Literature DB >> 25728478

Making personalized medicine more affordable.

Naomi Aronson1.   

Abstract

Precision medicine holds promise to solve the conundrums of clinical care. Foremost is the well-known but vexing problem of heterogeneity and the tyranny of the mean. Who will respond to a treatment? How can patients avoid the harms of treatments that will not work for them? And if we know who to treat, will that make care more efficient and less costly? But the converse can also be true: treatments become more expensive as the costs of development must be distributed across smaller populations. Next-generation sequencing is making genetic testing radically cheaper. But the costs of medical tests also include false-positive results, incidental findings, and the cascade of follow-up. The affordability of precision medicine is intertwined with the broader issue of affordability of our healthcare system, and will require all stakeholders to assume stewardship for access and sustainability.
© 2015 New York Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomedical; costs; economics; genetic testing; individualized medicine; patient-centered; technology assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25728478     DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12614

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  8 in total

Review 1.  Precision medicine in cardiology.

Authors:  Elliott M Antman; Joseph Loscalzo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Making individualized drugs a reality.

Authors:  Huub Schellekens; Mohammed Aldosari; Herre Talsma; Enrico Mastrobattista
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Stakeholder attitudes towards establishing a national genomics registry of inherited cancer predisposition: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Melissa Monnik; Rachel Austin; Cassandra Nichols; Elisa Cops; Lucinda Salmon; Amanda B Spurdle; Finlay Macrae; Natalie Taylor; Nicholas Pachter; Paul James; Rajneesh Kaur
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2021-11-02

4.  Uptake of genetic counseling and multi-gene panel testing among women in the Intermountain West with previous negative BRCA1 and BRCA2 results contacted for updated testing.

Authors:  Ryan Mooney; Whitney Espinel; Ashley Elrick; Kelsey Kehoe; Wendy Kohlmann; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 2.717

5.  Benchmarking of Whole Exome Sequencing and Ad Hoc Designed Panels for Genetic Testing of Hereditary Cancer.

Authors:  Lídia Feliubadaló; Raúl Tonda; Mireia Gausachs; Jean-Rémi Trotta; Elisabeth Castellanos; Adriana López-Doriga; Àlex Teulé; Eva Tornero; Jesús Del Valle; Bernat Gel; Marta Gut; Marta Pineda; Sara González; Mireia Menéndez; Matilde Navarro; Gabriel Capellá; Ivo Gut; Eduard Serra; Joan Brunet; Sergi Beltran; Conxi Lázaro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Tissue-based next generation sequencing: application in a universal healthcare system.

Authors:  Seán O Hynes; Brendan Pang; Jacqueline A James; Perry Maxwell; Manuel Salto-Tellez
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Pilot study of an online training program to increase genetic literacy and communication skills in oncology healthcare professionals discussing BRCA1/2 genetic testing with breast and ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Paula Woodward; Margaret Gleeson; Maira Kentwell; Helen Mar Fan; Yoland Antill; Phyllis N Butow; Frances Boyle; Megan Best; Natalie Taylor; Katy Bell; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 2.446

Review 8.  Visual programming for next-generation sequencing data analytics.

Authors:  Franco Milicchio; Rebecca Rose; Jiang Bian; Jae Min; Mattia Prosperi
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.522

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.