Literature DB >> 25728241

Transvaginal sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18-30-year-old nulligravid women without endometriosis: association with symptoms.

S Pinzauti1, L Lazzeri1, C Tosti1, G Centini1, C Orlandini1, S Luisi1, E Zupi1, C Exacoustos2, F Petraglia1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether there are sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis in 18-30-year-old nulligravid women without endometriosis and to examine their association with symptoms of dysmenorrhea and abnormal uterine bleeding.
METHODS: This was a prospective observational study including women referred from a gynecology outpatient center to our university hospital for ultrasound examination. Inclusion criteria were age between 18 and 30 years, regular menstrual cycle and nulligravid status. Exclusion criteria were a past or current history of endometriosis, fibroids, ovarian cysts or lesions, endometrial pathology, current use of hormonal treatments or medications that would affect the menstrual cycle, previous uterine surgery and history of infertility. Women underwent a detailed clinical assessment and a two- (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) examination. 2D-TVS features associated with diffuse adenomyosis were predefined as: (1) heterogeneous myometrium; (2) hypoechoic striation in the myometrium; (3) myometrial anechoic lacunae or cysts; (4) asymmetrical myometrial thickening of the uterine walls with the presence of straight vessels, extending into the hypertrophic myometrium, on power Doppler examination. On 3D-TVS, endomyometrial junctional zone (JZ) was measured as the distance from the basal endometrium to the internal layer of the outer myometrium on coronal section at any level of the uterus, and the smallest (JZmin) and largest (JZmax) JZ thicknesses and their difference (JZdiff) were recorded. 3D-TVS evaluation was considered suggestive for adenomyosis when JZmax ≥ 8 mm and/or JZdiff ≥ 4 mm. The presence of associated symptomatology represented our main outcome: the amount of menstrual loss was assessed by a pictorial blood loss analysis chart (PBAC) and painful symptoms were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS).
RESULTS: During the observation period, 205 women (median age, 24 (interquartile range, 23-27) years) were enrolled into the study and 156 met the inclusion criteria. According to the 2D-TVS criteria, diffuse adenomyosis was found in 53 (34.0%) women and asymmetrical myometrial thickening of the uterine walls was the most common sonographic feature observed. ANOVA showed a significant relationship between the number of 2D-TVS features of diffuse adenomyosis and VAS score for dysmenorrhea (P = 0.005) as well as PBAC score for menstrual loss (P = 0.03). 3D-TVS showed that women with 2D-TVS features of diffuse adenomyosis had a significantly higher value of JZmax (6.38 ± 2.30 mm, P < 0.001), JZmin (2.07 ± 0.43 mm, P = 0.002) and JZdiff (4.33 ± 1.99 mm, P < 0.001) than did women without these features. Women with sonographic features of diffuse adenomyosis were symptomatic in 83% of cases, reported dysmenorrhea in 79.2% and showed a higher incidence of heavy bleeding than did those without these features (18.9% vs 2.9%; P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic features suggestive of diffuse adenomyosis may develop earlier in reproductive life than previously thought, and may occur in association with dysmenorrhea and abnormal uterine bleeding in nulligravid women. Their observation in these women should therefore warrant further gynecological investigation.
Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D-TVS; 3D-TVS; adenomyosis; dysmenorrhea; heavy menstrual bleeding; junctional zone; nulligravid; transvaginal ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25728241     DOI: 10.1002/uog.14834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  17 in total

1.  Association of 2D and 3D transvaginal ultrasound findings with adenomyosis in symptomatic women of reproductive age: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Santos Marques; Marina Paula Andres; Leandro A Mattos; Manoel O Gonçalves; Edmund Chada Baracat; Mauricio Simões Abrão
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 2.  Dysmenorrhea and related disorders.

Authors:  Mariagiulia Bernardi; Lucia Lazzeri; Federica Perelli; Fernando M Reis; Felice Petraglia
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-09-05

Review 3.  Recent advances in understanding and managing adenomyosis.

Authors:  Silvia Vannuccini; Felice Petraglia
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-03-13

4.  Transcriptome sequencing of adenomyosis eutopic endometrium: A new insight into its pathophysiology.

Authors:  Yuqian Xiang; Yabing Sun; Bingxin Yang; Yeping Yang; Ying Zhang; Tiantian Yu; Hefeng Huang; Junyu Zhang; Hong Xu
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.310

5.  The new application of mifepristone in the relief of adenomyosis-caused dysmenorrhea.

Authors:  Xuan Che; Jianzhang Wang; Jiayi He; Xinyue Guo; Tiantian Li; Xinmei Zhang
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Characterization of patients that can continue conservative treatment for adenomyosis.

Authors:  Chiho Miyagawa; Kosuke Murakami; Takako Tobiume; Takafumi Nonogaki; Noriomi Matsumura
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.809

7.  Transcriptomics of receptive endometrium in women with sonographic features of adenomyosis.

Authors:  Erika Prašnikar; Tanja Kunej; Mario Gorenjak; Uroš Potočnik; Borut Kovačič; Jure Knez
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 8.  Origin and Pathogenic Mechanisms of Uterine Adenomyosis: What Is Known So Far.

Authors:  Christina Anna Stratopoulou; Jacques Donnez; Marie-Madeleine Dolmans
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.060

9.  Sonographic Signs of Adenomyosis in Women with Endometriosis Are Associated with Infertility.

Authors:  Dean Decter; Nissim Arbib; Hila Markovitz; Daniel S Seidman; Vered H Eisenberg
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  From Clinical Symptoms to MR Imaging: Diagnostic Steps in Adenomyosis.

Authors:  H Krentel; C Cezar; S Becker; A Di Spiezio Sardo; V Tanos; M Wallwiener; R L De Wilde
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.