Edda Fiebiger1, Samuel Nurko1, Willem S Lexmond1, Lan Hu2, Michael Pardo1, Nicole Heinz1, Katharine Rooney1, Jessica LaRosa1, Eleonora Dehlink1. 1. Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Center for Motility and Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders, and Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disease Center Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Center for Cancer Computational Biology, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quantification of tissue eosinophils remains the golden standard in diagnosing eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), but this approach suffers from poor specificity. It has been recognized that histopathological changes that occur in patients with EoE are associated with a disease-specific tissue transcriptome. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that digital mRNA profiling targeted at a set of EoE-specific and Th2 inflammatory genes in oesophageal biopsies could help differentiate patients with EoE from those with reflux oesophagitis (RE) or normal tissue histology (NH). METHODS: The mRNA expression levels of 79 target genes were defined in both proximal and distal biopsies of 196 patients with nCounter® (Nanostring) technology. According to clinicopathological diagnosis, these patients were grouped in a training set (35 EoE, 30 RE, 30 NH) for building of a three-class prediction model using the random forest method, and a blinded predictive set (n = 47) for model validation. RESULTS: A diagnostic model built on ten differentially expressed genes was able to differentiate with 100% sensitivity and specificity between conditions in the training set. In a blinded predictive set, this model was able to correctly predict EoE in 14 of 18 patients in distal (sensitivity 78%, 95% CI 52-93%) and 16 of 18 patients in proximal biopsies (sensitivity 89%, 95% CI 64-98%), without false-positive diagnosis of EoE in RE or NH patients (specificity 100%, 95% CI 85-100%). Sensitivity was increased to 94% (95% CI 71-100%) when either the best predictive distal or proximal biopsy was used. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We conclude that mRNA profiling of oesophageal tissue is an accurate diagnostic strategy in detecting EoE.
BACKGROUND: Quantification of tissue eosinophils remains the golden standard in diagnosing eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), but this approach suffers from poor specificity. It has been recognized that histopathological changes that occur in patients with EoE are associated with a disease-specific tissue transcriptome. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that digital mRNA profiling targeted at a set of EoE-specific and Th2 inflammatory genes in oesophageal biopsies could help differentiate patients with EoE from those with reflux oesophagitis (RE) or normal tissue histology (NH). METHODS: The mRNA expression levels of 79 target genes were defined in both proximal and distal biopsies of 196 patients with nCounter® (Nanostring) technology. According to clinicopathological diagnosis, these patients were grouped in a training set (35 EoE, 30 RE, 30 NH) for building of a three-class prediction model using the random forest method, and a blinded predictive set (n = 47) for model validation. RESULTS: A diagnostic model built on ten differentially expressed genes was able to differentiate with 100% sensitivity and specificity between conditions in the training set. In a blinded predictive set, this model was able to correctly predict EoE in 14 of 18 patients in distal (sensitivity 78%, 95% CI 52-93%) and 16 of 18 patients in proximal biopsies (sensitivity 89%, 95% CI 64-98%), without false-positive diagnosis of EoE in RE or NH patients (specificity 100%, 95% CI 85-100%). Sensitivity was increased to 94% (95% CI 71-100%) when either the best predictive distal or proximal biopsy was used. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We conclude that mRNA profiling of oesophageal tissue is an accurate diagnostic strategy in detecting EoE.
Authors: Jennifer A Nielsen; Donna J Lager; Matthew Lewin; Gabriel Rendon; Cory A Roberts Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: W S Lexmond; M Pardo; K Rooney; J A Goettel; S B Snapper; E H Yen; E Dehlink; S Nurko; E Fiebiger Journal: Clin Exp Allergy Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 5.018
Authors: Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les M Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-01-07 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Willem S Lexmond; Joana F Neves; Samuel Nurko; Torsten Olszak; Mark A Exley; Richard S Blumberg; Edda Fiebiger Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-02-11 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Evan S Dellon; Olga Speck; Kimberly Woodward; Jessica H Gebhart; Ryan D Madanick; Sidney Levinson; Karen J Fritchie; John T Woosley; Nicholas J Shaheen Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: A Papadopoulou; S Koletzko; R Heuschkel; J A Dias; K J Allen; S H Murch; S Chong; F Gottrand; S Husby; P Lionetti; M L Mearin; F M Ruemmele; M G Schäppi; A Staiano; M Wilschanski; Y Vandenplas Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Ting Wen; Emily M Stucke; Tommie M Grotjan; Katherine A Kemme; J Pablo Abonia; Philip E Putnam; James P Franciosi; Jose M Garza; Ajay Kaul; Eileen C King; Margaret H Collins; Jonathan P Kushner; Marc E Rothenberg Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Benjamin F Sallis; Lena Erkert; Sherezade Moñino-Romero; Utkucan Acar; Rina Wu; Liza Konnikova; Willem S Lexmond; Matthew J Hamilton; W Augustine Dunn; Zsolt Szepfalusi; Jon A Vanderhoof; Scott B Snapper; Jerrold R Turner; Jeffrey D Goldsmith; Lisa A Spencer; Samuel Nurko; Edda Fiebiger Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: W S Lexmond; J A Goettel; B F Sallis; K McCann; E H H M Rings; E Jensen-Jarolim; S Nurko; S B Snapper; E Fiebiger Journal: Allergy Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 13.146
Authors: Evan S Dellon; Ranjitha Veerappan; Sara R Selitsky; Joel S Parker; Leana L Higgins; RoseMary Beitia; Robert M Genta; Richard H Lash Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol Date: 2017-02-09 Impact factor: 4.488
Authors: Anne C A Mudde; Willem S Lexmond; Richard S Blumberg; Samuel Nurko; Edda Fiebiger Journal: World Allergy Organ J Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 4.084
Authors: Benjamin F Sallis; Utkucan Acar; Kelsey Hawthorne; Stephen J Babcock; Cynthia Kanagaratham; Jeffrey D Goldsmith; Rachel Rosen; Jon A Vanderhoof; Samuel Nurko; Edda Fiebiger Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2018-11-05 Impact factor: 7.561