Literature DB >> 25727789

Toxicity induced by Basic Violet 14, Direct Red 28 and Acid Red 26 in zebrafish larvae.

Bing Shen1,2, Hong-Cui Liu3, Wen-Bin Ou4,5, Grant Eilers6, Sheng-Mei Zhou7, Fan-Guo Meng4, Chun-Qi Li3, Yong-Quan Li1.   

Abstract

Basic Violet 14, Direct Red 28 and Acid Red 26 are classified as carcinogenic dyes in the European textile ecology standard, despite insufficient toxicity data. In this study, the toxicity of these dyes was assessed in a zebrafish model, and the underlying toxic mechanisms were investigated. Basic Violet 14 and Direct Red 28 showed acute toxicity with a LC50 value at 60.63 and 476.84 µg ml(-1) , respectively, whereas the LC50 of Acid Red 26 was between 2500 and 2800 µg ml(-1) . Treatment with Basic Violet 14, Direct Red 28 and Acid Red 26 resulted in common developmental abnormalities including delayed yolk sac absorption and swimming bladder deflation. Hepatotoxicity was observed in zebrafish treated with Basic Violet 14, and cardiovascular toxicity was found in zebrafish treated with Acid Red 26 at concentrations higher than 2500 µg ml(-1) . Basic Violet 14 also caused significant up-regulation of GCLC gene expression in a dose-dependent manner whereas Acid Red 26 induced significant up-regulation of NKX2.5 and down-regulation of GATA4 at a high concentration in a dose-dependent manner. These results suggest that Basic Violet 14, Direct Red 28 and Acid Red 26 induce developmental and organ-specific toxicity, and oxidative stress may play a role in the hepatotoxicity of Basic Violet 14, the suppressed GATA4 expression may have a relation to the cardiovascular toxicity of Acid Red 26.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acid Red 26; Basic Violet 14; Direct Red 28; toxicity; zebrafish

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25727789     DOI: 10.1002/jat.3134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0260-437X            Impact factor:   3.446


  8 in total

1.  Bio-production of novel water-soluble yellow pigment from Aspergillus sp. and exploring its sustainable textile applications.

Authors:  S Pandiyarajan; P Premasudha; K Kadirvelu
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Alterations in the activity of certain enzymes in the gills of a carp Labeo rohita exposed to an azo dye, Eriochrome black T: a biochemical investigation.

Authors:  Ayan Srivastava; Usha Kumari; Ashwini Kumar Nigam; Swati Mittal; Ajay Kumar Mittal
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.794

3.  Developmental, Behavioral and Transcriptomic Changes in Zebrafish Embryos after Smoke Dye Exposure.

Authors:  Edward J Perkins; Kimberly T To; Lindsey St Mary; Charles H Laber; Anthony J Bednar; Lisa Truong; Robyn L Tanguay; Natàlia Garcia-Reyero
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-04-22

4.  Biodegradation of textile dye Reactive Blue 160 by Bacillus firmus (Bacillaceae: Bacillales) and non-target toxicity screening of their degraded products.

Authors:  Selvaraj Barathi; Chinnannan Karthik; Nadanasabapathi S; Indra Arulselvi Padikasan
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2019-12-04

5.  Morphological and Behavioral Effects in Zebrafish Embryos after Exposure to Smoke Dyes.

Authors:  Kimberly T To; Lindsey St Mary; Allyson H Wooley; Mitchell S Wilbanks; Anthony J Bednar; Edward J Perkins; Lisa Truong; Robyn L Tanguay; Natàlia Garcia-Reyero
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-01-10

6.  Bifidobacterium lactis BL-99 modulates intestinal inflammation and functions in zebrafish models.

Authors:  Meng Chen; Chinfeng Liu; Mingzhu Dai; Qinwen Wang; Chunqi Li; Weilian Hung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 7.  Occurrence of Natural and Synthetic Micro-Fibers in the Mediterranean Sea: A Review.

Authors:  Saul Santini; Eleonora De Beni; Tania Martellini; Chiara Sarti; Demetrio Randazzo; Roberto Ciraolo; Costanza Scopetani; Alessandra Cincinelli
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-07-13

8.  Biodecolourisation of Reactive Red 120 as a Sole Carbon Source by a Bacterial Consortium-Toxicity Assessment and Statistical Optimisation.

Authors:  Motharasan Manogaran; Nur Adeela Yasid; Ahmad Razi Othman; Baskaran Gunasekaran; Mohd Izuan Effendi Halmi; Mohd Yunus Abd Shukor
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.