jessica R Dietch; Chul Ahn; Matthew Allison; Timothy W Smith; Bert N Uchino
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  Assessment reactivity: A randomized controlled trial of alcohol-specific measures on alcohol-related behaviors.

Authors:  Ellen Meier; Mary Beth Miller; Nate Lombardi; Thad Leffingwell
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  A randomized controlled pilot trial to improve advance care planning for LVAD patients and their surrogates.

Authors:  Maureen Metzger; Mi-Kyung Song; Sandra Ward; Patricia Pat-Yue Chang; Laura C Hanson; Feng-Chang Lin
Journal:  Heart Lung       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.210

5.  Racial Differences in Outcomes of an Advance Care Planning Intervention for Dialysis Patients and Their Surrogates.

Authors:  Mi-Kyung Song; Sandra E Ward; Feng-Chang Lin; Jill B Hamilton; Laura C Hanson; Gerald A Hladik; Jason P Fine
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.947

6.  Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment-based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre- and postintervention measures.

Authors:  Laura Kolijn; Bianca G van den Bulk; Saskia Euser; Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg; Marinus H van IJzendoorn; Rens Huffmeijer
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 2.708

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.